Hi Gianluca,
I see in that the hash (7612977fbbd3f5ba9ac68cae2fe88a30577ed732) exists
in the branch there for it should get in the next build, Just to be on
the safe side, Moran, can u please re-verify it.
Regards,
Maor
7612977fbbd3f5ba9ac68cae2fe88a30577ed732 is in line for the next ovirt maintenance
release.
Moran.
On 04/24/2013 07:14 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Il giorno 19/mar/2013 17:10, "Maor Lipchuk" <mlipchuk(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:mlipchuk@redhat.com>> ha scritto:
>> FYI, the patch is at
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/13172/
>>
>> Thanks for your attention,
>> Maor
>>
>> On 03/19/2013 05:52 PM, Maor Lipchuk wrote:
>>> Hi Gianluca, I checked the code of 3.2 and you are right, the patch was
>>> not pushed there.
>>> Although it seems that the origin fix exists in 3.2, I will send a patch
>>> to fix that.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Maor
>>>
>>> On 03/19/2013 05:41 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> in my opinion 3.2.1 for fedora 18 doesn't contain this:
>>>>
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/11254/
>>>>
>>>> that was one of the biggest problems of 3.2
>>>>
>>>> see also this thread of mine:
>>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-February/012653.html
>>>>
>>>> I had to recompile 3.2 in the mean time and after update to 3.2.1 I
>>>> have again the same problems:
>>>> - clone from snapshot blocked white window
>>>> - snapshot details pane no information for network and disks
>>>>
>>>> So this update was totally worthless for me and I have to recompile
>>>> again 3.2.1....
>>>> bad!
>>>>
>>>> Gianluca
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
>>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
>>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
> Hello, I see that 3.2.2 is expected next week.
> Are we sure this patch went into?
> Any prebuilt rpms I can test against eventually?
> It would be a pain having for the third time (after 3.2.0 and 3.2.1)
> this feature not available in stock rpm repo and I didn't read anything
> blocking it.
> I also proposed to include its testing in testing cycle so that it could
> arise there before release. ..
> Cheers,
> Gianluca
>