4:34 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--kNwttSRPs68koQxvdSI5KDEeiPmQG9f68
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
I have ovirt 3.3 installed on on FC 19 hosts with vdsm 4.13.3-2.fc19.
One of the hosts (host1) is engine + node + SPM and the other host2 is
just a node. I have an iSCSI storage domain configured and accessible
from both nodes.
When creating a new disk in the SD, the underlying logical volume gets
properly created (seen in vgdisplay output on host1), but doesn't seem
to be automatically picked by host2. Consequently, when creating/booting
a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start on host2,
because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is started on
host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from host2 log is in the
end. The LV in question is 6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is only call to lvs
and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM doesn't fully refresh.
The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM on host2, which
makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs in the SD VG?
Any suggestions where the problem might be?
Thanks!
Thread-998::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,399::BindingXMLRPC::965::vds::(wrapper) client
[10.10.0.10]::call vmCreate with ({'acpiEnable': 'true',
'emulatedMachine': 'pc-1.0', 'tabletEnable': 'true',
'vmId':
'4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3', 'memGuaranteedSize': 1024,
'spiceSslCipherSuite': 'DEFAULT', 'timeOffset': '0',
'cpuType':
'Penryn', 'custom': {}, 'smp': '1', 'vmType':
'kvm', 'memSize': 1024,
'smpCoresPerSocket': '1', 'vmName': 'testvm',
'nice': '0',
'smartcardEnable': 'false', 'keyboardLayout': 'en-us',
'kvmEnable':
'true', 'pitReinjection': 'false', 'transparentHugePages':
'true',
'devices': [{'device': 'cirrus', 'specParams':
{'vram': '32768',
'heads': '1'}, 'type': 'video', 'deviceId':
'9b769f44-db37-4e42-a343-408222e1422f'}, {'index': '2',
'iface': 'ide',
'specParams': {'path': ''}, 'readonly': 'true',
'deviceId':
'a61b291c-94de-4fd4-922e-1d51f4d2760d', 'path': '',
'device': 'cdrom',
'shared': 'false', 'type': 'disk'}, {'index': 0,
'iface': 'virtio',
'format': 'raw', 'bootOrder': '1', 'volumeID':
'6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280', 'imageID':
'3738d400-a62e-4ded-b97f-1b4028e5f45b', 'specParams': {},
'readonly':
'false', 'domainID': '3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7',
'optional':
'false', 'deviceId': '3738d400-a62e-4ded-b97f-1b4028e5f45b',
'poolID':
'61f15cc0-8bba-482d-8a81-cd636a581b58', 'device': 'disk',
'shared':
'false', 'propagateErrors': 'off', 'type':
'disk'}, {'device':
'memballoon', 'specParams': {'model': 'virtio'},
'type': 'balloon',
'deviceId': '4e05c1d1-2ac3-4885-8c1d-92ccd1388f0d'}, {'device':
'scsi',
'specParams': {}, 'model': 'virtio-scsi', 'type':
'controller',
'deviceId': 'fa3c223a-0cfc-4adf-90bc-cb6073a4b212'}],
'spiceSecureChannels':
'smain,sinputs,scursor,splayback,srecord,sdisplay,susbredir,ssmartcard',
'display': 'vnc'},) {} flowID [20468793]
Thread-998::INFO::2014-02-18
14:49:15,406::API::642::vds::(_getNetworkIp) network None: using 0
Thread-998::INFO::2014-02-18
14:49:15,406::clientIF::394::vds::(createVm) vmContainerLock acquired by
vm 4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,409::vm::2091::vm.Vm::(_startUnderlyingVm)
vmId=3D`4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3`::Start
Thread-998::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,409::clientIF::407::vds::(createVm) Total desktops after
creation of 4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3 is 1
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,409::vm::2095::vm.Vm::(_startUnderlyingVm)
vmId=3D`4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3`::_ongoingCreations acquired=
Thread-998::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,410::BindingXMLRPC::972::vds::(wrapper) return vmCreate with
{'status': {'message': 'Done', 'code': 0},
'vmList': {'status':
'WaitForLaunch', 'acpiEnable': 'true', 'emulatedMachine':
'pc-1.0',
'tabletEnable': 'true', 'pid': '0',
'memGuaranteedSize': 1024,
'timeOffset': '0', 'keyboardLayout': 'en-us',
'displayPort': '-1',
'displaySecurePort': '-1', 'spiceSslCipherSuite':
'DEFAULT', 'cpuType':
'Penryn', 'smp': '1', 'clientIp': '',
'nicModel': 'rtl8139,pv',
'smartcardEnable': 'false', 'kvmEnable': 'true',
'pitReinjection':
'false', 'vmId': '4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3',
'transparentHugePages': 'true', 'devices': [{'device':
'cirrus',
'specParams': {'vram': '32768', 'heads': '1'},
'type': 'video',
'deviceId': '9b769f44-db37-4e42-a343-408222e1422f'}, {'index':
'2',
'iface': 'ide', 'specParams': {'path': ''},
'readonly': 'true',
'deviceId': 'a61b291c-94de-4fd4-922e-1d51f4d2760d', 'path':
'',
'device': 'cdrom', 'shared': 'false', 'type':
'disk'}, {'index': 0,
'iface': 'virtio', 'format': 'raw', 'bootOrder':
'1', 'volumeID':
'6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280', 'imageID':
'3738d400-a62e-4ded-b97f-1b4028e5f45b', 'specParams': {},
'readonly':
'false', 'domainID': '3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7',
'optional':
'false', 'deviceId': '3738d400-a62e-4ded-b97f-1b4028e5f45b',
'poolID':
'61f15cc0-8bba-482d-8a81-cd636a581b58', 'device': 'disk',
'shared':
'false', 'propagateErrors': 'off', 'type':
'disk'}, {'device':
'memballoon', 'specParams': {'model': 'virtio'},
'type': 'balloon',
'deviceId': '4e05c1d1-2ac3-4885-8c1d-92ccd1388f0d'}, {'device':
'scsi',
'specParams': {}, 'model': 'virtio-scsi', 'type':
'controller',
'deviceId': 'fa3c223a-0cfc-4adf-90bc-cb6073a4b212'}], 'custom':
{},
'vmType': 'kvm', 'memSize': 1024, 'displayIp':
'0',
'spiceSecureChannels':
'smain,sinputs,scursor,splayback,srecord,sdisplay,susbredir,ssmartcard',
'smpCoresPerSocket': '1', 'vmName': 'testvm',
'display': 'vnc', 'nice':
'0'}}
Thread-999::INFO::2014-02-18 14:49:15,410::vm::2926::vm.Vm::(_run)
vmId=3D`4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3`::VM wrapper has started
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,412::task::579::TaskManager.Task::(_updateState)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::moving from state init ->
state preparing
Thread-999::INFO::2014-02-18
14:49:15,413::logUtils::44::dispatcher::(wrapper) Run and protect:
getVolumeSize(sdUUID=3D'3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7',
spUUID=3D'61f15cc0-8bba-482d-8a81-cd636a581b58',
imgUUID=3D'3738d400-a62e-4ded-b97f-1b4028e5f45b',
volUUID=3D'6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280', options=3DNone)
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,413::lvm::440::OperationMutex::(_reloadlvs) Operation 'lvm
reload operation' got the operation mutex
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,413::lvm::309::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(cmd) '/usr/bin/sudo -n
/sbin/lvm lvs --config " devices { preferred_names =3D
[\\"^/dev/mapper/\\"] ignore_suspended_devices=3D1 write_cache_state=3D0
disable_after_error_count=3D3 obtain_device_list_from_udev=3D0 filter =3D=
[
\'a|/dev/mapper/36090a098103b1821532d057a5a0120d4|/dev/mapper/36090a09810=
bb99fefb2da57b94332027|\',
\'r|.*|\' ] } global { locking_type=3D1 prioritise_write_locks=3D1
wait_for_locks=3D1 } backup { retain_min =3D 50 retain_days =3D 0 } "
--noheadings --units b --nosuffix --separator | -o
uuid,name,vg_name,attr,size,seg_start_pe,devices,tags
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7' (cwd None)
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,466::lvm::309::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(cmd) SUCCESS: <err> =3D '';=
<rc> =3D 0
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,481::lvm::475::Storage.LVM::(_reloadlvs) lvs reloaded
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,481::lvm::475::OperationMutex::(_reloadlvs) Operation 'lvm
reload operation' released the operation mutex
Thread-999::WARNING::2014-02-18
14:49:15,482::lvm::621::Storage.LVM::(getLv) lv:
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280 not found in lvs vg:
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7 response
Thread-999::ERROR::2014-02-18
14:49:15,482::task::850::TaskManager.Task::(_setError)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::Unexpected error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 857, in _run
return fn(*args, **kargs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/logUtils.py", line 45, in wrapper
res =3D f(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 3059, in getVolumeSize
apparentsize =3D str(volClass.getVSize(dom, imgUUID, volUUID, bs=3D1)=
)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/blockVolume.py", line 111, in getVSize
size =3D int(int(lvm.getLV(sdobj.sdUUID, volUUID).size) / bs)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/lvm.py", line 914, in getLV
raise se.LogicalVolumeDoesNotExistError("%s/%s" % (vgName, lvName))
LogicalVolumeDoesNotExistError: Logical volume does not exist:
('3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe32=
80',)
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,485::task::869::TaskManager.Task::(_run)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::Task._run:
07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d
('3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7',
'61f15cc0-8bba-482d-8a81-cd636a581b58',
'3738d400-a62e-4ded-b97f-1b4028e5f45b',
'6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280') {} failed - stopping task
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,485::task::1194::TaskManager.Task::(stop)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::stopping in state preparin=
g
(force False)
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,486::task::974::TaskManager.Task::(_decref)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::ref 1 aborting True
Thread-999::INFO::2014-02-18
14:49:15,486::task::1151::TaskManager.Task::(prepare)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::aborting: Task is aborted:=
'Logical volume does not exist' - code 610
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,486::task::1156::TaskManager.Task::(prepare)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::Prepare: aborted: Logical
volume does not exist
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,486::task::974::TaskManager.Task::(_decref)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::ref 0 aborting True
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,486::task::909::TaskManager.Task::(_doAbort)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::Task._doAbort: force False=
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,487::resourceManager::976::ResourceManager.Owner::(cancelAll)
Owner.cancelAll requests {}
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,487::task::579::TaskManager.Task::(_updateState)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::moving from state preparin=
g
-> state aborting
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,487::task::534::TaskManager.Task::(__state_aborting)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::_aborting: recover policy =
none
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,487::task::579::TaskManager.Task::(_updateState)
Task=3D`07adf25e-b9fe-44d0-adf4-9159ac0f1f4d`::moving from state aborting=
-> state failed
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,487::resourceManager::939::ResourceManager.Owner::(releaseAll)
Owner.releaseAll requests {} resources {}
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,488::resourceManager::976::ResourceManager.Owner::(cancelAll)
Owner.cancelAll requests {}
Thread-999::ERROR::2014-02-18
14:49:15,488::dispatcher::67::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run)
{'status': {'message': "Logical volume does not exist:
('3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe32=
80',)",
'code': 610}}
Thread-999::ERROR::2014-02-18
14:49:15,488::vm::1826::vm.Vm::(_normalizeVdsmImg)
vmId=3D`4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3`::Unable to get volume size
for 6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/vdsm/vm.py", line 1822, in _normalizeVdsmImg
drv['truesize'] =3D res['truesize']
KeyError: 'truesize'
Thread-999::DEBUG::2014-02-18
14:49:15,489::vm::2112::vm.Vm::(_startUnderlyingVm)
vmId=3D`4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3`::_ongoingCreations released=
Thread-999::ERROR::2014-02-18
14:49:15,489::vm::2138::vm.Vm::(_startUnderlyingVm)
vmId=3D`4669e4ad-7b76-4531-a16b-2b85345593a3`::The vm start process faile=
d
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/vdsm/vm.py", line 2098, in _startUnderlyingVm
self._run()
File "/usr/share/vdsm/vm.py", line 2930, in _run
devices =3D self.buildConfDevices()
File "/usr/share/vdsm/vm.py", line 1935, in buildConfDevices
self._normalizeVdsmImg(drv)
File "/usr/share/vdsm/vm.py", line 1828, in _normalizeVdsmImg
drv['volumeID'])
RuntimeError: Volume 6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280 is corrupted
or missing
Best regards,
Boyan Tabakov
--kNwttSRPs68koQxvdSI5KDEeiPmQG9f68
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMDYX8ACgkQXOXFG4fgV77amACfdaldO8NlpTry88hrRrdH6eGk
umQAoMNVB+zEV4gO+SunFLjuyq8J0pL0
=m0Qx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--kNwttSRPs68koQxvdSI5KDEeiPmQG9f68--
6:09 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
To: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:34:49 PM
Subject: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on some nodes
Hello,
I have ovirt 3.3 installed on on FC 19 hosts with vdsm 4.13.3-2.fc19.
