6:12 p.m.
Hi Dimitru
I've seen that as well.....
I've deleted the dc01-node2 (ams03-hypersec02) from ovirt.
I've also issued ovs-vsctl emer-reset.
But ovn-sbctl list chassis still depicts the node twice.
The ovs-sbctl show still depicts 3 geneve tunnels from dc01-node2....
How, can we fix this?
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 9:59 AM Dumitru Ceara <dceara(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 9/30/20 3:41 PM, Konstantinos Betsis wrote:
> From the configuration I can see only three nodes.....
> "Encap":{
> #dc01-node02
>
"da8fb1dc-f832-4d62-a01d-2e5aef018c8d":{"ip":"10.137.156.56","chassis_name":"be3abcc9-7358-4040-a37b-8d8a782f239c","options":["map",[["csum","true"]]],"type":"geneve"},
> #dc01-node01
>
"4808bd8f-7e46-4f29-9a96-046bb580f0c5":{"ip":"10.137.156.55","chassis_name":"95ccb04a-3a08-4a62-8bc0-b8a7a42956f8","options":["map",[["csum","true"]]],"type":"geneve"},
> #dc02-node01
>
"f20b33ae-5a6b-456c-b9cb-2e4d8b54d8be":{"ip":"192.168.121.164","chassis_name":"c4b23834-aec7-4bf8-8be7-aa94a50a6144","options":["map",[["csum","true"]]],"type":"geneve"}}
>
> So I don't understand why the dc01-node02 tries to establish a tunnel
> with itself.....
>
> Is there a way for ovn to refresh according to Ovirt network database as
> to not affect VM networks?
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:33 PM Konstantinos Betsis <k.betsis(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:k.betsis@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Sure
>
> I've attached it for easier reference.
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:21 PM Dominik Holler <dholler(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:dholler@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 1:16 PM Konstantinos Betsis
> <k.betsis(a)gmail.com <mailto:k.betsis@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Dominik
>
> The DC01-node02 was formatted and reinstalled and then
> attached to ovirt environment.
> Unfortunately we exhibit the same issue.
> The new DC01-node02 tries to establish geneve tunnels to his
> own IP.
>
> [root@dc01-node02 ~]# ovs-vsctl show
> eff2663e-cb10-41b0-93ba-605bb5c7bd78
> Bridge br-int
> fail_mode: secure
> Port "ovn-95ccb0-0"
> Interface "ovn-95ccb0-0"
> type: geneve
> options: {csum="true", key=flow,
> remote_ip="dc01-node01_IP"}
> Port "ovn-be3abc-0"
> Interface "ovn-be3abc-0"
> type: geneve
> options: {csum="true", key=flow,
> remote_ip="dc01-node02_IP"}
> Port "ovn-c4b238-0"
> Interface "ovn-c4b238-0"
> type: geneve
> options: {csum="true", key=flow,
> remote_ip="dc02-node01_IP"}
> Port br-int
> Interface br-int
> type: internal
> ovs_version: "2.11.0"
>
>
> Is there a way to fix this on the Ovirt engine since this is
> where the information resides?
> Something is broken there.
>
>
> I suspect that there is an inconsistency in the OVN SB DB.
> Is there a way to share your /var/lib/openvswitch/ovnsb_db.db
> with us?
>
>
Hi Konstantinos,
One of the things I noticed in the SB DB you attached is that two of the
chassis records have the same hostname:
$ ovn-sbctl list chassis | grep ams03-hypersec02
hostname : ams03-hypersec02
hostname : ams03-hypersec02
This shouldn't be a major issue but shows a potential misconfiguration
on the nodes. Could you please double check the hostname configuration
of the nodes?
Would it also be possible to attach the openvswitch conf.db from the
three nodes? It should be in /var/lib/openvswitch/conf.db
Thanks,
Dumitru