On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 2:56 PM, gregor <gregor_forum@catrix.at> wrote:
Hi,
I planned for a new customer to use oVirt instead of competitor virtualization.
Here are the environment:
Server choices: 1. HP ProLiant ML10 v2: 1x Dual Core 3,1GHz with 12GB RAM 2. HP ProLiant ML110 Gen9: 1x Xeon 1,6GHz with 12GB RAM
What you really need to compare first of all are the processors, where more cores is (usually) preferred, then memory speed and lastly, expandability. But of course, it really depends on budget and use case (for example, if IO is critical, I'd spend more on higher performing drives / more drives / caching). There's no clear cut winner here, especially without knowing the price difference and use case. Y.
Harddisk: - Raid1 on two SATA 2TB drives
Guests: - 1x Windows Server Essentials 2012 R2 - 2x CentOS 7
Clients: - 6 Windows Clients
Will the ML10 v2 server serve the needed performance? Because its a way cheaper than the ML110. And will Windows Server 2012 run in oVirt, because on my test machine (HP ProLiant ML350 G5) it didn't (maybe the CPU is to old).
regards gregor _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users