Which version of ovirt 3.3 is this? (3.3.2? 3.3.3?)
One of the hosts (host1) is engine + node + SPM and the other host2
is
just a node. I have an iSCSI storage domain configured and accessible
from both nodes.
When creating a new disk in the SD, the underlying logical volume gets
properly created (seen in vgdisplay output on host1), but doesn't seem
to be automatically picked by host2.
How do you know it is not seen on host2?
Consequently, when creating/booting
a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start on host2,
because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is started on
host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from host2 log is in the
end. The LV in question is 6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is only call to lvs
and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM doesn't fully refresh.
The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM on host2, which
makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs in the SD VG?
Any suggestions where the problem might be?
When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new lv should be
visible on the other host. Lets start by verifying that you do see
the new lv after a disk was created.
Try this:
1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the engine ui
2. On another machine, run this command:
lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
You can identify the new lv using tags, which should contain the new disk uuid.
If you don't see the new lv from the other host, please provide /var/log/messages
and /var/log/sanlock.log.
Thanks,
Nir
8:18 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--ODRkdRPhuAd6KEcf9OhiQ3AkS3jDuGPGs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
On 19.2.2014, 17:09, Nir Soffer wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
> To: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:34:49 PM
> Subject: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on som=
e
nodes
>
> Hello,
>
> I have ovirt 3.3 installed on on FC 19 hosts with vdsm 4.13.3-2.fc19.
=20
Which version of ovirt 3.3 is this? (3.3.2? 3.3.3?)
ovirt-engine is 3.3.2-1.fc19
> One of the hosts (host1) is engine + node + SPM and the other
host2 is=
> just a node. I have an iSCSI storage domain configured and
accessible
> from both nodes.
>
> When creating a new disk in the SD, the underlying logical volume gets=
> properly created (seen in vgdisplay output on host1), but
doesn't seem=
> to be automatically picked by host2.
=20
How do you know it is not seen on host2?
It's not present in the output of vgdisplay -v nor vgs.
=20
> Consequently, when creating/booting
> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start on host2,
> because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is started on
> host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from host2 log is in the
> end. The LV in question is 6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
>
> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is only call to l=
vs
> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM doesn't fully
refresh.
> The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM on host2, which
> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
>
> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs in the SD VG?
> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
=20
When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new lv should be
visible on the other host. Lets start by verifying that you do see
the new lv after a disk was created.=20
=20
Try this:
=20
1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the engine ui
2. On another machine, run this command:
=20
lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
=20
You can identify the new lv using tags, which should contain the new di=
sk uuid.
=20
If you don't see the new lv from the other host, please provide /var/lo=
g/messages
and /var/log/sanlock.log.
Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM node.
On the SPM node (where the LV is visible in vgs output):
Feb 19 19:10:43 host1 vdsm root WARNING File:
/rhev/data-center/61f15cc0-8bba-482d-8a81-cd636a581b58/3307f6fa-dd58-43db=
-ab23-b1fb299006c7/images/4d15543c-4c45-4c23-bbe3-f10b9084472a/3e0ce8cb-3=
740-49d7-908e-d025875ac9a2
already removed
Feb 19 19:10:45 host1 multipathd: dm-65: remove map (uevent)
Feb 19 19:10:45 host1 multipathd: dm-65: devmap not registered, can't rem=
ove
Feb 19 19:10:45 host1 multipathd: dm-65: remove map (uevent)
Feb 19 19:10:54 host1 kernel: [1652684.864746] dd: sending ioctl
80306d02 to a partition!
Feb 19 19:10:54 host1 kernel: [1652684.963931] dd: sending ioctl
80306d02 to a partition!
No recent entries in sanlock.log on the SPM node.
On the non-SPM node (the one that doesn't show the LV in vgs output),
there are no relevant entries in /var/log/messages. Here's the full
sanlock.log for that host:
2014-01-30 16:28:09+0200 1324 [2335]: sanlock daemon started 2.8 host
18bd0a27-c280-4007-98f2-d2e7e73cd8b5.xenon.futu
2014-01-30 16:59:51+0200 5 [609]: sanlock daemon started 2.8 host
4a7627e2-296a-4e48-a7e2-f6bcecac07ab.xenon.futu
2014-01-31 09:51:43+0200 60717 [614]: s1 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb2=
99006c7/ids:0
2014-01-31 16:03:51+0200 83045 [613]: s1:r1 resource
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:SDM:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1f=
b299006c7/leases:1048576
for 8,16,30268
2014-01-31 16:18:01+0200 83896 [614]: s1:r2 resource
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:SDM:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1f=
b299006c7/leases:1048576
for 8,16,30268
2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
0x7fc37c0008c0:0x7fc37c0008d0:0x7fc391f5f000 ioto 10 to_count 1
2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
delta_length 10 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:21+0200 563076 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
0x7fc37c000910:0x7fc37c000920:0x7fc391d5c000 ioto 10 to_count 2
2014-02-06 05:24:21+0200 563076 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:24:21+0200 563076 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
delta_length 11 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:32+0200 563087 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
0x7fc37c000960:0x7fc37c000970:0x7fc391c5a000 ioto 10 to_count 3
2014-02-06 05:24:32+0200 563087 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:24:32+0200 563087 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
delta_length 11 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:40+0200 563094 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 60
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:41+0200 563095 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 61
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:42+0200 563096 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 62
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563097 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 63
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563098 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
0x7fc37c0009b0:0x7fc37c0009c0:0x7fc391b58000 ioto 10 to_count 4
2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563098 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563098 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
delta_length 11 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:44+0200 563098 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 64
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:45+0200 563099 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 65
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:46+0200 563100 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 66
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:47+0200 563101 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 67
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:48+0200 563102 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 68
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:49+0200 563103 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 69
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:50+0200 563104 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 70
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:51+0200 563105 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 71
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:52+0200 563106 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 72
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:53+0200 563107 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 73
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:54+0200 563108 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 74
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:54+0200 563109 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -2
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:24:54+0200 563109 [31453]: s1 renewal error -2
delta_length 11 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:55+0200 563109 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 75
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:56+0200 563110 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 76
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:57+0200 563111 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 77
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:58+0200 563112 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 78
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:59+0200 563113 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 79
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:25:00+0200 563114 [609]: s1 check_our_lease failed 80
2014-02-06 05:25:00+0200 563114 [609]: s1 all pids clear
2014-02-06 05:25:05+0200 563119 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -2
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:25:05+0200 563119 [31453]: s1 renewal error -2
delta_length 10 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
0x7fc37c0008c0:0x7fc37c0008d0:0x7fc391f5f000 result 1048576:0 close free
2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
0x7fc37c000910:0x7fc37c000920:0x7fc391d5c000 result 1048576:0 close free
2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
0x7fc37c000960:0x7fc37c000970:0x7fc391c5a000 result 1048576:0 close free
2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
0x7fc37c0009b0:0x7fc37c0009c0:0x7fc391b58000 result 1048576:0 close free
2014-02-06 05:26:09+0200 563183 [614]: s2 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb2=
99006c7/ids:0
2014-02-18 14:22:16+0200 1632150 [614]: s3 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb2=
99006c7/ids:0
2014-02-18 14:38:16+0200 1633111 [614]: s4 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb2=
99006c7/ids:0
2014-02-18 16:13:07+0200 1638801 [613]: s5 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb2=
99006c7/ids:0
2014-02-18 19:28:09+0200 1650504 [614]: s6 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb2=
99006c7/ids:0
Last entry is from yesterday, while I just created a new disk.
Let me know if you need more info!
Thanks,
Boyan
--ODRkdRPhuAd6KEcf9OhiQ3AkS3jDuGPGs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlME53kACgkQXOXFG4fgV77TkwCaAzd6obB6duelJTJzhL8x5h1d
KeMAoKjR6obG7yEFHV7Il+pY6f2+uRuc
=5APL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ODRkdRPhuAd6KEcf9OhiQ3AkS3jDuGPGs--
11:19 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:18:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on some nodes
Hello,
On 19.2.2014, 17:09, Nir Soffer wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>> To: users(a)ovirt.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:34:49 PM
>> Subject: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on some
>> nodes
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have ovirt 3.3 installed on on FC 19 hosts with vdsm 4.13.3-2.fc19.
