----- Original Message -----
From: "Maurice James" <mjames@media-node.com> To: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck@redhat.com> Cc: "users" <users@ovirt.org>, "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik@redhat.com>, "Martin Sivak" <msivak@redhat.com> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 9:21:35 PM Subject: Spam Re: [ovirt-users] Spam Affinity
Done
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112369
----- Original Message ----- From: "Doron Fediuck" <dfediuck@redhat.com> To: "Maurice James" <mjames@media-node.com> Cc: "users" <users@ovirt.org>, "Gilad Chaplik" <gchaplik@redhat.com>, "Martin Sivak" <msivak@redhat.com> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 4:45:21 AM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Spam Affinity
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maurice James" <mjames@media-node.com> To: "users" <users@ovirt.org> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2014 4:41:27 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] Spam Affinity
If I set negative affinity on two VM that are currently on the same server, how long until one of them migrates to a different host? Is the time configurable somewhere? I think that as soon as I configure the negative affinity between the two VMs, they should begin to migrate
Hi Maurice, affinity is being handled during the scheduling process and not afterwards. So already placed VMs will not move unless they will be picked up by the load balancing process which obeys affinity rules.
The reason for it is to avoid adding noise on loaded setups. However we should be able to make sure load balancing will handle affinity as well and only then balance the cluster.
Do mind opening an RFE for it?
Thanks, Doron
Thanks Maurice.