Re: [ovirt-users] Is oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 recommended for production usage?
I prefer deploying as a hyperconverged setup, but it is still under experiment,
right?
So I try to separate vm service and storage. I added new storage domain(
Domain Type "Data", Storage Type "GlusterFS", Use Host
"host-01". But then I
can't add another new storage domain( Domain Type "Data", Storage Type
"GlusterFS", Use Host "host-02"). The input field "path" is
unwritable
(gray) on the Popup New Domain Window.
My question is, should we add a new storage domain for each ovirt-node?
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Sahina Bose <sabose(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Make sure that you use replica 3 gluster volumes for storing VM
images.
Are you planning to deploy as a hyperconverged setup?
Either way, try and use the latest ovirt 3.6 and glusterfs 3.7 (3.7.12
that addresses bugs related to sharding and o-direct is due to be released
soon)
On 06/21/2016 07:08 AM, Dewey Du wrote:
I want to deploy oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 to my online servers. Is it
recommended for production usage?
Thx.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing listUsers@ovirt.orghttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.5 KB)