>
> Which version of ovirt 3.3 is this? (3.3.2? 3.3.3?)
ovirt-engine is 3.3.2-1.fc19
>> One of the hosts (host1) is engine + node + SPM and the other host2 is
>> just a node. I have an iSCSI storage domain configured and accessible
>> from both nodes.
>>
>> When creating a new disk in the SD, the underlying logical volume gets
>> properly created (seen in vgdisplay output on host1), but doesn't seem
>> to be automatically picked by host2.
>
> How do you know it is not seen on host2?
It's not present in the output of vgdisplay -v nor vgs.
>
>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start on host2,
>> because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is started on
>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from host2 log is in the
>> end. The LV in question is 6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
>>
>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is only call to lvs
>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM doesn't fully refresh.
>> The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM on host2, which
>> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
>>
>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs in the SD VG?
>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
>
> When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new lv should be
> visible on the other host. Lets start by verifying that you do see
> the new lv after a disk was created.
>
> Try this:
>
> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the engine ui
> 2. On another machine, run this command:
>
> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>
> You can identify the new lv using tags, which should contain the new disk
> uuid.
>
> If you don't see the new lv from the other host, please provide
> /var/log/messages
> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM node.
This means that storage is not accessible from this host.
On the SPM node (where the LV is visible in vgs output):
Feb 19 19:10:43 host1 vdsm root WARNING File:
/rhev/data-center/61f15cc0-8bba-482d-8a81-cd636a581b58/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/images/4d15543c-4c45-4c23-bbe3-f10b9084472a/3e0ce8cb-3740-49d7-908e-d025875ac9a2
already removed
Feb 19 19:10:45 host1 multipathd: dm-65: remove map (uevent)
Feb 19 19:10:45 host1 multipathd: dm-65: devmap not registered, can't remove
Feb 19 19:10:45 host1 multipathd: dm-65: remove map (uevent)
Feb 19 19:10:54 host1 kernel: [1652684.864746] dd: sending ioctl
80306d02 to a partition!
Feb 19 19:10:54 host1 kernel: [1652684.963931] dd: sending ioctl
80306d02 to a partition!
No recent entries in sanlock.log on the SPM node.
On the non-SPM node (the one that doesn't show the LV in vgs output),
there are no relevant entries in /var/log/messages.
Strange - sanlock errors are logged to /var/log/messages. It would be helpful if
you attach this log - we may find something in it.
Here's the full
sanlock.log for that host:
2014-01-30 16:28:09+0200 1324 [2335]: sanlock daemon started 2.8 host
18bd0a27-c280-4007-98f2-d2e7e73cd8b5.xenon.futu
2014-01-30 16:59:51+0200 5 [609]: sanlock daemon started 2.8 host
4a7627e2-296a-4e48-a7e2-f6bcecac07ab.xenon.futu
2014-01-31 09:51:43+0200 60717 [614]: s1 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids:0
2014-01-31 16:03:51+0200 83045 [613]: s1:r1 resource
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:SDM:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/leases:1048576
for 8,16,30268
2014-01-31 16:18:01+0200 83896 [614]: s1:r2 resource
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:SDM:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/leases:1048576
for 8,16,30268
2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
0x7fc37c0008c0:0x7fc37c0008d0:0x7fc391f5f000 ioto 10 to_count 1
2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
Sanlock cannot write to the ids lockspace
2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
delta_length 10 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:21+0200 563076 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
0x7fc37c000910:0x7fc37c000920:0x7fc391d5c000 ioto 10 to_count 2
2014-02-06 05:24:21+0200 563076 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:24:21+0200 563076 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
delta_length 11 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:32+0200 563087 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
0x7fc37c000960:0x7fc37c000970:0x7fc391c5a000 ioto 10 to_count 3
2014-02-06 05:24:32+0200 563087 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:24:32+0200 563087 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
delta_length 11 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:40+0200 563094 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 60
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:41+0200 563095 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 61
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:42+0200 563096 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 62
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563097 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 63
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563098 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
0x7fc37c0009b0:0x7fc37c0009c0:0x7fc391b58000 ioto 10 to_count 4
2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563098 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563098 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
delta_length 11 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:44+0200 563098 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 64
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:45+0200 563099 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 65
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:46+0200 563100 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 66
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:47+0200 563101 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 67
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:48+0200 563102 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 68
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:49+0200 563103 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 69
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:50+0200 563104 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 70
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:51+0200 563105 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 71
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:52+0200 563106 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 72
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:53+0200 563107 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 73
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:54+0200 563108 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 74
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:54+0200 563109 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -2
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:24:54+0200 563109 [31453]: s1 renewal error -2
delta_length 11 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:55+0200 563109 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 75
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:56+0200 563110 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 76
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:57+0200 563111 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 77
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:58+0200 563112 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 78
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:24:59+0200 563113 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 79
last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:25:00+0200 563114 [609]: s1 check_our_lease failed 80
2014-02-06 05:25:00+0200 563114 [609]: s1 all pids clear
2014-02-06 05:25:05+0200 563119 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -2
offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
2014-02-06 05:25:05+0200 563119 [31453]: s1 renewal error -2
delta_length 10 last_success 563034
2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
0x7fc37c000910 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
0x7fc37c000960 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
0x7fc37c0008c0:0x7fc37c0008d0:0x7fc391f5f000 result 1048576:0 close free
2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
0x7fc37c000910:0x7fc37c000920:0x7fc391d5c000 result 1048576:0 close free
2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
0x7fc37c000960:0x7fc37c000970:0x7fc391c5a000 result 1048576:0 close free
2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
0x7fc37c0009b0:0x7fc37c0009c0:0x7fc391b58000 result 1048576:0 close free
2014-02-06 05:26:09+0200 563183 [614]: s2 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids:0
Sanlock can access the storage again - did you change something around this time?
2014-02-18 14:22:16+0200 1632150 [614]: s3 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids:0
2014-02-18 14:38:16+0200 1633111 [614]: s4 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids:0
2014-02-18 16:13:07+0200 1638801 [613]: s5 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids:0
2014-02-18 19:28:09+0200 1650504 [614]: s6 lockspace
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids:0
Last entry is from yesterday, while I just created a new disk.
What was the status of this host in the engine from 2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 to 2014-02-18
14:22:16?
vdsm.log and engine.log for this time frame will make it more clear.
Nir
12:53 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--vM4t7FopnCM1lptRhWjrucQQXAOXW89bk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
On 22.2.2014, 22:19, Nir Soffer wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:18:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on=
some nodes
>
> Hello,
>
> On 19.2.2014, 17:09, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>> To: users(a)ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:34:49 PM
>>> Subject: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on s=
ome
>>> nodes
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have ovirt 3.3 installed on on FC 19 hosts with vdsm 4.13.3-2.fc19=
=2E
>>
>> Which version of ovirt 3.3 is this? (3.3.2? 3.3.3?)
>
> ovirt-engine is 3.3.2-1.fc19
>
>>> One of the hosts (host1) is engine + node + SPM and the other host2 =
is
>>> just a node. I have an iSCSI storage domain configured
and accessibl=
e
>>> from both nodes.
>>>
>>> When creating a new disk in the SD, the underlying logical volume ge=
ts
>>> properly created (seen in vgdisplay output on host1), but
doesn't se=
em
>>> to be automatically picked by host2.
>>
>> How do you know it is not seen on host2?
>
> It's not present in the output of vgdisplay -v nor vgs.
>
>>
>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start on host2,
>>> because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is started on
>>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from host2 log is in th=
e
>>> end. The LV in question is
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
>>>
>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is only call to=
lvs
>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM
doesn't fully refresh=
=2E
>>> The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM on
host2, which
>>> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
>>>
>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs in the SD VG=
?
>>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
>>
>> When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new lv should be
>> visible on the other host. Lets start by verifying that you do see
>> the new lv after a disk was created.
>>
>> Try this:
>>
>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the engine ui
>> 2. On another machine, run this command:
>>
>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>>
>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which should contain the new =
disk
>> uuid.
>>
>> If you don't see the new lv from the other host, please provide
>> /var/log/messages
>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
>
> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM node.
=20
This means that storage is not accessible from this host.
Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example, if I restart
the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up correctly (become visible in lvs
output and VMs can be started with them).
=20
>
> On the SPM node (where the LV is visible in vgs output):
>
> Feb 19 19:10:43 host1 vdsm root WARNING File:
> /rhev/data-center/61f15cc0-8bba-482d-8a81-cd636a581b58/3307f6fa-dd58-4=
3db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/images/4d15543c-4c45-4c23-bbe3-f10b9084472a/3e0ce8c=
b-3740-49d7-908e-d025875ac9a2
> already removed
> Feb 19 19:10:45 host1 multipathd: dm-65: remove map (uevent)
> Feb 19 19:10:45 host1 multipathd: dm-65: devmap not registered, can't =
remove
> Feb 19 19:10:45 host1 multipathd: dm-65: remove map (uevent)
> Feb 19 19:10:54 host1 kernel: [1652684.864746] dd: sending ioctl
> 80306d02 to a partition!
> Feb 19 19:10:54 host1 kernel: [1652684.963931] dd: sending ioctl
> 80306d02 to a partition!
>
> No recent entries in sanlock.log on the SPM node.
>
> On the non-SPM node (the one that doesn't show the LV in vgs output),
> there are no relevant entries in /var/log/messages.
=20
Strange - sanlock errors are logged to /var/log/messages. It would be h=
elpful if
you attach this log - we may find something in it.
No entries appear in /var/log/messages, other than the quoted above
(Sorry, I didn't clarify that that was from /var/log/messages on host1).
=20
> Here's the full
> sanlock.log for that host:
>
> 2014-01-30 16:28:09+0200 1324 [2335]: sanlock daemon started 2.8 host
> 18bd0a27-c280-4007-98f2-d2e7e73cd8b5.xenon.futu
> 2014-01-30 16:59:51+0200 5 [609]: sanlock daemon started 2.8 host
> 4a7627e2-296a-4e48-a7e2-f6bcecac07ab.xenon.futu
> 2014-01-31 09:51:43+0200 60717 [614]: s1 lockspace
> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1=
fb299006c7/ids:0
> 2014-01-31 16:03:51+0200 83045 [613]: s1:r1 resource
> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:SDM:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-=
b1fb299006c7/leases:1048576
> for 8,16,30268
> 2014-01-31 16:18:01+0200 83896 [614]: s1:r2 resource
> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:SDM:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-=
b1fb299006c7/leases:1048576
> for 8,16,30268
> 2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
> 0x7fc37c0008c0:0x7fc37c0008d0:0x7fc391f5f000 ioto 10 to_count 1
> 2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
> offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
=20
Sanlock cannot write to the ids lockspace
Which line shows that sanlock can't write? The messages are not very
"human readable".
