Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] oVirt 3.6 Planning

Hello Livnat, On 15.09.2014 14:46, Livnat Peer wrote: > On 09/15/2014 03:15 PM, Daniel Helgenberger wrote: >> Hello, >> +1 for the iso uploader, >> +1 for hostusb in UI >> +1 EL 7 (on the roadmap anyway?) >> >> With hostusb some more host-dev virtualization could be added. Top of my >> list is: >> - SR-IOV >> - NPV >> - VFIO >> >> These things could be handled on cluster level - hypervisors need to >> have the same hardware configuration anyway. >> >> Also, I think its time to add official support for OpenVswitch? >> > Are you looking for a specific functionality that is available via > OpenVswitch (=OVS)? > also we have the Neutron integration where we use OVS. I think its sufficient to say OVS is a 'real' modern switch while plain ol' linux bridge is not (so much any more). Of curse, maybe implementing other things like macvtap and / or SR-IOV achieves just the same thing (at least for me, as I then mange vlans/trunks and QoS, Spanning Tree ect. on my switches). I know you can point on OpenStack integration because you get those features for 'free' (see Ceph). But what about users like me who do not wish / can / should implement the whole OpenStack but rather want to run 'plain' oVirt? I think this might not be a desirable way to add / modernize features as it creates a huge overhead (at least in my use case, medium business. I did this once for Glance 'just' to get a way to more easily handle import / export of image files, now I need to implement Neutron 'just' to get OVS?). Don't get me wrong - OpenStack integration is a wonderful thing witch leaves room for expansion - later on. Thanks!

> > >> Thanks, >> >> On 12.09.2014 14:23, Itamar Heim wrote: >>> With oVirt 3.5 nearing GA, time to ask for "what do you want to see in >>> oVirt 3.6"? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Itamar >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users(a)ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >