On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
2017-09-12 15:03 GMT+02:00 Fabrice Bacchella <fabrice.bacchella(a)orange.fr>
:
> In the releases notes, even for the 4.6 rc, I see:
>
>
https://www.ovirt.org/release/4.1.6/
> ...
> OpsTools currently includes collectd 5.7.0, and the write_http plugin is
> packaged separately.
>
> But if I check the current state:
> yum list collectd-write_http collectd
> ...
> collectd.x86_64
> 5.7.2-1.el7
> @centos-opstools-release
> collectd-write_http.x86_64
> 5.7.2-1.el7
> @centos-opstools-release
>
> So I think the warning is not needed any more. One can uses both ovirt
> and epel without any special check.
>
Pushed
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81667 taking care of this too. In
general, I still consider EPEL harmful so just dropped the part related to
collectd.
Please note that there are still certain differences between OpsTools SIG
repo and EPEL in collectd* packaging, so you can be hit in the future
exactly the same way if you happen to mix and EPEL releases a new version.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
Red Hat EMEA <
https://www.redhat.com/>
<
https://red.ht/sig>
TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <
https://redhat.com/trusted>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Didi