=20
> 2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
> delta_length 10 last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:21+0200 563076 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
> 0x7fc37c000910:0x7fc37c000920:0x7fc391d5c000 ioto 10 to_count 2
> 2014-02-06 05:24:21+0200 563076 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
> offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
> 2014-02-06 05:24:21+0200 563076 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
> delta_length 11 last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:32+0200 563087 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
> 0x7fc37c000960:0x7fc37c000970:0x7fc391c5a000 ioto 10 to_count 3
> 2014-02-06 05:24:32+0200 563087 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
> offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
> 2014-02-06 05:24:32+0200 563087 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
> delta_length 11 last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:40+0200 563094 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 60
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:41+0200 563095 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 61
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:42+0200 563096 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 62
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563097 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 63
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563098 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio timeout 0
> 0x7fc37c0009b0:0x7fc37c0009c0:0x7fc391b58000 ioto 10 to_count 4
> 2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563098 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
> offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
> 2014-02-06 05:24:43+0200 563098 [31453]: s1 renewal error -202
> delta_length 11 last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:44+0200 563098 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 64
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:45+0200 563099 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 65
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:46+0200 563100 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 66
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:47+0200 563101 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 67
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:48+0200 563102 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 68
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:49+0200 563103 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 69
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:50+0200 563104 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 70
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:51+0200 563105 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 71
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:52+0200 563106 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 72
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:53+0200 563107 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 73
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:54+0200 563108 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 74
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:54+0200 563109 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -2
> offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
> 2014-02-06 05:24:54+0200 563109 [31453]: s1 renewal error -2
> delta_length 11 last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:55+0200 563109 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 75
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:56+0200 563110 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 76
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:57+0200 563111 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 77
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:58+0200 563112 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 78
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:24:59+0200 563113 [609]: s1 check_our_lease warning 79
> last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:25:00+0200 563114 [609]: s1 check_our_lease failed 80
> 2014-02-06 05:25:00+0200 563114 [609]: s1 all pids clear
> 2014-02-06 05:25:05+0200 563119 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -2
> offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
> 2014-02-06 05:25:05+0200 563119 [31453]: s1 renewal error -2
> delta_length 10 last_success 563034
> 2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
> 0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
> 0x7fc37c000910 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
> 0x7fc37c000960 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:15+0200 563129 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
> 0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
> 0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
> 0x7fc37c000910 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
> 0x7fc37c000960 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:25+0200 563139 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
> 0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
> 0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
> 0x7fc37c000910 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
> 0x7fc37c000960 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:35+0200 563149 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
> 0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
> 0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
> 0x7fc37c000910 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
> 0x7fc37c000960 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:45+0200 563159 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
> 0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 0
> 0x7fc37c0008c0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 1
> 0x7fc37c000910 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 2
> 0x7fc37c000960 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:55+0200 563169 [31453]: 3307f6fa close_task_aio 3
> 0x7fc37c0009b0 busy
> 2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
> 0x7fc37c0008c0:0x7fc37c0008d0:0x7fc391f5f000 result 1048576:0 close fr=
ee
> 2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
> 0x7fc37c000910:0x7fc37c000920:0x7fc391d5c000 result 1048576:0 close fr=
ee
> 2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
> 0x7fc37c000960:0x7fc37c000970:0x7fc391c5a000 result 1048576:0 close fr=
ee
> 2014-02-06 05:25:59+0200 563173 [31453]: 3307f6fa aio collect
> 0x7fc37c0009b0:0x7fc37c0009c0:0x7fc391b58000 result 1048576:0 close fr=
ee
> 2014-02-06 05:26:09+0200 563183 [614]: s2 lockspace
> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1=
fb299006c7/ids:0
=20
Sanlock can access the storage again - did you change something around =
this
time?
Unfortunately, I can't recall. The node was generally used during
between 6th and 18th, but all running VMs used directly attached iSCSI
disks, instead of disks from the Storage Domain. I don't think any
configuration changes were done to wither the host, nor storage at that
time.
=20
> 2014-02-18 14:22:16+0200 1632150 [614]: s3 lockspace
> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1=
fb299006c7/ids:0
> 2014-02-18 14:38:16+0200 1633111 [614]: s4 lockspace
> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1=
fb299006c7/ids:0
> 2014-02-18 16:13:07+0200 1638801 [613]: s5 lockspace
> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1=
fb299006c7/ids:0
> 2014-02-18 19:28:09+0200 1650504 [614]: s6 lockspace
> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:2:/dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1=
fb299006c7/ids:0
>
> Last entry is from yesterday, while I just created a new disk.
=20
What was the status of this host in the engine from 2014-02-06 05:24:10=
+0200 to
2014-02-18 14:22:16?
=20
vdsm.log and engine.log for this time frame will make it more clear.
=20
Nir
=20
Host was up and running. The vdsm and engine logs are quite large, as we
were running some VM migrations between the hosts. Any pointers at what
to look for? For example, I noticed many entries in engine.log like this:=
2014-02-24 17:02:26,635 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.VdsManager]
(DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-46) OnVdsDuringFailureTimer of vds host2
entered. Attempts after -580
The "attempt after" number continues to decrease by one every half hour.
There was probably some issue on 02.06, I can see this in engine log:
2014-02-06 05:25:03,078 WARN
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand]
(pool-6-thread-48) domain
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:OtaverkkoDefault in problem. vds: ho=
st2
2014-02-06 05:26:34,126 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand]
(pool-6-thread-48) Domain
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:OtaverkkoDefault recovered from
problem. vds: host2
2014-02-06 05:26:34,135 INFO
[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsBrokerCommand]
(pool-6-thread-48) Domain
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7:OtaverkkoDefault has recovered from
problem. No active host in the DC is reporting it as problematic, so
clearing the domain recovery timer.
However, that was probably temporary.
At the moment, if I force host2 to become SPM, then the issue repeats -
this time host1 doesn't pick up newly created disks (and again, no
messages in /var/log/messages or sanlock). So, I don't think there is
issue with connection to storage on one host.
What exactly is the mechanism by which the non-SPM nodes should pick up
newly created disks? Is the engine sending them command to refresh, or
are they supposed to monitor the metadata of the Storage Domain volume
group?
One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes is this:
Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo) VG
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size exceeded
critical size: mdasize=3D134217728 mdafree=3D0
This was happening even when the storage domain was newly created and
there were only one or two disks on it! I can't imagine how that could
be "too many".
Thanks,
Boyan
--vM4t7FopnCM1lptRhWjrucQQXAOXW89bk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMMaC8ACgkQXOXFG4fgV77ZVACgtoEt4Dc4xM1bTYyzL3QB8L4t
9EYAn2aYffGrecX+9+qDNvyfDCUMXKwy
=9uyU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vM4t7FopnCM1lptRhWjrucQQXAOXW89bk--
9:05 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 11:53:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on some nodes
Hello,
On 22.2.2014, 22:19, Nir Soffer wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:18:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on
>> some nodes
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 19.2.2014, 17:09, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>>> To: users(a)ovirt.org
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:34:49 PM
>>>> Subject: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on
some
>>>> nodes
>>>
>>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start on host2,
>>>> because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is started on
>>>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from host2 log is in the
>>>> end. The LV in question is 6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
>>>>
>>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is only call to
lvs
>>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM doesn't fully
refresh.
lvs should see any change on the shared storage.
>>>> The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM
on host2, which
>>>> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
When vdsm starts, it calls multipath -r, which ensure that we see all physical volumes.
>>>>
>>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs in the SD VG?
>>>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
>>>
>>> When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new lv should be
>>> visible on the other host. Lets start by verifying that you do see
>>> the new lv after a disk was created.
>>>
>>> Try this:
>>>
>>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the engine ui
>>> 2. On another machine, run this command:
>>>
>>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>>>
>>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which should contain the new disk
>>> uuid.
>>>
>>> If you don't see the new lv from the other host, please provide
>>> /var/log/messages
>>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
>>
>> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM node.
>
> This means that storage is not accessible from this host.
Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example, if I restart
the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up correctly (become visible in lvs
output and VMs can be started with them).
Lests repeat this test, but now, if you do not see the new lv, please
run:
multipath -r
And report the results.
>> Here's the full
>> sanlock.log for that host:
...
>> 0x7fc37c0008c0:0x7fc37c0008d0:0x7fc391f5f000 ioto 10 to_count 1
>> 2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202
>> offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
>
> Sanlock cannot write to the ids lockspace
Which line shows that sanlock can't write? The messages are not very
"human readable".
The one above my comment at 2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200
I suggest to set sanlock debug level on the sanlock log to get more detailed output.
Edit /etc/sysconfig/sanlock and add:
# -L 7: use debug level logging to sanlock log file
SANLOCKOPTS="$SANLOCKOPTS -L 7"
>>
>> Last entry is from yesterday, while I just created a new disk.
>
> What was the status of this host in the engine from 2014-02-06
> 05:24:10+0200 to 2014-02-18 14:22:16?
>
> vdsm.log and engine.log for this time frame will make it more clear.
Host was up and running. The vdsm and engine logs are quite large, as we
were running some VM migrations between the hosts. Any pointers at what
to look for? For example, I noticed many entries in engine.log like this:
It will be hard to make any progress without the logs.
One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes is this:
Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo) VG
3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size exceeded
critical size: mdasize=134217728 mdafree=0
Can you share the output of the command bellow?
lvs -o
uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name
I suggest that you open a bug and attach there engine.log, /var/log/messages, vdsm.log
and sanlock.log.
Please also give detailed info on the host os, vdsm version etc.
Nir
10:51 a.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--LREaOVJqkWp8iv9aCReT65xDKv7JE33We
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 28.2.2014, 20:05, Nir Soffer wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 11:53:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on=
some nodes
>
> Hello,
>
> On 22.2.2014, 22:19, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:18:36 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated =
on
>>> some nodes
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 19.2.2014, 17:09, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>>>> To: users(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:34:49 PM
>>>>> Subject: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated
on=
some
>>>>> nodes
>>>>
>>>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>>>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start on host2,
>>>>> because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is started
on=
>>>>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from
host2 log is in =
the
>>>>> end. The LV in question is
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is only call =
to lvs
>>>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM
doesn't fully refre=
sh.
=20
lvs should see any change on the shared storage.
=20
>>>>> The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM on host2, whic=
h
>>>>> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
=20
When vdsm starts, it calls multipath -r, which ensure that we see all p=
hysical
volumes.
=20
>>>>>
>>>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs in the SD =
VG?
>>>>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
>>>>
>>>> When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new lv should b=
e
>>>> visible on the other host. Lets start by verifying
that you do see
>>>> the new lv after a disk was created.
