Hey,
This might sounds like a foolish question, but from the link you
mentioned:
> oVirt 3.1 was released as Fedora 17 package while 3.2 is targeted
> Fedora 18. Due to the nature of this upgrade, we DO NOT recommend it,
> users are advised to do a 3.2 clean installation, and to import all
> VM's and template into the new installation.
Is there anything special I would have to do to import all the VMs
(around 40) from my ovirt 3.1.0-2 to another ovirt (which runs 3.2.2) ?
you should:
-create and attach an export domain to the relevant datacenter on your
3.1 system
-export the vms you need to the export domain
-disconnect the export domain
-import the domain on your 3.2.2 system (from storage tab)
-import the vms to the relevant datacenter
Mvh, Alfred Angelov
On 06/23/2013 11:35 AM, Alex Lourie wrote:
> Hi Karli
>
> I've written up all we know at [1], please try to follow it (if you
> haven't yet) and let us know how it goes. If anything goes wrong, we
> will look for the ways to resolve it.
>
> Alex.
>
> [1]
http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.1_to_3.2_upgrade
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Alex Lourie <alourie(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi Karli
>>
>> I am reviewing all the actions again, and hopefully will have
>> something documented on Sunday.
>>
>> Alex.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Karli Sjöberg
>> <Karli.Sjoberg(a)slu.se> wrote:
>> > tis 2013-06-18 klockan 10:06 +0300 skrev Moran Goldboim: On >
>> 06/17/2013 02:51 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>> >> >> > mån 2013-06-17 klockan 10:11 +0003 skrev Alex Lourie:
On
>> Fri, > Jun 14, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Karli Sjöberg
>> <Karli.Sjoberg(a)slu.se> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>> > Hi!
>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Hi Karli,
>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > More than two months
have passed without any
>> notices or updates >>>> on >>>> > this issue, and
looking at the
>> bugreport absolutely nothing has >>>> been >>>> > done
since then.
>> What´s confusing me is that the release >>>> management
>>>> > for
>> oVirt 3.2 has this clearly printed:
>> >>>> > "MUST: Upgrade from previous release"
>> >>>> > >>>> > And you all seem too busy with
getting the next
>> release out of >>>> the >>>> > door before fixing the
current...
>> What gives? Don´t you care >>>> about >>>> > early
adopters?
>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> I apologise that this
issue wasn't taken care of
>> yet. It is clear >>>> that >>>> the priorities of
developers shifted
>> towards work on features in >>>> 3.3 >>>> release, which
feature
>> freeze is happening in about 2 weeks, so >>>> you can
>>>>
>> understand the time pressure they all have. There's no need to be
>> >>>> angry >>>> about that. It is an open source project
and as
>> resources for the >>>> development are limited, we're trying to
do
>> our best to cover as >>>> much >>>> issues as possible.
This can
>> lead to situations as this issue, >>>> which >>>> may be
left behind
>> for some time.
>> >>>> >>> >>> I´m not angry, as I stated before,
I´m more confused,
>> and maybe a >>> little disappointed that important(in my opinion)
>> pieces of a >>> projects continuum have been ignored like that. I´m
>> having a hard >>> time understanding the reasoning behind the
>> priorities that have >>> made this issue appear. In my mind, making
>> sure that users of any >>> project are able to follow between minor
>> upgrades is a given, with >>> a schedule like; 1) Feature freeze, 2)
>> Fix release blockers >>> (upgrading being one of them), 3) Release,
>> in that order. Now >>> what´s happening is that you are kind of
>> hoping to drag this out >>> until the problem goes away by itself
>> when you decide it´s time to >>> stop supporting 3.1.
>> >>> >>>> That said, the process for upgrading the oVirt 3.1
on
>> Fedora 17 to >>>> oVirt 3.2 on Fedora 18 is complex and non-trivial,
>> that's why it >>>> is >>>> taking time to resolve all
the issues
>> that come up in the process.
>> >>>> >>>> If this matter is not extremely urgent, we are
currently
>> working >>>> on a >>>> tool that may make this upgrade
easier,
>> albeit, maybe, not >>>> completely >>>> automatic.
>> >>>> >>>> On the other hand, if this is a completely and
utterly
>> urgent, we >>>> may >>>> try to guide you through
possible manual
>> attempts to perform the >>>> upgrade. Mind though, that they
weren't
>> thoroughly tested, and not >>>> promised to go smoothly or even
>> work, and we may have to think >>>> about >>>> possible
alternative
>> solutions on the go.
