--=-KLUllTzJKqDIi9r6a2ps Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Mittwoch, den 11.12.2013, 10:32 +0000 schrieb Simon Barrett:
I would rather stick with the el6 iso if possible for the reasons mention= ed in the previous email. However, if there are no plans to continue with t= he production of el6 ovirt-node iso's I'll switch to fc19. =20 So I suppose the question still stands, are there plans to release an el6= iso for oVirt Node 3.0.3-1-1?
Hey Simon, yes - it is still planned to do el6/CentOS based ovirt-node-iso releases. Contributions and testing is always welcome. - fabian
Hi,
The point of "Node" is that it should be like an appliance. You should= =20 not care what is "under the covers". You just use it as a back-end=20 appliance that talks to oVirt. So it should not matter what version of= =20 OS it runs, right?
If you start doing things that are particular to the OS, two major=20 disadvantages come to mind: 1. You will start "bloating" the system by adding new dependencies.=20 This dilutes the value of a minimal node that minimizes management=20 requirements 2. You will diverge from what's been tested by the oVirt= =20 QA team. This increases the risk of your deployment.
Since Node is supposed to be an appliance, I would prefer that the=20 oVirt team focus their energies on making it as small and robust as=20 possible, rather than putting their energy into multiple OS versions of= Node. =20 not sure i agree. there are differences between the fedora and .el6 distr= o's, especially around things like testing of backward compatibility for li= ve migration between different versions (for a clean upgrade path).
Many thanks. =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Itamar Heim [mailto:iheim@redhat.com]=20 Sent: 09 December 2013 19:47 To: Bob Doolittle; Simon Barrett; users@ovirt.org; Fabian Deutsch Subject: Re: [Users] oVirt Node ISO =20 On 12/09/2013 08:58 PM, Bob Doolittle wrote: the fedora one covers newer features / fast moving the .el6 one is more r= obust / tested. =20 so depends on what you are trying to do. =20
-Bob
On 12/09/2013 06:31 AM, Simon Barrett wrote:
Are there plans to release an el6 iso for oVirt Node 3.0.3-1-1?
I only see the fc19 version currently:
Index of /releases/3.3/iso
[ICO] Name Last modified Size Description
[DIR] Parent Directory -
[ ] ovirt-node-iso-3.0.1-1.0.1.vdsm.el6.iso 28-Aug-2013 04:56 219M
[ ] ovirt-node-iso-3.0.1-1.0.1.vdsm.fc19.iso 28-Aug-2013 04:56 250M
[ ] ovirt-node-iso-3.0.1-1.0.2.vdsm.el6.iso 11-Sep-2013 05:18 219M
[ ] ovirt-node-iso-3.0.1-1.0.2.vdsm.fc19.iso 11-Sep-2013 05:19 250M
[ ] ovirt-node-iso-3.0.3-1.1.vdsm.fc19.iso 27-Nov-2013 07:54 252M
Many Thanks,
Simon
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
=20
--=-KLUllTzJKqDIi9r6a2ps Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJSqEkWAAoJEC9+uOgSHVGUgZIQAJ1Hy6wQuPqk7GBGJty6zo31 OZ2eZQ76s31xmuypCyg/ffh4DX7y1poM1U/md9E9sydKz1zaWA1dJDz9QNS4MPUg 3xrZQhFaop+7jdi1xMTPOzkomen55tPwsbyAH10TY3F4291FKysPtu3DhZgIRDRg 3U2BhBsR0tWZxa12GCESfHrORf+hK17PZ8JBsQ/w5y6aQLWtafD7/7MI8FfDu106 748HFeNRKx1jdKlBGCpXHvsT2C4+Q5OJehJZdArdxBSXFU1l2gcUFpJ4II/fF145 fbk3ELjOFs/v+6gpoWjVkO8KeE58U57G9zebEXYX2uhuFhXV/71BekpDRzdgNucR y5I8q+oMBwZb5PRy52arCfY8an0MXcxx0K4tQluBkiIC6Xpn6HCpOTuukaTIHCBX fH4Cu41HUg7bO34CgR18UO7dGjBHiuqErT9S/0sCLwj1+YI9/oYtNulHAoiW3yIu c1UY20Bo6vh0gKL6LjCWXhq9rmybsHYfXSVjLhxHCTM+LYyn2B0pYFhjF8kUhAeA xmcIJY9o0zpBpPhlzhb5hjA9WXZNeUNQF9zW2PmLID+ZRC+GghXbTob8nUVeWUF/ bDgSpwJY+9gO2R+GZp0Z84rHsP7DLj8C/xcmV2XLKz+LUiwTdg2uNmgZ8k1b8O3+ 0KaPPp+LD/nz5+rdY/rx =6zEq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KLUllTzJKqDIi9r6a2ps--