Re: [ovirt-users] Help with Power Management network

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --6hbjLnkovF48sGRtH3EeifVsBNInERaiS Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="eX6Fj6GO04UPSRQAk8fnFKke5WIU9RqDP"; protected-headers="v1" From: ~Stack~ <i.am.stack(a)gmail.com&gt; To: Dan Yasny <dyasny(a)gmail.com&gt; Cc: users <users(a)ovirt.org&gt; Message-ID: <17b0343e-77d0-9346-125b-93f0b825720f(a)gmail.com&gt; Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Help with Power Management network References: <42d5325d-217f-5559-ec5a-11a10fbad2ed(a)gmail.com&gt; <CALLXwb75NdSTasW9DAqP7hZf1famjjoRkTHb6t5AOTnYhHa4iA(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; In-Reply-To: <CALLXwb75NdSTasW9DAqP7hZf1famjjoRkTHb6t5AOTnYhHa4iA(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; --eX6Fj6GO04UPSRQAk8fnFKke5WIU9RqDP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/29/2017 05:31 PM, Dan Yasny wrote: Seriously?? I didn't see anything like that in the docs...Maybe I just missed it. Also, why wouldn't it still validate? It should still be able to talk to the interface over the BMC/IPMI network. The fact that I can run the equivalent test on the command line makes it seem like it should at least be able to check via the test. Obviously, it would be silly for it to try to manage itself, but it could at least verify that the configuration is valid, right? I have more hosts that I'm going to add, I was just hoping to do those via the Foreman integration instead of manually building them. Since I'm not quite ready for that, I will just build a second host on Monday and report back. Thanks for the feedback. I would have never guess that as a possibility. = :-) ~Stack~ --eX6Fj6GO04UPSRQAk8fnFKke5WIU9RqDP-- --6hbjLnkovF48sGRtH3EeifVsBNInERaiS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" --6hbjLnkovF48sGRtH3EeifVsBNInERaiS--