>>>>
>>>> Try this:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the engine ui
>>>> 2. On another machine, run this command:
>>>>
>>>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>>>>
>>>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which should contain the ne=
w disk
>>>> uuid.
>>>>
>>>> If you don't see the new lv from the other host, please provide
>>>> /var/log/messages
>>>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
>>>
>>> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM node.
>>
>> This means that storage is not accessible from this host.
>
> Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example, if I restart
> the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up correctly (become visible in lvs
> output and VMs can be started with them).
=20
Lests repeat this test, but now, if you do not see the new lv, please=20
run:
=20
multipath -r
=20
And report the results.
=20
Running multipath -r helped and the disk was properly picked up by the
second host.
Is running multipath -r safe while host is not in maintenance mode? If
yes, as a temporary workaround I can patch vdsmd to run multipath -r
when e.g. monitoring the storage domain.
>>> Here's the full
>>> sanlock.log for that host:
> ...
>>> 0x7fc37c0008c0:0x7fc37c0008d0:0x7fc391f5f000 ioto 10 to_count 1
>>> 2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200 563065 [31453]: s1 delta_renew read rv -202=
>>> offset 0 /dev/3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7/ids
>>
>> Sanlock cannot write to the ids lockspace
>
> Which line shows that sanlock can't write? The messages are not very
> "human readable".
=20
The one above my comment at 2014-02-06 05:24:10+0200
=20
I suggest to set sanlock debug level on the sanlock log to get more det=
ailed
output.
=20
Edit /etc/sysconfig/sanlock and add:
=20
# -L 7: use debug level logging to sanlock log file
SANLOCKOPTS=3D"$SANLOCKOPTS -L 7"
=20
>>>
>>> Last entry is from yesterday, while I just created a new disk.
>>
>> What was the status of this host in the engine from 2014-02-06
>> 05:24:10+0200 to 2014-02-18 14:22:16?
>>
>> vdsm.log and engine.log for this time frame will make it more clear.
>
> Host was up and running. The vdsm and engine logs are quite large, as =
we
> were running some VM migrations between the hosts. Any pointers
at wha=
t
> to look for? For example, I noticed many entries in engine.log
like th=
is:
=20
It will be hard to make any progress without the logs.
=20
>
> One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes is this:
>
> Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
> 16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo) VG
> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size exceeded
> critical size: mdasize=3D134217728 mdafree=3D0
=20
Can you share the output of the command bellow?
=20
lvs -o uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count=
,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name
Here's the output for both hosts.
host1:
[root@host1 ~]# lvs -o
uuid,name,attr,size,vg_free,vg_extent_size,vg_extent_count,vg_free_count,=
tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count
LV UUID LV
Attr LSize VFree Ext #Ext Free LV Tags
VMdaSize VMdaFree #LV #PV
jGEpVm-oPW8-XyxI-l2yi-YF4X-qteQ-dm8SqL
3d362bf2-20f4-438d-9ba9-486bd2e8cedf -wi-ao--- 2.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d42e7b760036,MD_5,PU_f4231952-76c5-4764-9c8b-a=
c73492ac465
128.00m 0 13 2
ltJOs7-T7yE-faQd-MkD8-PS5F-wGXU-nmDQrC
3e147e83-0b0c-4cb8-b46f-67c8dc62756e -wi------ 7.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
IU_bdf2c305-194c-45b5-bd62-1bf01b05e286,MD_7,PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-0=
00000000000
128.00m 0 13 2
YxR9Df-YfvQ-0W5s-5CnC-JGN6-gQug-vi5R4n
57668a89-c5ca-4231-b18a-dd0607e459a5 -wi------ 10.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,MD_10,IU_90f2b1e5-59f7-4bed-97a9-=
f02d683f07f8
128.00m 0 13 2
FeqoWr-aYs1-N4M6-Miss-lMec-afKk-7XJKpf
637bdaf7-61cb-4feb-838d-24355367dcec -wi------ 7.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,IU_e2dafaea-71f5-4f60-abc1-0c7bf2=
feb223,MD_9
128.00m 0 13 2
9xWhSv-g5ps-utzj-eXfz-G8Zz-BdkN-hN8wGE
65a711a2-d08a-496a-93de-e47aec19cfb1 -wi------ 12.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
IU_91d741e3-19b7-40bd-8b96-de48caa161f1,PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000=
000000,MD_8
128.00m 0 13 2
Isn11q-cokl-op59-vQcl-l4Rc-Uaeg-1lcGqd
f4231952-76c5-4764-9c8b-ac73492ac465 -wi-ao--- 3.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
MD_4,PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d=
42e7b760036
128.00m 0 13 2
u80jcl-PPVX-nRp6-KDqH-ZcRI-IAuU-JMrqK0
f8f7d099-3e54-45c0-8f4b-3ee25901522e -wi-ao--- 40.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
MD_6,PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,IU_d5a37063-66bb-4bf1-9269-e=
ae7f136d7e1
128.00m 0 13 2
h9SB9I-J9Dm-mTIL-lT6T-ZxvF-8mHj-eAs59A ids
-wi-ao--- 128.00m 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
rrycOM-WkBu-1VLg-RYrd-z7bO-8nS9-CkLpqc inbox
-wi-a---- 128.00m 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
IDjyMT-Quxu-NxG8-dKfz-CSlc-i1EQ-o8rlSb leases
-wi-a---- 2.00g 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
sTxbVK-5YDT-H7nw-53b9-Av7J-YIzP-res2b1 master
-wi-ao--- 1.00g 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
2lwYGv-cZop-7Jj9-vYFI-RDEZ-1hKy-oXNbei metadata
-wi-a---- 512.00m 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
NznWRR-kLhp-HEMw-0c7P-9XIj-YiXb-oYFovC outbox
-wi-a---- 128.00m 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
JTDXAM-vMQI-UY0o-Axy9-UQKv-7Hl7-M9XSwQ mysql
-wi-a---- 40.00g 0 4.00m 10241 0
188.00k 0 1 1
nQHcrF-KWhE-s8pY-90bc-jPSN-3qZR-pxHe0O iso-domain
-wi-ao--- 10.00g 97.80g 4.00m 34596 25036
1020.00k 0 3 2
qElr6v-lPNE-Kvc5-0g9W-I41J-dsBD-7QfZLv root
-wi-ao--- 19.53g 97.80g 4.00m 34596 25036
1020.00k 0 3 2
FSaRPB-WiZo-Ddqo-hPsB-jUe9-bf4v-eJBTJW swap
-wi-ao--- 7.81g 97.80g 4.00m 34596 25036
1020.00k 0 3 2
host2:
[root@host2 log]# lvs -o
uuid,name,attr,size,vg_free,vg_extent_size,vg_extent_count,vg_free_count,=
tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count
LV UUID LV
Attr LSize VFree Ext #Ext Free LV Tags
VMdaSize
VMdaFree #LV #PV
jGEpVm-oPW8-XyxI-l2yi-YF4X-qteQ-dm8SqL
3d362bf2-20f4-438d-9ba9-486bd2e8cedf -wi-a---- 2.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d42e7b760036,MD_5,PU_f4231952-76c5-4764-9c8b-a=
c73492ac465
128.00m 0 13 2
ltJOs7-T7yE-faQd-MkD8-PS5F-wGXU-nmDQrC
3e147e83-0b0c-4cb8-b46f-67c8dc62756e -wi-ao--- 7.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
IU_bdf2c305-194c-45b5-bd62-1bf01b05e286,MD_7,PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-0=
00000000000
128.00m 0 13 2
YxR9Df-YfvQ-0W5s-5CnC-JGN6-gQug-vi5R4n
57668a89-c5ca-4231-b18a-dd0607e459a5 -wi-a---- 10.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,MD_10,IU_90f2b1e5-59f7-4bed-97a9-=
f02d683f07f8
128.00m 0 13 2
FeqoWr-aYs1-N4M6-Miss-lMec-afKk-7XJKpf
637bdaf7-61cb-4feb-838d-24355367dcec -wi-ao--- 7.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,IU_e2dafaea-71f5-4f60-abc1-0c7bf2=
feb223,MD_9
128.00m 0 13 2
9xWhSv-g5ps-utzj-eXfz-G8Zz-BdkN-hN8wGE
65a711a2-d08a-496a-93de-e47aec19cfb1 -wi-ao--- 12.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
IU_91d741e3-19b7-40bd-8b96-de48caa161f1,PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000=
000000,MD_8
128.00m 0 13 2
Isn11q-cokl-op59-vQcl-l4Rc-Uaeg-1lcGqd
f4231952-76c5-4764-9c8b-ac73492ac465 -wi-a---- 3.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
MD_4,PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d=
42e7b760036
128.00m 0 13 2
u80jcl-PPVX-nRp6-KDqH-ZcRI-IAuU-JMrqK0
f8f7d099-3e54-45c0-8f4b-3ee25901522e -wi-a---- 40.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
MD_6,PU_00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000,IU_d5a37063-66bb-4bf1-9269-e=
ae7f136d7e1
128.00m 0 13 2
h9SB9I-J9Dm-mTIL-lT6T-ZxvF-8mHj-eAs59A ids
-wi-ao--- 128.00m 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
rrycOM-WkBu-1VLg-RYrd-z7bO-8nS9-CkLpqc inbox
-wi-a---- 128.00m 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
IDjyMT-Quxu-NxG8-dKfz-CSlc-i1EQ-o8rlSb leases
-wi-a---- 2.00g 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
sTxbVK-5YDT-H7nw-53b9-Av7J-YIzP-res2b1 master
-wi-a---- 1.00g 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
2lwYGv-cZop-7Jj9-vYFI-RDEZ-1hKy-oXNbei metadata
-wi-a---- 512.00m 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
NznWRR-kLhp-HEMw-0c7P-9XIj-YiXb-oYFovC outbox
-wi-a---- 128.00m 114.62g 128.00m 1596 917
128.00m 0 13 2
G2zjlF-QO3X-tznc-BZE8-mY63-8I9n-gZQ7k5 root
-wi-ao--- 19.53g 4.00m 4.00m 7001 1
1020.00k 0 2 1
vtuPP3-itfy-DtFX-j2gJ-wZBI-3RpF-fsWBJc swap
-wi-ao--- 7.81g 4.00m 4.00m 7001 1
1020.00k 0 2 1
=20
I suggest that you open a bug and attach there engine.log, /var/log/me=
ssages,
vdsm.log and sanlock.log.
=20
Please also give detailed info on the host os, vdsm version etc.
=20
Nir
=20
I'll gather logs and will create bug report.
Thanks!
