[ovirt-users] Re: bond or different networks for frontend and backend
Sorry I hear this hashing term the first time.
So in cockpit this would be a team with 802.3ad LACP / Passive? And you
would put all 4 nics in this team?
In the switch I still have to define a link aggregation (on hp switch a
trunk) with LACP?
Am 24.11.20 um 13:36 schrieb Strahil Nikolov:
> If I had 4 x 1GBE , I would consider LACP with hashing on layer 3+4.
>
> For production use, I would go with 10GBE at least.
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
>
>
>
>
>
> В вторник, 24 ноември 2020 г., 10:40:22 Гринуич+2, jb <jonbae77(a)gmail.com>
написа:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> here in the description
>
(https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/gluster-hyperconverged/chap-Single_no...)
> it says that we should have at least 2 interfaces to separate frontend
> and backend traffic.
>
> How is this when I have 4 nics and I make with all one bond interface,
> is this not better in terms of performance? What is your recommendation
> with 4 x 1Gbit nics?
>
> Best regards
>
> Jonathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list -- users(a)ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
> oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/P5ZLQLG2TZN...