12:11 p.m.
Marcin,
Also I noticed in your original post it mentions:
ip link - the result should include a link called genev_sys_ ...
I noticed that on my hosts I don't see any links with name: genev_sys_ ??
Could this be a problem?
lo:
enp4s0f0:
enp4s0f1:
enp7s0f0:
enp7s0f1:
bond0:
DEV-NOC:
ovirtmgmt:
bond0.700@bond0:
DEV-VM-NET:
bond0.705@bond0:
;vdsmdummy;:
vnet0:
vnet1:
vnet2:
vnet3:
vnet4:
ovs-system:
br-int:
vnet5:
vnet6:
However, the br-int appears to have been configured:
[root@las01-902-001 ~]# ovs-vsctl show
4c817c66-9842-471d-b53a-963e27e3364f
Bridge br-int
fail_mode: secure
Port "vnet6"
Interface "vnet6"
Port "vnet5"
Interface "vnet5"
Port "ovn-456949-0"
Interface "ovn-456949-0"
type: geneve
options: {csum="true", key=flow,
remote_ip="172.10.10.74"}
Port "ovn-252778-0"
Interface "ovn-252778-0"
type: geneve
options: {csum="true", key=flow,
remote_ip="172.10.10.75"}
Port br-int
Interface br-int
type: internal
ovs_version: "2.6.90"
However there is no traffic showing:
[root@las01-902-001 ~]# ifconfig br-int
br-int: flags=4098<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ether 2e:c4:a6:fa:0c:40 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Devin Acosta <devin(a)pabstatencio.com> wrote:
Marcin,
For OVN to work properly does the port that the traffic flows over need to
be a bridge, or OVS port? Right now it's just going over the ovirtmgmt
network which is just a standard port. I know like in Neutron you have to
configure (br-ex) and then it would need to be using the OVS protocol, and
then all the nodes would need to be an OVS port. I presume OVN tries to
simplify this setup?
I also seen that there is (openvswitch-ovn-vtep), would this need to be
configured in any way?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Marcin Mirecki <mmirecki(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Devin,
>
> Please not the OVN-controller is not the central part where OVN northd is
> running.
> OVN-controllers are the OVN processes deployed on the hosts.
> The correct usage of the 'vdsm-tool ovn-config'.
> - the IP of the OVN-central (not to be confused with OVN-controllers,
> which is the part of OVN running on the hosts)
> - the local host IP to be used for tunneling to other OVN hosts
> for example, if the OVN-central IP should be 10.10.10.1, and the IP of
> the local host used for tunneling: 10.10.10.101:
> vdsm-tool ovn-config 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.101
>
> Looking at the output of 'ovs-vsctl' the tunnels have been created.
>
> The OVN log saying 'dropping duplicate flow' is worrying, let me forward
> this to
> the OVN team to take a look at it.
>
> Marcin
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Devin Acosta" <devin(a)pabstatencio.com>
> > To: "users" <Users(a)ovirt.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2016 12:24:21 AM
> > Subject: [ovirt-users] oVIRT 4 / OVN / Communication issues of
> instances between nodes.
> >
> >
> > Note: When I configured vdsm-tool ovn-config, I passed it the IP
> address of
> > the OVN-Controller which is using the ovirtmgmt network, which is just
> one
> > of the NIC's on the nodes.
> >
> > I am opening up new thread as this I feel differs a bit from my original
> > request. I have OVN which I believe is deployed correctly. I have
> noticed
> > that if instances get spun up on the same oVIRT node they can all talk
> > without issues to one another, however if one instance gets spun up on
> > another node even if it has the same (OVN network/subnet), it can't
> ping or
> > reach other instances in the subnet. I noticed that the OVN-Controller
> of
> > the instance that can't talk is logging:
> >
> > 2016-12-02T22:50:54.907Z|00181|pinctrl|INFO|DHCPOFFER 00:1a:4a:16:01:5c
> > 10.10.10.4
> > 2016-12-02T22:50:54.908Z|00182|pinctrl|INFO|DHCPACK 00:1a:4a:16:01:5c
> > 10.10.10.4
> > 2016-12-02T22:50:55.695Z|00183|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 7 log messages in
> last 10
> > seconds (most recently, 0 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:50:55.695Z|00184|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:10.705Z|00185|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 6 log messages in
> last 15
> > seconds (most recently, 5 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:10.705Z|00186|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:20.710Z|00187|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 4 log messages in
> last 10
> > seconds (most recently, 5 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:20.710Z|00188|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:35.718Z|00189|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 5 log messages in
> last 15
> > seconds (most recently, 5 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:35.718Z|00190|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:45.724Z|00191|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 3 log messages in
> last 10
> > seconds (most recently, 5 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:45.724Z|00192|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:55.730Z|00193|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 5 log messages in
> last 10
> > seconds (most recently, 0 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:51:55.730Z|00194|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> > 2016-12-02T22:52:10.738Z|00195|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 5 log messages in
> last 15
> > seconds (most recently, 5 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:52:10.739Z|00196|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> > 2016-12-02T22:52:20.744Z|00197|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 3 log messages in
> last 10
> > seconds (most recently, 5 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:52:20.744Z|00198|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> > 2016-12-02T22:52:35.752Z|00199|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 5 log messages in
> last 15
> > seconds (most recently, 5 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:52:35.752Z|00200|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> > 2016-12-02T22:52:45.758Z|00201|ofctrl|INFO|Dropped 4 log messages in
> last 10
> > seconds (most recently, 5 seconds ago) due to excessive rate
> > 2016-12-02T22:52:45.758Z|00202|ofctrl|INFO|dropping duplicate flow:
> > table_id=32, priority=150, reg10=0x2/0x2, actions=resubmit(,33)
> >
> > From the OVN-Controller:
> >
> > [root@dev001-022-002 ~]# ovn-nbctl show
> > switch ddb3b92f-b359-4b59-a41a-ebae6df7fe9a (devins-net)
> > port 6b289418-8b8e-42b4-8334-c71584afcd3e
> > addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:5c dynamic"]
> > port 71ef81f1-7c20-4c68-b536-d274703f7541
> > addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:61 dynamic"]
> > port 91d4f4f5-4b9f-42c0-aa2c-8a101474bb84
> > addresses: ["00:1a:4a:16:01:5e dynamic"]
> >
> > Do I need to do something special in order to allow communication
> between
> > nodes of instances on same OVN network?
> >
> > Output of ovs-vsctl show from node3:
> >
> > 61af799c-a621-445e-8183-23dcb38ea3cc
> > Bridge br-int
> > fail_mode: secure
> > Port "ovn-456949-0"
> > Interface "ovn-456949-0"
> > type: geneve
> > options: {csum="true", key=flow, remote_ip="172.10.10.74"}
> > Port "ovn-c0dc09-0"
> > Interface "ovn-c0dc09-0"
> > type: geneve
> > options: {csum="true", key=flow, remote_ip="172.10.10.73"}
> > Port br-int
> > Interface br-int
> > type: internal
> > ovs_version: "2.6.90"
> >
> > --
> >
> > Devin Acosta
> > Red Hat Certified Architect, LinuxStack
> > 602-354-1220 || devin(a)linuxguru.co
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)ovirt.org
> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
--
Devin Acosta
Red Hat Certified Architect, LinuxStack
602-354-1220 || devin(a)linuxguru.co
--
Devin Acosta
Red Hat Certified Architect, LinuxStack
602-354-1220 || devin(a)linuxguru.co