
Sorry I hear this hashing term the first time. So in cockpit this would be a team with 802.3ad LACP / Passive? And you would put all 4 nics in this team? In the switch I still have to define a link aggregation (on hp switch a trunk) with LACP? Am 24.11.20 um 13:36 schrieb Strahil Nikolov:
If I had 4 x 1GBE , I would consider LACP with hashing on layer 3+4.
For production use, I would go with 10GBE at least.
Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov
В вторник, 24 ноември 2020 г., 10:40:22 Гринуич+2, jb <jonbae77@gmail.com> написа:
Hello,
here in the description (https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/gluster-hyperconverged/chap-Single_node_...) it says that we should have at least 2 interfaces to separate frontend and backend traffic.
How is this when I have 4 nics and I make with all one bond interface, is this not better in terms of performance? What is your recommendation with 4 x 1Gbit nics?
Best regards
Jonathan
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/P5ZLQLG2TZN56I...