10:25 a.m.
When you add a fc17 node and look at it, it seems to add:
* ovirtmgmt bridge
* p2p1 interface
* and bond0-bond3.
Where does the bonding information get stored? It doesn't seem to be in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts?
The reason I ask, is I have two nodes one of which has the bonding
interfaces up and the other which doesn't. The one that doesn't have the
bonding interfaces up is failing to be added to the ovirt node list.
Thanks,
-cdm
1:10 a.m.
New subject: [Users] where do bond interfaces come from when adding a node that is FC17
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090103020307080201000300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 09/19/2012 11:25 PM, Christopher Maestas wrote:
When you add a fc17 node and look at it, it seems to add:
* ovirtmgmt bridge
* p2p1 interface
* and bond0-bond3.
Where does the bonding information get stored? It doesn't seem to be
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts?
The bonding devices are created dynamically when vdsmd starts.
The reason I ask, is I have two nodes one of which has the bonding
interfaces up and the other which doesn't. The one that doesn't have
the bonding interfaces up is failing to be added to the ovirt node list.
I am not sure how the failure of adding host is related to bonding
interfaces. You could check the log
/tmp/vds_bootstrap.xxxxxx.log and /tmp/vds_installer.xxxxxx.log during
node installation.
Thanks,
-cdm
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--------------090103020307080201000300
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 09/19/2012 11:25 PM, Christopher Maestas wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABq_tT2r8+g2sfmCCBryjm==e+LGFHwmnW2R=GZLjzu8meNLqg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>
<div>When you add a fc17 node and look at it, it seems to add:</div>
<div>* ovirtmgmt bridge </div>
<div>* p2p1 interface </div>
<div>* and bond0-bond3. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Where does the bonding information get stored? It doesn't
seem to be in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts?</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
The bonding devices are created dynamically when vdsmd starts.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABq_tT2r8+g2sfmCCBryjm==e+LGFHwmnW2R=GZLjzu8meNLqg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>The reason I ask, is I have two nodes one of which has the
bonding interfaces up and the other which doesn't. The one that
doesn't have the bonding interfaces up is failing to be added to
the ovirt node list.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
I am not sure how the failure of adding host is related to bonding
interfaces. You could check the log<br>
/tmp/vds_bootstrap.xxxxxx.log and /tmp/vds_installer.xxxxxx.log
during node installation.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABq_tT2r8+g2sfmCCBryjm==e+LGFHwmnW2R=GZLjzu8meNLqg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Thanks,<br clear="all">
<div>-cdm</div>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users">http://...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------090103020307080201000300--
5:50 a.m.
New subject: [Users] where do bond interfaces come from when adding a node that is FC17
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Wu" <wudxw(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Christopher Maestas" <cdmaestas(a)gmail.com>
Cc: users(a)ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Users] where do bond interfaces come from when adding a node that is FC17
On 09/19/2012 11:25 PM, Christopher Maestas wrote:
When you add a fc17 node and look at it, it seems to add:
* ovirtmgmt bridge
* p2p1 interface
* and bond0-bond3.
Where does the bonding information get stored? It doesn't seem to be
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts?
The bonding devices are created dynamically when vdsmd starts.
Correct, vdsm creates 'empty' bond0-4 by default for future use
The reason I ask, is I have two nodes one of which has the bonding
interfaces up and the other which doesn't. The one that doesn't have
the bonding interfaces up is failing to be added to the ovirt node
list.
Sorry, but I am not really understand what is a configuration on your hosts.
Could you please send output of ifconfig from both hosts and output of
'vdsClient 0 getVdsCaps' ?
I am not sure how the failure of adding host is related to bonding
interfaces. You could check the log
/tmp/vds_bootstrap.xxxxxx.log and /tmp/vds_installer.xxxxxx.log
during node installation.
Thanks,
-cdm
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
6:18 a.m.
New subject: [Users] where do bond interfaces come from when adding a node that is FC17
On 09/20/2012 08:10 AM, Mark Wu wrote:
On 09/19/2012 11:25 PM, Christopher Maestas wrote:
> When you add a fc17 node and look at it, it seems to add:
> * ovirtmgmt bridge
> * p2p1 interface
> * and bond0-bond3.
>
> Where does the bonding information get stored? It doesn't seem to be in
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts?
>
The bonding devices are created dynamically when vdsmd starts.
> The reason I ask, is I have two nodes one of which has the bonding
> interfaces up and the other which doesn't. The one that doesn't have the
> bonding interfaces up is failing to be added to the ovirt node list.
>
I am not sure how the failure of adding host is related to bonding
interfaces. You could check the log
/tmp/vds_bootstrap.xxxxxx.log and /tmp/vds_installer.xxxxxx.log during node
installation.
Why doesn't vdsm write its log files to /var/log/vdsm where people would
expect them to be? I think writing this to /tmp is a really bad habit that
should be fixed sooner rather than later especially given the importance of
the logs when something goes wrong.
Regards,
Dennis
4483
days inactive
4484
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Christopher Maestas -
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn -
Igor Lvovsky -
Mark Wu