Re: [Users] Fence-virt support
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Eli Mesika <emesika(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> - fence-virtd uses a keyfile, no username and password.
This is a real problem , we are not supporting currently other authentication methods
Yes, It's probably going to take a bit of a hack to make this
work with the current mechanism/gui because the key file
has to be an actual _file_.
I just made a local config + keyfile for my testnodes.
> - fence-virtd uses port=vmname to identify a VM
>
> The gui has mandatory username and password fields and
> the standard port/sshport field only takes numeric values.
For that we have the options field , you could omit the port from the fence mapping and
then add in the options "port=<value>"
Yes that's what I did. One of the problems with that is that
port= maps to the sshport field in the apc part of the gui
which brings us back to BZ 1014513.
> Some of the problems I ran into are probably related to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020344
This is actually related to another BZ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014513
Yes, that's actually the one I meant but I couldn't find it.