Re: [Users] databases naming way is so confusing
On 03/07/2013 07:30 AM, Shireesh Anjal wrote:
On 03/07/2013 08:23 AM, bigclouds wrote:
> hi, today i look into the databases,i find the way of naming of
> tables is so confusing.
> like vds_group==cluster,storage_pool==datacenter,........
> i think it is better straightforward.
I agree :)
I believe it's more of a 'legacy' issue.
that's even before the legacy :)
I'm sure everyone will be happy for patches fixing table and business
entity names to match what they are called today...
i'd start from vds-->host as an experiment and an obvious change.
for vds_group (cluster), and storage_pool (also [ab]used as data_center)
it's a bit more tricky, as the right change is probably more than just a
naming change, but let's see someone tackling vds/host first :)
>
> now i have not found which table is HOST.
The view VDS should provide most details of a HOST. The underlying
tables are VDS_STATIC, VDS_DYNAMIC and VDS_STATISTICS
Once you get that VDS is HOST, VDS_GROUP suddenly starts making sense :)
>
> i appreciate your hard work,but i hope my suggest is meaningful.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users