Re: [Users] libvirt dependency vs. a way to have Solaris hosts in ovirt-engine

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:51:56AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:02:05AM +0100, