Re: [Users] so, what do you want next in oVirt?

On 11/06/2013 06:41 PM, Jakub Bittner wrote: > Dne 7.10.2013 13:58, Juan Pablo Lorier napsal(a): >> Thanks for the info. >> Regards, >> >> On 06/10/13 17:26, Itamar Heim wrote: >>> On 08/29/2013 05:22 PM, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I think that one of the best things from Proxmox is the ability to >>>> connect to any of the hosts via web and been able to admin the hole >>>> infrastructure from there. This avoids the single point of failure >>>> that >>>> today engine represents in ovirt plataform. >>> hosted engine should resolve this one. >>> >>>> I agree with Jakub that been able to mix Intel and AMD hosts would be >>>> great so we can use the hole of the servers into a DC and engine may >>>> migrate VM to the same kind of processors if available but if not, >>> as i replied just now, afaik, live migration between intel/amd isn't >>> supported by kvm. >>> >>>> migrate to any available host and alert about the performance >>>> degradation. >>> you can't really migrate to a "lesser" host, only to at least same cpu >>> level. >>> >>>> I'm still a rookie to ovirt so at this time I don't know all the >>>> features to make further coments. I think you have a great product >>>> and >>>> the best of it is the speed it's improving. >>> thanks, glad to hear. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Hello, > > sorry for reopening old topic, but I have 1 (or 2) feature request to > ovirt 3.4. It would be great to have possibility to edit network > description and comment while it is attached to running VM. Second please open an BZ RFE, maybe add to the 3.4 planning doc? > feature request is fault tolerant VM. I did not find any info about this > in ovirt discussion. Basically it means running same VM on two(or more) > separated host where one is standard VM and the second one is exact copy > (network, ram contents, disk, everything). When host where standard VM > runs fails, then the mirrored VM should became standard one and continue > operation without any user notice. Like HA, but without restart. I think we're still waiting on this to be more robust in qemu-kvm first > > Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users