--_000_a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628bDM2PR05MB320namprd05pro_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts. One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At the = time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just a warning= , so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a warning, a lot of pe= ople are probably missing it. When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a "rhs-virt= ualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. I substitute= d the "virtual-host" profile. I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293<http= s://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D987293>, where "rhs-virtualizatio= n" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV + RHS. I am guessing that w= hatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos = into that same path, which is not appropriate. My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses "rhs-virtualizat= ion" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls back to "virtual= -host". (I don't know what (if any) differences there are between the two = profiles.) Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path? Ted Miller --_000_a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628bDM2PR05MB320namprd05pro_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
<style style=3D"display: none;" id=3D"owaParaStyle" type=3D"text/css"><!--P= {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}--></style> </head> <body tabindex=3D"0" aria-label=3D"Message body" fpstyle=3D"1" dir=3D"ltr"> <div name=3D"divtagdefaultwrapper" id=3D"divtagdefaultwrapper" style=3D"fon= t-family: Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #0000= 00; margin: 0"> I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.<br> <br> One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use= . At the time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It i= s now just a warning, so it does not prevent installing a host. But, = as a warning, a lot of people are probably missing it.<br> <br> When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a "rhs= -virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos= . I substituted the "virtual-host" profile.<br> <br> I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla <a href=3D"= https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D987293"> <b>987293</b></a>, where "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for= "virtual-host" for RHEV + RHS. I am guessing that what= ever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos= into that same path, which is not appropriate.<br> <br> My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses "rhs-virtua= lization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls back t= o "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences t= here are between the two profiles.)<br> <br> Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?= <br> <br> Ted Miller<br> <br> </div> </body> </html> --_000_a584ee1c0d4e40a2ae295cf23111628bDM2PR05MB320namprd05pro_--