Re: [ovirt-users] separate ovirtmgmt from glusterfs traffic

On 18/11/14 06:25, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote: > Hi, > > In my experience, having ovirt traffic on the same nic that gluster > can make your platafrom unstable. I was using it for large file > storage and gluster has so big traffic that ovirt got confused and > started marking hosts as unavailable because of hi latency. > I've opened an RFE over a year ago, but had no luck with the team to > get it done. In the RFE I was asking to have a way in the UI to decide > which nic to use for gluster other than the MGMT net that is the one > ovirt lets you use. > There's another way to do this and it's from outside ovirt. There you > have to unregister and re register the bricks using gluster console > commands. This way, when you register the bricks, you can specify the > IP address of the spare NIC and then the traffic will not interfere > with the mgmt. > There's a step that I don't recall much, but ovirt is going to need to > know that the bricks are no longer is the mgmt IP, maybe someone else > in the list can help with this. I can tell you that if you search the > list you'll see my posts about this and the replys of those who helped > my back then. > Regards, > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > I think that the possibility to add a separate storage network is a must. It doesn't make sense Gluster support if you can't separate management network traffic of storage network traffic. In 3.5 you can define management/vm/display/migration interfaces but not storage interfaces. Why? I don't know. But I think that Gluster support is incomplete without exclusive storage networking. Regards Federico _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users