Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] oVirt 3.6 Planning

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com <mailto:iheim@redhat.com>> wrote: On 09/13/2014 03:38 PM, Mohyedeen Nazzal wrote: One more thing,, Being able to attach USB dongles from the admin portal...

like the hostusb vdsm hook allows? Yes, exactly. Thanks, Mohyedeen. On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Mohyedeen Nazzal <mohyedeen.nazzal(a)gmail.com <mailto:mohyedeen.nazzal@gmail.com> <mailto:mohyedeen.nazzal@__gmail.com <mailto:mohyedeen.nazzal@gmail.com>>> wrote: When VMs goes to unknown status, all control options are grayed, and the only way to fix this is to update the Database manually, it will be nice to be able to force the engine to poweroff the VM from admin portal. Thanks, Mohyedeen. On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com> <mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com <mailto:nsoffer@redhat.com>>> wrote: ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sven Kieske" <s.kieske(a)mittwald.de <mailto:s.kieske@mittwald.de> <mailto:s.kieske@mittwald.de <mailto:s.kieske@mittwald.de>>> > To:users@ovirt.org <mailto:To%3Ausers@ovirt.org> <mailto:users@ovirt.org <mailto:users@ovirt.org>> > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 4:53:46 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [RFI] oVirt 3.6 Planning > > +1! > > I really would like to see a fast working way to create, manage > and use ceph in ovirt. I don't know if implementation through > openstack component is enough, because you will need more components > then (keystone for auth e.g.). Sure you will need more components, but we don't want to duplicate the effort, implementing ceph support directly in ovirt. Using Cinder we can reuse the existing ceph support, and gain also support for other Cinder drivers for free. On the host side, we will have of course ceph specific support, so you will be able to create ceph volumes directly, and use vdsm api to start vms using these volumes, if you want more "direct" support. I think this is the general long term approach; integrate openstack components instead of re-implementing the wheel. > > On 12/09/14 15:34, Cédric Buot de l'Epine wrote: > > Dunno if CephFS efforts will be sustainable against Glusterfs... > > I'm not sure if a posix fs is the best provider for blocks. > > I would be pleased to have a direct form to create a Ceph pool for a > > datacenter, then provide librbd path for the guests (or only their size). > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards > > Sven Kieske > > Systemadministrator > Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG > Königsberger Straße 6 > 32339 Espelkamp > T: +49-5772-293-100 <tel:%2B49-5772-293-100> <tel:%2B49-5772-293-100> > F: +49-5772-293-333 <tel:%2B49-5772-293-333> <tel:%2B49-5772-293-333> > https://www.mittwald.de > Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer > St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen > Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen > _________________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> <mailto:Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>> > http://lists.ovirt.org/__mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> > _________________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> <mailto:Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>> http://lists.ovirt.org/__mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users> _________________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> http://lists.ovirt.org/__mailman/listinfo/users <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>