Boyan
--LREaOVJqkWp8iv9aCReT65xDKv7JE33We
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMUNG4ACgkQXOXFG4fgV76cLQCfRgVxYUJGwyREbC+tBawsveje
z5YAn1oMSGckv6tDa7zxL4rK+oEp31/5
=t4kg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LREaOVJqkWp8iv9aCReT65xDKv7JE33We--
10:39 p.m.
Hi Zdenek, can you look into this strange incident?
When user creates a disk on one host (create a new lv), the lv is not seen
on another host in the cluster.
Calling multipath -r cause the new lv to appear on the other host.
Finally, lvs tell us that vg_mda_free is zero - maybe unrelated, but unusual.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:51:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on some nodes
>>>>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>>>>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start on
host2,
>>>>>> because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is
started on
>>>>>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from host2 log is
in the
>>>>>> end. The LV in question is
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is only
call to
>>>>>> lvs
>>>>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM doesn't fully
refresh.
>
> lvs should see any change on the shared storage.
>
>>>>>> The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM on host2,
which
>>>>>> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
>
> When vdsm starts, it calls multipath -r, which ensure that we see all
> physical volumes.
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs in the
SD VG?
>>>>>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
>>>>>
>>>>> When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new lv should
be
>>>>> visible on the other host. Lets start by verifying that you do see
>>>>> the new lv after a disk was created.
>>>>>
>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the engine ui
>>>>> 2. On another machine, run this command:
>>>>>
>>>>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>>>>>
>>>>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which should contain the
new
>>>>> disk
>>>>> uuid.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you don't see the new lv from the other host, please provide
>>>>> /var/log/messages
>>>>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
>>>>
>>>> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM node.
>>>
>>> This means that storage is not accessible from this host.
>>
>> Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example, if I restart
>> the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up correctly (become visible in lvs
>> output and VMs can be started with them).
>
> Lests repeat this test, but now, if you do not see the new lv, please
> run:
>
> multipath -r
>
> And report the results.
>
Running multipath -r helped and the disk was properly picked up by the
second host.
Is running multipath -r safe while host is not in maintenance mode?
It should be safe, vdsm uses in some cases.
If yes, as a temporary workaround I can patch vdsmd to run multipath
-r
when e.g. monitoring the storage domain.
I suggested running multipath as debugging aid; normally this is not needed.
You should see lv on the shared storage without running multipath.
Zdenek, can you explain this?
>> One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes is
this:
>>
>> Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
>> 16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo) VG
>> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size exceeded
>> critical size: mdasize=134217728 mdafree=0
>
> Can you share the output of the command bellow?
>
> lvs -o
>
uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name
Here's the output for both hosts.
host1:
[root@host1 ~]# lvs -o
uuid,name,attr,size,vg_free,vg_extent_size,vg_extent_count,vg_free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count
LV UUID LV
Attr LSize VFree Ext #Ext Free LV Tags
VMdaSize VMdaFree #LV #PV
jGEpVm-oPW8-XyxI-l2yi-YF4X-qteQ-dm8SqL
3d362bf2-20f4-438d-9ba9-486bd2e8cedf -wi-ao--- 2.00g 114.62g 128.00m
1596 917
IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d42e7b760036,MD_5,PU_f4231952-76c5-4764-9c8b-ac73492ac465
128.00m 0 13 2
This looks wrong - your vg_mda_free is zero - as vdsm complains.
Zdenek, how can we debug this further?
Nir
3:46 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
To: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org, "Zdenek Kabelac" <zkabelac(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:39:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on some nodes
Hi Zdenek, can you look into this strange incident?
When user creates a disk on one host (create a new lv), the lv is not seen
on another host in the cluster.
Calling multipath -r cause the new lv to appear on the other host.
Finally, lvs tell us that vg_mda_free is zero - maybe unrelated, but unusual.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:51:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on some
> nodes
> >>>>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
> >>>>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start on
host2,
> >>>>>> because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is
started on
> >>>>>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from host2 log
is in
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> end. The LV in question is
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is
only call to
> >>>>>> lvs
> >>>>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM doesn't
fully
> >>>>>> refresh.
> >
> > lvs should see any change on the shared storage.
> >
> >>>>>> The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM on
host2, which
> >>>>>> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
> >
> > When vdsm starts, it calls multipath -r, which ensure that we see all
> > physical volumes.
> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs in
the SD
> >>>>>> VG?
> >>>>>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new lv
should be
> >>>>> visible on the other host. Lets start by verifying that you do
see
> >>>>> the new lv after a disk was created.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Try this:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the engine ui
> >>>>> 2. On another machine, run this command:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which should contain
the new
> >>>>> disk
> >>>>> uuid.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you don't see the new lv from the other host, please
provide
> >>>>> /var/log/messages
> >>>>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM node.
> >>>
> >>> This means that storage is not accessible from this host.
> >>
> >> Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example, if I restart
> >> the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up correctly (become visible in lvs
> >> output and VMs can be started with them).
> >
> > Lests repeat this test, but now, if you do not see the new lv, please
> > run:
> >
> > multipath -r
> >
> > And report the results.
> >
>
> Running multipath -r helped and the disk was properly picked up by the
> second host.
>
> Is running multipath -r safe while host is not in maintenance mode?
It should be safe, vdsm uses in some cases.
> If yes, as a temporary workaround I can patch vdsmd to run multipath -r
> when e.g. monitoring the storage domain.
I suggested running multipath as debugging aid; normally this is not needed.
You should see lv on the shared storage without running multipath.
Zdenek, can you explain this?
> >> One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes is this:
> >>
> >> Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
> >> 16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo) VG
> >> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size exceeded
> >> critical size: mdasize=134217728 mdafree=0
> >
> > Can you share the output of the command bellow?
> >
> > lvs -o
> >
uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name
>
> Here's the output for both hosts.
>
> host1:
> [root@host1 ~]# lvs -o
>
uuid,name,attr,size,vg_free,vg_extent_size,vg_extent_count,vg_free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count
> LV UUID LV
> Attr LSize VFree Ext #Ext Free LV Tags
>
> VMdaSize VMdaFree #LV #PV
> jGEpVm-oPW8-XyxI-l2yi-YF4X-qteQ-dm8SqL
> 3d362bf2-20f4-438d-9ba9-486bd2e8cedf -wi-ao--- 2.00g 114.62g 128.00m
> 1596 917
>
IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d42e7b760036,MD_5,PU_f4231952-76c5-4764-9c8b-ac73492ac465
> 128.00m 0 13 2
This looks wrong - your vg_mda_free is zero - as vdsm complains.
Zdenek, how can we debug this further?
I see same issue in Fedora 19.
Can you share with us the output of:
cat /etc/redhat-release
uname -a
lvm version
Nir
4:53 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--jRwgP1nGWsjExEUgLS6FSLvHqevHtQK23
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue Mar 4 14:46:33 2014, Nir Soffer wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org, "Zdenek Kabelac" <zkabelac(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:39:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on=
some nodes
>
> Hi Zdenek, can you look into this strange incident?
>
> When user creates a disk on one host (create a new lv), the lv is not =
seen
> on another host in the cluster.
>
> Calling multipath -r cause the new lv to appear on the other host.
>
> Finally, lvs tell us that vg_mda_free is zero - maybe unrelated, but u=
nusual.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:51:05 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated o=
n some
>> nodes
>>>>>>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>>>>>>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to start
on host=
2,
>>>>>>>> because host2 can't see the LV.
Similarly, if the VM is started=
on
>>>>>>>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2.
Extract from host2 log is =
in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> end. The LV in question is
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280=
=2E
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there is
only ca=
ll to
>>>>>>>> lvs
>>>>>>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM
doesn't fully
>>>>>>>> refresh.
>>>
>>> lvs should see any change on the shared storage.
>>>
>>>>>>>> The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM on
host2, w=
hich
>>>>>>>> makes it refresh all LVM data
properly.
>>>
>>> When vdsm starts, it calls multipath -r, which ensure that we see al=
l
>>> physical volumes.
>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created LVs
in the =
SD
>>>>>>>> VG?
>>>>>>>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new lv
shoul=
d be
>>>>>>> visible on the other host. Lets start by
verifying that you do s=
ee
>>>>>>> the new lv after a disk was created.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the engine
ui
>>>>>>> 2. On another machine, run this command:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which should contain
the=
new
>>>>>>> disk
>>>>>>> uuid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you don't see the new lv from the other host, please
provide
>>>>>>> /var/log/messages
>>>>>>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM node.
>>>>>
>>>>> This means that storage is not accessible from this host.
>>>>
>>>> Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example, if I resta=
rt
>>>> the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up correctly
(become visible in l=
vs
>>>> output and VMs can be started with them).
>>>
>>> Lests repeat this test, but now, if you do not see the new lv, pleas=
e
>>> run:
>>>
>>> multipath -r
>>>
>>> And report the results.
>>>
>>
>> Running multipath -r helped and the disk was properly picked up by th=
e
>> second host.
>>
>> Is running multipath -r safe while host is not in maintenance mode?
>
> It should be safe, vdsm uses in some cases.
>
>> If yes, as a temporary workaround I can patch vdsmd to run multipath =
-r
>> when e.g. monitoring the storage domain.
>
> I suggested running multipath as debugging aid; normally this is not n=
eeded.
>
> You should see lv on the shared storage without running multipath.
>
> Zdenek, can you explain this?
>
>>>> One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes is this:
>>>>
>>>> Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
>>>> 16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo) VG
>>>> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size exceeded
>>>> critical size: mdasize=3D134217728 mdafree=3D0
>>>
>>> Can you share the output of the command bellow?
>>>
>>> lvs -o
>>> uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tag=
s,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name
>>
>> Here's the output for both hosts.
>>
>> host1:
>> [root@host1 ~]# lvs -o
>> uuid,name,attr,size,vg_free,vg_extent_size,vg_extent_count,vg_free_co=
unt,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count
>> LV UUID LV
>> Attr LSize VFree Ext #Ext Free LV Tags
>>
>> VMdaSize VMdaFree #LV #PV
>> jGEpVm-oPW8-XyxI-l2yi-YF4X-qteQ-dm8SqL
>> 3d362bf2-20f4-438d-9ba9-486bd2e8cedf -wi-ao--- 2.00g 114.62g 128.00=
m
>> 1596 917
>> IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d42e7b760036,MD_5,PU_f4231952-76c5-4764-9c=
8b-ac73492ac465
>> 128.00m 0 13 2
>
> This looks wrong - your vg_mda_free is zero - as vdsm complains.
>
> Zdenek, how can we debug this further?
I see same issue in Fedora 19.
