Re: [Users] Mixing tagged and untagged VLANs

I attempted to set ovirtmgmt to untagged and making it a VM network but that would not save. The configuration: ovirtmgmt: - Display Network - Migration Network - VM Network - NO VLAN ipmi: - VM Network - VLAN 2 When I go into a host's Network Interfaces and attempt to sync the removal of VLAN 1 from ovirtmgmt I get the following message: "Cannot setup Networks. The following Network Interfaces can have only a single VM Logical Network, or at most one non-VM Logical Network and/or several VLAN Logical Networks: eth0." So simply having one untagged and the rest tagged doesn't work. Is that expected? The use case here is simply to minimize cabling and hardware requirements as our current hypervisors have two GbE interfaces and a single IB interface. Our connectivity requirements are to 3 networks, public (direct connected to switches we have no control over for campus) and private (internal LAN) and our dedicated IPMI / Out-of-Band network (internal LAN). To interface VMs with all 3 networks and only 2 uplinks we used a tagged VLAN on our primary private network switch to link up our IPMI network as long as interface is tagged VLAN 2. The private continues to work as-is by remaining untagged. At the moment since the untagged ovirtmgmt + tagged ipmi logical network isn't allowed in oVirt we've had to explicitly set VLAN 1 (private) to tagged for specific ports on our switch. While this isn't a huge issue, to us it's an unnecessary complication of something that "should" work. I'm able to achieve the desired untagged + tagged setup using bridges in Linux when configured by hand, so I know that it technically can be done. Thanks - Trey On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Assaf Muller <amuller(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: