Oh Sorry Dan, you are one of them ;) Nice to have you on this :) 2015-03-09 23:49 GMT+01:00 Matt . <yamakasi.014@gmail.com>:
Hi,
I also see this on the latest 3.5 version, I'm thinking about setting up a cronjob to restart vdsm every night.
I cannot believe that people say they don't have this issue.
Can someone of the devs dive in maybe ?
Thanks!
Matt
2015-03-09 23:29 GMT+01:00 Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com>:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:40:51AM -0500, Darrell Budic wrote:
On Mar 9, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 10:58:53AM -0600, Darrell Budic wrote:
I believe the supervdsm leak was fixed, but 3.5.1 versions of vdsmd still leaks slowly, ~300k/hr, yes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158108
On Mar 6, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Chris Adams <cma@cmadams.net> wrote:
Once upon a time, Federico Alberto Sayd <fsayd@uncu.edu.ar> said: > I am experiencing troubles with VDSM memory consuption. > > I am running > > Engine: ovirt 3.5.1 > > Nodes: > > Centos 6.6 > VDSM 4.16.10-8 > Libvirt: libvirt-0.10.2-46 > Kernel: 2.6.32 > > When the host boots, memory consuption is normal, but after 2 or 3 > days running, VDSM memory consuption grows and it consumes more > memory that all vm's running in the host. If I restart the vdsm > service, memory consuption normalizes, but then it start growing > again. > > I have seen some BZ about vdsm and supervdsm about memory leaks, but > I don't know if VDSM 4.6.10.8 is still affected by a related bug.
Can't help, but I see the same thing with CentOS 7 nodes and the same version of vdsm. -- Chris Adams <cma@cmadams.net> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I'm afraid that we are yet to find a solution for this issue, which is completly different from the horrible leak of supervdsm < 4.16.7.
Could you corroborate the claim of Bug 1147148 - M2Crypto usage in vdsm leaks memory ? Does the leak disappear once you start using plaintext transport?
Regards, Dan.
I don’t think this is crypto related, but I could try that if you still need some confirmation (and point me at a quick doc on switching to plaintext?).
This is from #ovirt around November 18th I think, Saggi thought he’d found something related:
9:58:43 AM saggi: YamakasY: Found the leak 9:58:48 AM saggi: YamakasY: Or at least the flow 9:58:57 AM saggi: YamakasY: The good news is that I can reproduce 9:59:20 AM YamakasY: saggi: that's kewl! 9:59:25 AM YamakasY: saggi: what happens ? 9:59:41 AM YamakasY: I know from Telsin (ping ping!) that he sees it going faster on gluster usage tdosek left the room (quit: Ping timeout: 480 seconds). (10:00:02 AM) djasa left the room (quit: Quit: Leaving). (10:00:24 AM) mlipchuk left the room (quit: Quit: Leaving.). (10:00:29 AM) laravot left the room (quit: Quit: Leaving.). (10:01:19 AM) 10:01:54 AM saggi: YamakasY: it's in getCapabilities(). Here is the RSS graph. The flatlines are when I stopped calling it and called other verbs. http://i.imgur.com/CLm0Q75.png
I do recall what is the issue Saggi and YamakasY were dicussing (CCing the pair), or if it reached fruition as a patch. It is certainly something other than Bug 1158108, as the latter speak about a leak in a normal working state, with no getCapabilities calls.