On Apr 22, 2013, at 23:19 , Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 04/22/2013 01:59 PM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
>> >
>> >----- Original Message -----
>>> >>From: "Michal
Skrivanek"<michal.skrivanek(a)redhat.com>
>>> >>To:users@ovirt.org, "Thomas
Scofield"<tscofield(a)gmail.com>, "Vinzenz
Feenstra"<vfeenstr(a)redhat.com>, "Barak
>>> >>Azulay"<bazulay(a)redhat.com>, "Gal
Hammer"<ghammer(a)redhat.com>
>>> >>Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 11:48:18 AM
>>> >>Subject: Re: [Users] forced shutdown with client agent
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>On Apr 20, 2013, at 22:42 , Itamar Heim<iheim(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>> >>
>>>> >>>On 03/29/2013 04:58 AM, Thomas Scofield wrote:
>>>>> >>>>I have run into a scenario after installing the
client agent. If
>>>>> >>>>a VM
>>>>> >>>>is shutdown, the client agent calls the shutdown
command with a 1
>>>>> >>>>minute
>>>>> >>>>timeout.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>Dummy-2::INFO::2013-03-28
>>>>> >>>>14:05:21,892::vdsAgentLogic::138::root::Shutting down
(timeout =
>>>>> >>>>30,
>>>>> >>>>message = 'System Administrator has initiated
shutdown of this
>>>>> >>>>Virtual
>>>>> >>>>Machine. Virtual Machine is shutting down.'
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>Since the shutdown command is called with time
parameter the VM
>>>>> >>>>sets the
>>>>> >>>>/etc/nologin file. When the VM is forced down the
/etc/nologin
>>>>> >>>>file is
>>>>> >>>>not cleared and when it comes back up only root can
login until
>>>>> >>>>the
>>>>> >>>>/etc/nologin file is cleared.
If you don't
want it setting user_shutdown_timeout to 0 should solve this.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>hmmm, Vinzenz - should guest agent clear that on guest
startup, if
>>>> >>>guest agent set this at shutdown?
>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>>Is their some some reason the shutdown time is set to
30 seconds
>>>>> >>>>(rounded up to 1 minute in the code)?
it is
rounded up because unix shutdown works with minutes only. So it's the seconds from
user_shutdown_timeout is rounded up to minutes.
The Windows one should really be 30s.
>>>>> Are there any know issues
>>>>> >>>>with
>>>>> >>>>setting this to 0?
>>> >>I wouldn't mind changing this to 0 by default if there are no
>>> >>objections.
>>> >>Barak, Gal, what do you think? Do you see any strong reason for
>>> >>keeping a grace period?
>> >
>> >The idea was to allow a logged in user to orderly close his work right?
>> >For that I'm not sure that even 30 seconds is enough.
> For that typically sysadmins use 5 or 10 minutes. 30s is worthless, no one would be
able to react that fast…so to me this is the same as initiating shutdown right away.
It's graceful anyway and all common apps would save the workspace on SIGTERM anyway.
Well, does it even do anything on Windows?
> That's why I'd vote for 0. And keep is configurable in case you want to use
it, sure.
>
do we allow users to cancel the shutdown?
nope.
It can be stopped inside the guest, well, if you manage to do that in that short time.