Can you share with us the output of:
cat /etc/redhat-release
uname -a
lvm version
Nir
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 19 (Schr=C3=B6dinger=E2=80=99s Cat)
$ uname -a
Linux blizzard.mgmt.futurice.com 3.12.6-200.fc19.x86_64.debug #1 SMP=20
Mon Dec 23 16:24:32 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ lvm version
LVM version: 2.02.98(2) (2012-10-15)
Library version: 1.02.77 (2012-10-15)
Driver version: 4.26.0
--jRwgP1nGWsjExEUgLS6FSLvHqevHtQK23
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMV2tUACgkQXOXFG4fgV75tWgCcDmmo/rkdRNmPuXgfGrMN4VIJ
7z8An0LrJa0bhyS9tLVaqz6U30rM6A+p
=41Ax
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--jRwgP1nGWsjExEUgLS6FSLvHqevHtQK23--
3:37 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 3:53:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on some nodes
On Tue Mar 4 14:46:33 2014, Nir Soffer wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org, "Zdenek Kabelac" <zkabelac(a)redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:39:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on
>> some nodes
>>
>> Hi Zdenek, can you look into this strange incident?
>>
>> When user creates a disk on one host (create a new lv), the lv is not seen
>> on another host in the cluster.
>>
>> Calling multipath -r cause the new lv to appear on the other host.
>>
>> Finally, lvs tell us that vg_mda_free is zero - maybe unrelated, but
>> unusual.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:51:05 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on
>>> some
>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>>>>>>>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to
start on host2,
>>>>>>>>> because host2 can't see the LV. Similarly, if
the VM is started on
>>>>>>>>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract from
host2 log is in
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> end. The LV in question is
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code, there
is only call
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> lvs
>>>>>>>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM
doesn't fully
>>>>>>>>> refresh.
>>>>
>>>> lvs should see any change on the shared storage.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only workaround so far has been to restart VDSM
on host2, which
>>>>>>>>> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
>>>>
>>>> When vdsm starts, it calls multipath -r, which ensure that we see all
>>>> physical volumes.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly created
LVs in the SD
>>>>>>>>> VG?
>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the new
lv should be
>>>>>>>> visible on the other host. Lets start by verifying that
you do see
>>>>>>>> the new lv after a disk was created.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the
engine ui
>>>>>>>> 2. On another machine, run this command:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which should
contain the new
>>>>>>>> disk
>>>>>>>> uuid.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you don't see the new lv from the other host,
please provide
>>>>>>>> /var/log/messages
>>>>>>>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM
node.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This means that storage is not accessible from this host.
>>>>>
>>>>> Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example, if I
restart
>>>>> the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up correctly (become visible in
lvs
>>>>> output and VMs can be started with them).
>>>>
>>>> Lests repeat this test, but now, if you do not see the new lv, please
>>>> run:
>>>>
>>>> multipath -r
>>>>
>>>> And report the results.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Running multipath -r helped and the disk was properly picked up by the
>>> second host.
>>>
>>> Is running multipath -r safe while host is not in maintenance mode?
>>
>> It should be safe, vdsm uses in some cases.
>>
>>> If yes, as a temporary workaround I can patch vdsmd to run multipath -r
>>> when e.g. monitoring the storage domain.
>>
>> I suggested running multipath as debugging aid; normally this is not
>> needed.
>>
>> You should see lv on the shared storage without running multipath.
>>
>> Zdenek, can you explain this?
>>
>>>>> One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes is this:
>>>>>
>>>>> Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
>>>>> 16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo) VG
>>>>> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size exceeded
>>>>> critical size: mdasize=134217728 mdafree=0
>>>>
>>>> Can you share the output of the command bellow?
>>>>
>>>> lvs -o
>>>>
uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name
>>>
>>> Here's the output for both hosts.
>>>
>>> host1:
>>> [root@host1 ~]# lvs -o
>>>
uuid,name,attr,size,vg_free,vg_extent_size,vg_extent_count,vg_free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count
>>> LV UUID LV
>>> Attr LSize VFree Ext #Ext Free LV Tags
>>>
>>> VMdaSize VMdaFree #LV #PV
>>> jGEpVm-oPW8-XyxI-l2yi-YF4X-qteQ-dm8SqL
>>> 3d362bf2-20f4-438d-9ba9-486bd2e8cedf -wi-ao--- 2.00g 114.62g 128.00m
>>> 1596 917
>>>
IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d42e7b760036,MD_5,PU_f4231952-76c5-4764-9c8b-ac73492ac465
>>> 128.00m 0 13 2
>>
>> This looks wrong - your vg_mda_free is zero - as vdsm complains.
Patch http://gerrit.ovirt.org/25408 should solve this issue.
It may also solve the other issue with the missing lv - I could
not reproduce it yet.
Can you try to apply this patch and report the results?
Thanks,
Nir
4:38 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--CFI93AnmktNI0BWuXdh0ffiLXcOJQifXa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Nir,
On Wed Mar 5 14:37:17 2014, Nir Soffer wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 3:53:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on=
some nodes
>
> On Tue Mar 4 14:46:33 2014, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org, "Zdenek Kabelac" <zkabelac(a)redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:39:47 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated =
on
>>> some nodes
>>>
>>> Hi Zdenek, can you look into this strange incident?
>>>
>>> When user creates a disk on one host (create a new lv), the lv is no=
t
seen
>>> on another host in the cluster.
>>>
>>> Calling multipath -r cause the new lv to appear on the other host.
>>>
>>> Finally, lvs tell us that vg_mda_free is zero - maybe unrelated, but=
>>> unusual.
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>>> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:51:05 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated=
on
>>>> some
>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>>>>>>>>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM fails to
start on ho=
st2,
>>>>>>>>>> because host2 can't see
the LV. Similarly, if the VM is start=
ed on
>>>>>>>>>> host1, it fails to migrate to
host2. Extract from host2 log i=
s in
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> end. The LV in question is
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe32=
80.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm code,
there is only =
call
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> lvs
>>>>>>>>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2 LVM
doesn't fully
>>>>>>>>>> refresh.
>>>>>
>>>>> lvs should see any change on the shared storage.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The only workaround so far has been to restart
VDSM on host2,=
which
>>>>>>>>>> makes it refresh all LVM data
properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> When vdsm starts, it calls multipath -r, which ensure that we see =
all
>>>>> physical volumes.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly
created LVs in th=
e SD
>>>>>>>>>> VG?
>>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When you create a new lv on the shared storage, the
new lv sho=
uld be
>>>>>>>>> visible on the other host. Lets
start by verifying that you do=
see
>>>>>>>>> the new lv after a disk was
created.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in the
engine ui=
>>>>>>>>> 2. On another machine, run this
command:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which should
contain t=
he new
>>>>>>>>> disk
>>>>>>>>> uuid.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you don't see the new lv from the other host,
please provid=
e
>>>>>>>>> /var/log/messages
>>>>>>>>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the non-SPM
node.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This means that storage is not accessible from this host.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example, if I
res=
tart
>>>>>> the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up
correctly (become visible in=
lvs
>>>>>> output and VMs can be started with them).
>>>>>
>>>>> Lests repeat this test, but now, if you do not see the new lv, ple=
ase
>>>>> run:
>>>>>
>>>>> multipath -r
>>>>>
>>>>> And report the results.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Running multipath -r helped and the disk was properly picked up by =
the
>>>> second host.
>>>>
>>>> Is running multipath -r safe while host is not in maintenance mode?=
>>>
>>> It should be safe, vdsm uses in some cases.
>>>
>>>> If yes, as a temporary workaround I can patch vdsmd to run multipat=
h -r
>>>> when e.g. monitoring the storage domain.
>>>
>>> I suggested running multipath as debugging aid; normally this is not=
>>> needed.
>>>
>>> You should see lv on the shared storage without running multipath.
>>>
>>> Zdenek, can you explain this?
>>>
>>>>>> One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes is
this=
:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
>>>>>> 16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo) VG
>>>>>> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size
exceeded
>>>>>> critical size: mdasize=3D134217728 mdafree=3D0
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you share the output of the command bellow?
>>>>>
>>>>> lvs -o
>>>>> uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,t=
ags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name
>>>>
>>>> Here's the output for both hosts.
>>>>
>>>> host1:
>>>> [root@host1 ~]# lvs -o
>>>> uuid,name,attr,size,vg_free,vg_extent_size,vg_extent_count,vg_free_=
count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count
>>>> LV UUID LV
>>>> Attr LSize VFree Ext #Ext Free LV Tags
>>>>
>>>> VMdaSize VMdaFree #LV #PV
>>>> jGEpVm-oPW8-XyxI-l2yi-YF4X-qteQ-dm8SqL
>>>> 3d362bf2-20f4-438d-9ba9-486bd2e8cedf -wi-ao--- 2.00g 114.62g 128.=
00m
>>>> 1596 917
>>>> IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d42e7b760036,MD_5,PU_f4231952-76c5-4764-=
9c8b-ac73492ac465
>>>> 128.00m 0 13 2
>>>
>>> This looks wrong - your vg_mda_free is zero - as vdsm complains.
Patch http://gerrit.ovirt.org/25408 should solve this issue.
It may also solve the other issue with the missing lv - I could
not reproduce it yet.
Can you try to apply this patch and report the results?
Thanks,
Nir
This patch helped, indeed! I tried it on the non-SPM node (as that's=20
the node that I can currently easily put in maintenance) and the node=20
started picking up newly created volumes correctly. I also set the=20
user_lvmetad to 0 in the main lvm.conf, because without it manually=20
running e.g. lvs was still using the metadata daemon.
I can't confirm yet that this helps with the metadata volume warning,=20
as that warning appears only on the SPM. I'll be able to put the SPM=20
node in maintenance soon and will report later.
This issue on Fedora makes me think - is Fedora still fully supported=20
platform?
Best regards,
Boyan
--CFI93AnmktNI0BWuXdh0ffiLXcOJQifXa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMXKNcACgkQXOXFG4fgV76CZgCgkAj0IDS6sTZr3DyAVmvBO9J+
vEcAnjP/qvyIjx9eR1DkdP6Ccj2VK/4n
=/pXc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--CFI93AnmktNI0BWuXdh0ffiLXcOJQifXa--
5:01 p.m.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 3:38:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on some nodes
Hello Nir,
On Wed Mar 5 14:37:17 2014, Nir Soffer wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 3:53:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on
>> some nodes
>>
>> On Tue Mar 4 14:46:33 2014, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org, "Zdenek Kabelac"
<zkabelac(a)redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:39:47 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated
on
>>>> some nodes
>>>>
>>>> Hi Zdenek, can you look into this strange incident?
>>>>
>>>> When user creates a disk on one host (create a new lv), the lv is not
>>>> seen
>>>> on another host in the cluster.
>>>>
>>>> Calling multipath -r cause the new lv to appear on the other host.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, lvs tell us that vg_mda_free is zero - maybe unrelated, but
>>>> unusual.
