On 04/02/2014 10:19 AM, Sven Kieske wrote:
Hi,
thanks for bringing this up, based on the fact that el7 is based on
fedora 19 I assume it should work, as ovirt runs on fedora 19 too.
I hope the redhat dev team keeps that in mind when changing stuff
in el7.
As you point out, the qemu-kvm version is one of the most interesting
things, especially the compiler flags (live migration anyone?).
1. we currently provide the qemu-kvm-rhev package via an ovirt jenkins
build, while we work with CentOS virt/cloud SIGs to try and resolve
this within CentOS.
2. Yes, we are looking at .el7 support. I'm hoping/assuming a community
edition will be available around 3.5 GA to consider it.
3. I think Fabian replied in the past they moved ovirt-node to be .el6
based, rather than fedora based to reduce the churn.
Am 02.04.2014 08:31, schrieb Paul Jansen:
> Hi.
> There's been a bit of chatter about what is required for Fedora 20 support for
ovirt.
> I can't seem to find newer fedora19 based node isos anymore. Has there been a
conscious decision to standardize on the el6 based node iso?
> Is an F20 based node iso something that is being worked on?
>
> I hear that el7 might be announced this month. Presumably Centos 7.0 won't be
far away after that.
> I've done some test installs of RHEL 7 beta to get a look at what packages are in
use.
> Of particular interest to me is the qemu-kvm package - the version of which seem to
be important for live snapshots and live migrations (something we don't seem to do
well right now).
> EL beta7 has this version - qemu-kvm-1.5.3-19.el7.x86_64.rpm
>
> Given the issues with needing newer versions of certain packages than what is in EL
6.5, is this situation likely to be improved greatly when Centos 7 is available?
> I don't recall seeing much discussion about ovirt running under el7. Is this
being looked at at this stage, or given the fact there is only a beta of rhel7 to work
with right now are we just waiting for the release before deciding too much?