>> >>>> >>> >>> Straight answer: Am I ever going to
be able to upgrade
>> from 3.1 to >>> 3.2?
>> >>> >>> My concern (fear) is about being left behind,
abandoned. It
>> makes >>> me feel non-important. Just like any admin, the work put
>> down to >>> make Templates, to set up quotas, create VMPools, a
>> dozen of >>> guests. And then have to export everything (nullifying
>> the idea of >>> "Thin Provisioning"), redo every Role, reset
every
>> permission, >>> quota, and so on, isn´t (in my opinion) viable in
>> the long run for >>> oVirt as a project to demand. That´s why I had
>> the notion that >>> upgrading surely had to be a high priority. Was
>> I wrong about that?
>> >>> >> >> upgrade actually was high priority task, but due
to lots
>> of platform >> (fedora 18) changes, it became a huge operation to
>> support it (which >> comes on top new features/bugs/support etc.).
>> >> in addition we have noticed that the interest from the community
>> >> regarding it, is very limited.
>> >> >> from where i see i we have couple of options:
>> >> -if there is enough interest from the community we can give it >>
>> another go (though i think most of it moved long ago to oVirt 3.2)
>> >> > > You certainly have my interest at least;)
>> > >> -we can help individuals by making a migration (3.1->3.2)
>> document >> on fedora base systems- we'll probably need your
>> assistance on >> testing side here
>> >> > > A document explaining how to upgrade would be completly
>> acceptable > for me. I´m not asking for a turnkey command that makes
>> everything > for me, I´ve managed to get quite far by myself any
>> way. I would > love to help testing the procedure, as I´ve stated
>> before, we have > set up a dedicated test environment dedicated for
>> this specific > upgrade task in mind, with engine, hosts and storage
>> somewhat equal > to the production system. Please, if there´s
>> anything I can do to > help, don´t hesitate to ask!
>> > >> >> >>> >>>> Best regards,
>> >>>> Alex Lourie,
>> >>>> Software Developer in Integration,
>> >>>> RHEV, Red Hat.
>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > Best Regards
>> >>>> > Karli Sjöberg
>> >>>> > >>>> > fre 2013-04-05 klockan 10:24 +0200
skrev Sandro
>> Bonazzola: Hi >>>> Karli,
>> >>>> >> we're still working on it
>> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Il
02/04/2013 12:22, Karli Sjöberg ha scritto:
>> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > Hi,
>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> has there been any
progress regarding this matter?
>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Best Regards
>> >>>> >>> Karli Sjöberg
>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> fre 2013-03-15
klockan 14:12 +0000 skrev Karli
>> Sjöberg:
>> >>>> >>>> fre 2013-03-15 klockan 14:59 +0100 skrev Sandro
Bonazzola:
>> >>>> >>>>> Il 13/03/2013 12:24, Karli Sjöberg ha
scritto:
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
ons 2013-03-13 klockan 12:00 +0100 skrev Dave
>> Neary: Hi >>>> Karli,
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> On 03/11/2013 12:16 PM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
>> >>>> >>>>>>> > Hi,
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>> >>>>>>> > in the absence of any official
path, we have started
>> >>>> working >>>> >>>>>>> out our
own
>> >>>> >>>>>>> > procedure for going from
oVirt-3.1/Fedora 17 to >>>>
>> >>>>>>> oVirt-3.2/Fedora 18.
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> Indeed, I have not seen any documentation
>> in the wiki yet >>>> on >>>> >>>>>>>
upgrading >>>> >>>>>>> oVirt -
>> would you be interested in writing up your >>>> experiences
>>>>
>> >>>>>>> there as >>>>
>>>>>>> a guide to others?
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>> >>>> >>>>>>> Dave.
>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> That was my
intention to
>> share a working procedure once it >>>> was >>>>
>>>>>> complete but
>> I unfortunately hit a wall at >>>> "engine-upgrade". I
>>>> >>>>>>
>> would be very glad, and able to continue, if that obstacle >>>>
>> could >>>> >>>>>> be lifted.
