Hello, on 4.1.6 I'm configuring fencing on HP blades Gen9. It seems I'm able to use ilo_ssh as agent and that I have only to set 22 as the port and ssh=1 in options Question: why ssh=1??? the agent is named ilo_ssh.... shouldn't be obvious??? The same form command line I MUST set -x even if I use fence_ilo_ssh command Nevertheless, this way I get successful test Sometimes I don't get the same result if I run from shell eg: fence_ilo_ssh -a ilo_ip -l fenceuser -S /usr/local/bin/my_fence_script.sh -x -o status I get sometimes: Unable to connect/login to fencing device I think it could be some sort of delay timeout. In fence_ilo_ssh I see these kinds of timeouts in help --power-timeout=[seconds] Test X seconds for status change after ON/OFF --shell-timeout=[seconds] Wait X seconds for cmd prompt after issuing command --login-timeout=[seconds] Wait X seconds for cmd prompt after login --power-wait=[seconds] Wait X seconds after issuing ON/OFF --delay=[seconds] Wait X seconds before fencing is started How do they map with gui settings options in case I would use some of them? Also, how do I map the command line option -4, --inet4-only Perhaps inet4_only=1 ? I see that ssh=1,inet4_only=1 works but also ssh=1,inet4_only=1,foo=1 works So it is not a reliable test to verify syntax... All in all do you think it is the best agent for ilo4 based blades? I have made some test with fence_ilo4 but unable to get success... what should I enable on ilo web administration page in this case, if you think the agent would be better for any reason? Thanks, Gianluca