12:04 p.m.
Hello, I recently conducted a test to compare the CPU performance of a
physical machine, a high performance VM (pass-through CPU, PIN CPU), and a
common VM.
Here are the results:
1. Physical machine:
# sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=100000000 --threads=2 run
WARNING: the --test option is deprecated. You can pass a script name or path
on the command line without any options.
sysbench 1.0.17 (using system LuaJIT 2.0.4)
Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 2
Initializing random number generator from current time
Prime numbers limit: 100000000
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
CPU speed:
events per second: 0.01
General statistics:
total time: 346.0588s
total number of events: 2
Latency (ms):
min: 345943.52
avg: 346001.09
max: 346058.65
95th percentile: 100000.00
sum: 692002.17
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 1.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 346.0011/0.06
2. High Performance VM:
# sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=100000000 --threads=2 run
WARNING: the --test option is deprecated. You can pass a script name or path
on the command line without any options.
sysbench 1.0.17 (using system LuaJIT 2.0.4)
Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 2
Initializing random number generator from current time
Prime numbers limit: 100000000
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
CPU speed:
events per second: 0.01
General statistics:
total time: 351.8625s
total number of events: 2
Latency (ms):
min: 351416.59
avg: 351639.01
max: 351861.43
95th percentile: 100000.00
sum: 703278.02
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 1.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 351.6390/0.22
3. Common VM:
# sysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=100000000 --threads=2 run
WARNING: the --test option is deprecated. You can pass a script name or path
on the command line without any options.
sysbench 1.0.17 (using system LuaJIT 2.0.4)
Running the test with following options:
Number of threads: 2
Initializing random number generator from current time
Prime numbers limit: 100000000
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
CPU speed:
events per second: 0.01
General statistics:
total time: 354.9108s
total number of events: 2
Latency (ms):
min: 354761.26
avg: 354835.99
max: 354910.73
95th percentile: 100000.00
sum: 709671.99
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 1.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 354.8360/0.07
Result:
There is little difference in CPU performance between these three scenarios,
so why distinguish between high performance and regular virtual machines? I
don't think it makes much sense.
1:12 p.m.
Have you done CPU passthrough in a high-performance virtual machine? What are the NUMA
settings?
As far as I know, CPU passthrough is only available in the high performance virtual
machine and certain CPU flags are also applied
6:11 p.m.
New subject: CPU performance test results in three scenarios
CPU passthrough and cpu pinning are important for cpu lattency workloads luke for example
SAP HANA or workloads that benefit from the extra (cpu passthrough) instructions.
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 13:13, Patrick Lomakin<patrick.lomakin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Have you done CPU passthrough in a high-performance virtual machine? What are the NUMA
settings?
As far as I know, CPU passthrough is only available in the high performance virtual
machine and certain CPU flags are also applied
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/AUDKY7CRTQU...
11:30 a.m.
On my OLVM environment, I assigned a high-performance virtual machine with CPU passthrough
and CPU Pin Settings, but why did I find NUMA unavailable when configuring it?
The physical host cpu info:
[root@kvms3 ~]# lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 8
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7
Thread(s) per core: 2
Core(s) per socket: 4
Socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 142
Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz
Stepping: 10
CPU MHz: 3934.702
CPU max MHz: 4200.0000
CPU min MHz: 400.0000
BogoMIPS: 4199.88
Virtualization: VT-x
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 256K
L3 cache: 8192K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm
constant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid
aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr
pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand
lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb invpcid_single pti ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp
tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2
erms invpcid rtm mpx rdseed adx smap clflushopt intel_pt xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves
dtherm ida arat pln pts hwp hwp_notify hwp_act_window hwp_epp md_clear flush_l1d
The vm cpu info:
[root@testhigh ~]# lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 2
On-line CPU(s) list: 0,1
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 1
Socket(s): 2
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 142
Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz
Stepping: 10
CPU MHz: 2111.998
BogoMIPS: 4223.99
Virtualization: VT-x
Hypervisor vendor: KVM
Virtualization type: full
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 4096K
L3 cache: 16384K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0,1
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon
rep_good nopl xtopology cpuid tsc_known_freq pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1
sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm
abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault invpcid_single pti ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp tpr_shadow vnmi
flexpriority ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm
mpx rdseed adx smap clflushopt xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves arat umip md_clear
arch_capabilities
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)ovirt.org <users-bounces(a)ovirt.org> On Behalf Of Patrick
Lomakin
Sent: Monday, August 2, 2021 6:13 PM
To: users(a)ovirt.org
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: CPU performance test results in three scenarios
Have you done CPU passthrough in a high-performance virtual machine? What are the NUMA
settings?
As far as I know, CPU passthrough is only available in the high performance virtual
machine and certain CPU flags are also applied
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org Privacy Statement:
https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/AUDKY7CRTQU...
1207
days inactive
1208
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Patrick Lomakin -
Strahil Nikolov -
Tommy Sway