[+gluster-users] On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi, a few weeks ago I opened a survey asking oVirt users about how they use oVirt. Here are the analytics of the survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1s3k4pq_U4vHTuUUKr6dOosGj_ EGFxqEisansHlqnyyM/viewanalytics#responses
Most notable facts: - 197 responses, two times the responses we got with the 3.6 survey! - CentOS confims as the most used distribution for running oVirt engine (89.8%) and Hypervisors (74.3% which become 94.2% including oVirt Node which is a CentOS spin) - Fedora is the second distribution (4.6%) mostly used only for runnig oVirt engine - oVirt Node jumped from 7.1% on 3.6 survey to 19.9% in 4.1! - Surprisingly we have someone running both engine and hypervisor on Ubuntu based system, within VMs. I'd like to hear more about this use case. - Within other OS we had Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7 and Scientific Linux (I guess 7, wasn't specified) - Within the storage, there isn't a "winner" between NFS, Gluster and iSCSI. Within Other Storage, Fiber Channel is the most used. We had also: Ceph, DAS, EMC ScaleIO, GPFS - Hosted Engine is the most used deployment choice with 58.4% (was 50.0% in 3.6) - 65.8% of Hosted Engine users use it in Hyperconverged setup.
Thank you for your feedback and appreciation, we'll look into suggestions you sent in the survey.
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>