Il 04/12/2014 09:19, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
On 04/12/14 02:24, Robert Story wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:37:19 +0100 Sandro wrote: SB> Two different proposals have been made about above scheduling [3]: SB> 1) extend the cycle to 10 months for allowing to include a large SB> feature set 2) reduce the cycle to less than 6 months and split SB> features over 3.6 and 3.7
I'd prefer a six-month cycle, so that the smaller features and enhancements come more quickly.
If I read Sandro correct your choice is not in the given alternatives? Would this be an third option? to neither decrease nor increase the release cycle?
Keeping current is what we'll have if we won't have agreements :-) Let's wait a couple of weeks for gathering the full feature list and have a better picture of how much time it will take to get them in.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com