On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
<gianluca.cecchi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Yedidyah Bar David
<didi(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
>
> >
> > Two notes:
> > 1) it would be nice to pre-filter the drop down box when you have to
> > choose
> > the host where migrate the hosted engine...
> > So that if there are no hosts available you will be given a related
> > message
> > without choice at all and if there is a subset of eligible hosts inside
> > the
> > cluster, you will be proposed only to choose one of them and not all the
> > hosts inside the cluster.
>
> Makes sense, please open an RFE to track this. Thanks.
Been busy these latest days...
Opened now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399609
>
>
> >
> > 2) If the gui option becomes the default and preferred way to deploy
> > hosts
> > in self hosted engine environments I think it should be put in clearer
> > shape
> > that if you follow the default action you would not have high
> > availability
> > for the hosted engine vm.
> > Or changing the default action to "Deploy", or showing a popup if the
> > hosted
> > engine vm has only one host configured for it but there are other hosts
> > in
> > the cluster.
> > Just my opinion.
>
> Makes sense too, but I wonder if people will then be annoyed by forgetting
> to uncheck it even after having enough HA hosts, which does have its cost
> (both actual resource use and also reservations, IIUC). Perhaps we should
> enable by default and/or remind only until you have enough HA hosts, which
> can be a configurable number (and default e.g. to 3).
>
>
and here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399613