Hi Itamar!
I think another consideration here is with the issues around
upgrades
with fedora (which breaks itself during upgrade), if recommending to
deploy on .el6[1] (RHEL/CentOS/etc.) platforms wouldn't be better.
[1] until other platforms are added - ubuntu is starting to look close.
So that Fedora can be the testingbed that it was designed to be; yes I think so to. But
there have been issues going from CentOS-6.3- to 6.4 with oVirt as well, no? I mean, isn´t
upgrading issues something that needs dealing with sooner rather than later, regardless of
the distribution? Or are "we" hoping for that much better maintainability
between CentOS-6.X and oVirt-3.X that they can live alongside of each other throughout
their respective lifespan?
There weren´t any "official" packages for CentOS when we set up our platform,
otherwise we would have probably chosen CentOS right from start, for that increased
stability. But is there any commitment from your side to continue supporting oVirt on
CentOS, or is it going to continue being more or less a "one-man show"? (No
offense to Dreyou, keep up the good work, awesome job so far)
Best Regards
Karli Sjöberg
,.øfifi÷