>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> My experience in upgrading from
>> oVirt-3.1/Fedora 17 to >>>> >>>>> oVirt-3.2/Fedora
18:
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> On
Fedora 17:
>> >>>> >>>>> Be sure to have the latest updates running:
yum distro-sync
>> >>>> >>>>> Set exclude=ovirt* in /etc/yum.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> Execute: fedup --disablerepo=ovirt*
--network 18
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> When
you have a running Fedora 18:
>> >>>> >>>>> # systemctl list-units --failed
>> >>>> >>>>> UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB
DESCRIPTION
>> >>>> >>>>> httpd.service loaded failed failed The
Apache HTTP >>>>
>> Server
>> >>>> >>>>> postgresql.service loaded failed failed
PostgreSQL
>> database >>>> server
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> #
systemctl stop postgresql.service
>> >>>> >>>>> # tar cJvf pgsql-backup.tar.xz
/var/lib/pgsql/data/
>> >>>> >>>>> # yum install postgresql-upgrade
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # cp
/var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf
>> /root/pg_hba.conf.ovirt
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> edit
/var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf changing
>> md5 to trust >>>> on the >>>> >>>>> local
line.
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> #
diff -u pg_hba.conf.ovirt pg_hba.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> --- pg_hba.conf.ovirt 2013-01-30
20:58:49.404000000 +0100
>> >>>> >>>>> +++ pg_hba.conf 2013-01-30
20:59:06.709000000 +0100
>> >>>> >>>>> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
>> >>>> >>>>> # TYPE DATABASE USER ADDRESS
>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> METHOD
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> #
"local" is for Unix domain socket
>> connections only
>> >>>> >>>>> -local all all
>>>>
>> >>>> >>>>> md5
>> >>>> >>>>> +local all all
>>>>
>> >>>> >>>>> trust
>> >>>> >>>>> # IPv4 local connections:
>> >>>> >>>>> host all all 127.0.0.1/32
>>>>
>> >>>> >>>>> md5
>> >>>> >>>>> # IPv6 local connections:
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> #
postgresql-setup upgrade
>> >>>> >>>>> Redirecting to /bin/systemctl stop
postgresql.service
>> >>>> >>>>> Upgrading database: OK
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> See
/var/lib/pgsql/pgupgrade.log for details.
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # cp
/root/pg_hba.conf.ovirt
>> /var/lib/pgsql/data/pg_hba.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> # systemctl postgrsql.service restart
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> edit /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf:
>> >>>> >>>>> # diff -u ssl.conf.ovirt ssl.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> --- ssl.conf.ovirt 2013-01-30
21:21:06.906000000 +0100
>> >>>> >>>>> +++ ssl.conf 2013-01-30 21:22:02.757000000
+0100
>> >>>> >>>>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>> >>>> >>>>> # consult the online docs. You have been
warned. >>>>
>> >>>>> #
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>
-LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
>> >>>> >>>>> +#LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> #
>> >>>> >>>>> # When we also provide SSL we have to
listen to the >>>>
>> >>>>> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
>> >>>> >>>>> # Semaphore:
>> >>>> >>>>> # Configure the path to the mutual
exclusion semaphore
>> the
>> >>>> >>>>> # SSL engine uses internally for
inter-process >>>>
>> >>>>> synchronization. >>>> >>>>>
-SSLMutex default
>> >>>> >>>>> +#SSLMutex default
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> #
Pseudo Random Number Generator (PRNG):
>> >>>> >>>>> # Configure one or more sources to seed
the PRNG of the
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> # /bin/systemctl restart
>> httpd.service
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>
Remove the line exclude=ovirt* from /etc/yum.conf
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> # yum
update ovirt-engine-setup
>> >>>> >>>>> # engine-upgrade
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>
However, during the upgrade I've stepped into
>> >>>> >>>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906270
>> >>>> >>>>> We are still working on the upgrade
actions.
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Our
procedures looks almost exactly the same,
>> and we have >>>> gotten >>>> >>>> just as far
as you have. Good to
>> know.
>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> /Karli
>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
>> >>>> >> >>>> >> --
>> >>>> >> Sandro Bonazzola
>> >>>> >> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by
community
>> >>>> >> collaboration.
>> >>>> >> See how it works at
redhat.com
>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > --
>>>> > >>>> > Med Vänliga Hälsningar
>> >>>> > >>>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> > Karli Sjöberg
>> >>>> > Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
>> >>>> > Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8)
>> >>>> > S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
>> >>>> > Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66
>> >>>> > karli.sjoberg(a)slu.se
>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>>
>>> Med Vänliga Hälsningar
>> >>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> Karli Sjöberg
>> >>> Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
>> >>> Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8)
>> >>> S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
>> >>> Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66
>> >>> karli.sjoberg(a)slu.se
>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Users mailing list
>> >>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>> >>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> >>> >> >> > > -- > > Med Vänliga Hälsningar
>> >
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Karli Sjöberg
>> > Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
>> > Box 7079 (Visiting Address Kronåsvägen 8)
>> > S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
>> > Phone: +46-(0)18-67 15 66
>> > karli.sjoberg(a)slu.se
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users