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>>>> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
>>>>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:51:05 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not
visible/activated on
>>>>> some
>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>>>>>>>>>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM
fails to start on host2,
>>>>>>>>>>> because host2 can't see the LV.
Similarly, if the VM is started
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2. Extract
from host2 log is in
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> end. The LV in question is
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe3280.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm
code, there is only call
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> lvs
>>>>>>>>>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the host2
LVM doesn't fully
>>>>>>>>>>> refresh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lvs should see any change on the shared storage.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The only workaround so far has been to
restart VDSM on host2,
>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When vdsm starts, it calls multipath -r, which ensure that we
see all
>>>>>> physical volumes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any newly
created LVs in the SD
>>>>>>>>>>> VG?
>>>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions where the problem might be?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When you create a new lv on the shared storage,
the new lv should
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> visible on the other host. Lets start by
verifying that you do see
>>>>>>>>>> the new lv after a disk was created.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid in
the engine ui
>>>>>>>>>> 2. On another machine, run this command:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which
should contain the
>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>> disk
>>>>>>>>>> uuid.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you don't see the new lv from the other
host, please provide
>>>>>>>>>> /var/log/messages
>>>>>>>>>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the
non-SPM node.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This means that storage is not accessible from this
host.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example, if
I restart
>>>>>>> the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up correctly (become
visible in lvs
>>>>>>> output and VMs can be started with them).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lests repeat this test, but now, if you do not see the new lv,
please
>>>>>> run:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> multipath -r
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And report the results.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Running multipath -r helped and the disk was properly picked up by
the
>>>>> second host.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is running multipath -r safe while host is not in maintenance mode?
>>>>
>>>> It should be safe, vdsm uses in some cases.
>>>>
>>>>> If yes, as a temporary workaround I can patch vdsmd to run multipath
-r
>>>>> when e.g. monitoring the storage domain.
>>>>
>>>> I suggested running multipath as debugging aid; normally this is not
>>>> needed.
>>>>
>>>> You should see lv on the shared storage without running multipath.
>>>>
>>>> Zdenek, can you explain this?
>>>>
>>>>>>> One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes is
this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
>>>>>>> 16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo) VG
>>>>>>> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size
exceeded
>>>>>>> critical size: mdasize=134217728 mdafree=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you share the output of the command bellow?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lvs -o
>>>>>>
uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the output for both hosts.
>>>>>
>>>>> host1:
>>>>> [root@host1 ~]# lvs -o
>>>>>
uuid,name,attr,size,vg_free,vg_extent_size,vg_extent_count,vg_free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count
>>>>> LV UUID LV
>>>>> Attr LSize VFree Ext #Ext Free LV Tags
>>>>>
>>>>> VMdaSize VMdaFree #LV #PV
>>>>> jGEpVm-oPW8-XyxI-l2yi-YF4X-qteQ-dm8SqL
>>>>> 3d362bf2-20f4-438d-9ba9-486bd2e8cedf -wi-ao--- 2.00g 114.62g
128.00m
>>>>> 1596 917
>>>>>
IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d42e7b760036,MD_5,PU_f4231952-76c5-4764-9c8b-ac73492ac465
>>>>> 128.00m 0 13 2
>>>>
>>>> This looks wrong - your vg_mda_free is zero - as vdsm complains.
>
> Patch http://gerrit.ovirt.org/25408 should solve this issue.
>
> It may also solve the other issue with the missing lv - I could
> not reproduce it yet.
>
> Can you try to apply this patch and report the results?
>
> Thanks,
> Nir
This patch helped, indeed! I tried it on the non-SPM node (as that's
the node that I can currently easily put in maintenance) and the node
started picking up newly created volumes correctly. I also set the
user_lvmetad to 0 in the main lvm.conf, because without it manually
running e.g. lvs was still using the metadata daemon.
I can't confirm yet that this helps with the metadata volume warning,
as that warning appears only on the SPM. I'll be able to put the SPM
node in maintenance soon and will report later.
This issue on Fedora makes me think - is Fedora still fully supported
platform?
It is supported, but probably not tested properly.
Nir
5:44 p.m.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--oXn0SGFNv1kLlogwarm5QsNoD8UwRwMnq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 5.3.2014, 16:01, Nir Soffer wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 3:38:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated on=
some nodes
>
> Hello Nir,
>
> On Wed Mar 5 14:37:17 2014, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 3:53:24 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not visible/activated =
on
>>> some nodes
>>>
>>> On Tue Mar 4 14:46:33 2014, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> To: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>>>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org, "Zdenek Kabelac"
<zkabelac(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:39:47 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not
visible/activate=
d on
>>>>> some nodes
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Zdenek, can you look into this strange incident?
>>>>>
>>>>> When user creates a disk on one host (create a new lv), the lv is =
not
>>>>> seen
>>>>> on another host in the cluster.
>>>>>
>>>>> Calling multipath -r cause the new lv to appear on the other host.=
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, lvs tell us that vg_mda_free is zero - maybe unrelated, b=
ut
>>>>> unusual.
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "Boyan Tabakov" <blade(a)alslayer.net>
>>>>>> To: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 9:51:05 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Users] SD Disk's Logical Volume not
visible/activat=
ed on
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>>>>>> Consequently, when creating/booting
>>>>>>>>>>>> a VM with the said disk attached, the VM
fails to start on =
host2,
>>>>>>>>>>>> because host2
can't see the LV. Similarly, if the VM is sta=
rted
>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> host1, it fails to migrate to host2.
Extract from host2 log=
is in
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> end. The LV in question is
6b35673e-7062-4716-a6c8-d5bf72fe=
3280.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> As far as I could track quickly the vdsm
code, there is onl=
y call
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> lvs
>>>>>>>>>>>> and not to lvscan or lvchange so the
host2 LVM doesn't full=
y
>>>>>>>>>>>> refresh.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lvs should see any change on the shared storage.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The only workaround so far has been to
restart VDSM on host=
2,
>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>> makes it refresh all LVM data properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When vdsm starts, it calls multipath -r, which ensure that we
se=
e all
>>>>>>> physical volumes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When is host2 supposed to pick up any
newly created LVs in =
the SD
>>>>>>>>>>>> VG?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions where the problem might
be?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When you create a new lv on the shared
storage, the new lv s=
hould
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> visible on the other host. Lets start by
verifying that you =
do see
>>>>>>>>>>> the new lv after a disk
was created.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Try this:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Create a new disk, and check the disk uuid
in the engine =
ui
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. On another machine,
run this command:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> lvs -o vg_name,lv_name,tags
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You can identify the new lv using tags, which
should contain=
the
>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>> disk
>>>>>>>>>>> uuid.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't see the new lv from the
other host, please prov=
ide
>>>>>>>>>>> /var/log/messages
>>>>>>>>>>> and /var/log/sanlock.log.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just tried that. The disk is not visible on the
non-SPM node.=
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This means that storage is not accessible from this
host.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Generally, the storage seems accessible ok. For example,
if I r=
estart
>>>>>>>> the vdsmd, all volumes get picked up
correctly (become visible =
in lvs
>>>>>>>> output and VMs can be started with
them).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lests repeat this test, but now, if you do not see the new
lv, p=
lease
>>>>>>> run:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> multipath -r
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And report the results.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Running multipath -r helped and the disk was properly picked up
b=
y the
>>>>>> second host.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is running multipath -r safe while host is not in maintenance
mod=
e?
>>>>>
>>>>> It should be safe, vdsm uses in some cases.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If yes, as a temporary workaround I can patch vdsmd to run
multip=
ath -r
>>>>>> when e.g. monitoring the storage domain.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggested running multipath as debugging aid; normally this is n=
ot
>>>>> needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> You should see lv on the shared storage without running multipath.=
>>>>>
>>>>> Zdenek, can you explain this?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One warning that I keep seeing in vdsm logs on both nodes
is th=
is:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thread-1617881::WARNING::2014-02-24
>>>>>>>> 16:57:50,627::sp::1553::Storage.StoragePool::(getInfo)
VG
>>>>>>>> 3307f6fa-dd58-43db-ab23-b1fb299006c7's metadata size
exceeded
>>>>>>>> critical size: mdasize=3D134217728 mdafree=3D0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you share the output of the command bellow?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lvs -o
>>>>>>>
uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count=
,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's the output for both hosts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> host1:
>>>>>> [root@host1 ~]# lvs -o
>>>>>>
uuid,name,attr,size,vg_free,vg_extent_size,vg_extent_count,vg_fre=
e_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count
>>>>>> LV UUID LV
>>>>>> Attr LSize VFree Ext #Ext Free LV Tags
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VMdaSize VMdaFree #LV #PV
>>>>>> jGEpVm-oPW8-XyxI-l2yi-YF4X-qteQ-dm8SqL
>>>>>> 3d362bf2-20f4-438d-9ba9-486bd2e8cedf -wi-ao--- 2.00g 114.62g
12=
8.00m
>>>>>> 1596 917
>>>>>>
IU_0227da98-34b2-4b0c-b083-d42e7b760036,MD_5,PU_f4231952-76c5-476=
4-9c8b-ac73492ac465
>>>>>> 128.00m 0 13 2
>>>>>
>>>>> This looks wrong - your vg_mda_free is zero - as vdsm complains.
>>
>> Patch http://gerrit.ovirt.org/25408 should solve this issue.
>>
>> It may also solve the other issue with the missing lv - I could
>> not reproduce it yet.
>>
>> Can you try to apply this patch and report the results?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nir
>
> This patch helped, indeed! I tried it on the non-SPM node (as that's
> the node that I can currently easily put in maintenance) and the node
> started picking up newly created volumes correctly. I also set the
> user_lvmetad to 0 in the main lvm.conf, because without it manually
> running e.g. lvs was still using the metadata daemon.
>
> I can't confirm yet that this helps with the metadata volume warning,
> as that warning appears only on the SPM. I'll be able to put the SPM
> node in maintenance soon and will report later.
>
> This issue on Fedora makes me think - is Fedora still fully supported
> platform?
=20
It is supported, but probably not tested properly.
=20
Nir
=20
Alright! Thanks a lot for the help!
BR,
Boyan
--oXn0SGFNv1kLlogwarm5QsNoD8UwRwMnq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMXOGkACgkQXOXFG4fgV76fggCfdCw3VrqvDCB565NVByNEQ+MG
Aw8AoJu5O1l9PtdOH08mr7YE5RTgg26C
=D5gj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--oXn0SGFNv1kLlogwarm5QsNoD8UwRwMnq--
3915
days inactive
3930
days old
13 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Boyan Tabakov -
Nir Soffer