Re: [Users] save to restart libvirtd ?

Thanks Martin, I tested on a "almost" empty host I had to play with, and it seemed all went well, so will hopefully be able to regain ~11 GB of memory after restarting libvirtd :) .. I'll sign up to the other mailing list to find out why / how it could have grown this big :\

Thanks Alex On 04/15/2013 04:12 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart >> libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ? >> > Hi, > > for libvirt questions, I'd rather use libvirt-users(a)redhat.com, but for > this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that > enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are > being ran. > > Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every > single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of > your machines. > > Have a nice day, > Martin