On 3/27/20 11:01 AM, Christian Reiss wrote:
Hey Strahil,
as always: thanks!
On 24/03/2020 12:23, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
performance.write-behind-window-size: 64MB (shard size)
This one doubled my speed from 200mb to 400mb!!
I think this is where the meat is at.
-Chris.
Won't this increase the risk of data loss? We have everything on dual power feeds etc, so the risk of the having all or 2/3's of the gluster nodes fail at the same time is very minimal. But still when that happens? And with a shard size of 512MB this would be performance.write-behind-window-size: 512MB? Always tweaking ;-) Met vriendelijke groet, With kind regards, Jorick Astrego Netbulae Virtualization Experts ---------------- Tel: 053 20 30 270 info@netbulae.eu Staalsteden 4-3A KvK 08198180 Fax: 053 20 30 271 www.netbulae.eu 7547 TA Enschede BTW NL821234584B01 ----------------