Indeed, there is this problem wiht the virtio driver which creates this ,
sometimes huge bottleneck for machines tat do a fair amount of traffic.
Other than using DPDK OVS I would love to heard an alternative or a fix for
it. Currently being hit by this issue with no solution.
As you mention for a lab is fine but would be lovely to have a pretty
redundant scenario like this in production.
Fernando
2018-03-23 21:04 GMT-03:00 Charles Kozler <ckozleriii(a)gmail.com>:
Truth be told I dont really know. What I am going to be doing with it
is
pretty much mostly some lab stuff and get working with VRF's a bit
There is a known limitation with virtio backend driver uses interrupt mode
to receive packets and vSRX uses DPDK -
https://dpdk.readthedocs.io/
en/stable/nics/virtio.html which in turn creates a bottleneck in to the
guest VM. It is more ideal to use something like SR-IOV instead and remove
as many buffer layers as possible with PCI passthrough
One easier way too is to use DPDK OVS. I know ovirt supports OVS in later
versions more natively so I just didnt go after it and I dont know if there
is any difference between just regular OVS and DPDK OVS. I dont have a huge
requirement of insane throughput, just need to get packets from amazon back
to my lab and support overlapping subnets
This exercise was somewhat of a POC for me to see if it can be done. A lot
of Junipers documentation does not take in to account such things as ovirt
or proxmox or any linux overlay to hypervisors like it does for vmware /
vcenter which is no fault of their own. They assume flat KVM host (or 2 if
clustered) whereas stuff like ovirt can introduce variables (eg: no MAC
spoofing)
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:27 PM, FERNANDO FREDIANI <
fernando.frediani(a)upx.com> wrote:
> Out of curiosity how much traffic can it handle running in these Virtual
> Machines on the top of reasonable hardware ?
>
> Fernando
>
> 2018-03-23 4:58 GMT-03:00 Joop <jvdwege(a)xs4all.nl>:
>
>> On 22-3-2018 10:17, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:37 PM, Charles Kozler <
>> <ckozleriii@gmail.com>ckozleriii(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All -
>>>
>>> Recently did this and thought it would be worth documenting. I couldnt
>>> find any solid information on vsrx with kvm outside of flat KVM. This
>>> outlines some of the things I hit along the way and how to fix. This is my
>>> one small way of giving back to such an incredible open source tool
>>>
>>>
https://ckozler.net/vsrx-cluster-on-ovirtrhev/
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing!
>> Why didn't you just upload the qcow2 disk via the UI/API though?
>> There's quite a bit of manual work that I hope is not needed?
>>
>> @Work we're using Juniper too and oud of curiosity I downloaded the
>> qcow2 image and used the UI to upload it and add it to a VM. It just works
>> :-) oVirt++
>>
>> Joop
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>