Re: [Users] HA and SPM host
On 06/13/2013 08:14 PM, Marc Seward wrote:
Would it be correct to say that VMs running on NFS/local storage
will
not be affected if there is no SPM host.In other words,these VMs can
still be started on a non SPM host (host 2) after host1 got fenced(SPM
host before it got fenced).
yes, except for operations like live snapshot or storage live migration
On Wednesday, June 12, 2013, Marc Seward wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Marc Seward* <linuxuser26(a)gmail.com <javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'linuxuser26(a)gmail.com');>>
Date: Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] HA and SPM host
To: Jiri Belka <jbelka(a)redhat.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'jbelka(a)redhat.com');>>
Thank you very much for your response.
I have noticed delays in the selection of the SPM host and attempts
to run VMs even before SPM host is selected.AFAIU,that is incorrect
behavior.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Jiri Belka <jbelka(a)redhat.com
<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'jbelka(a)redhat.com');>> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:16:28 -0400
Marc Seward <linuxuser26(a)gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'linuxuser26(a)gmail.com');>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In a 2 hypervisor setup,if host1 is fenced(host1 is also the
SPM host) and
> it has HA VMs running on it,would these VMs be started on
host2 only after
> host2 is elected as the SPM host?
It would first try to migrate VMs and if this won't work if
would fence
SPM host and start HA VMs on other (now new SPM) host.
j.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users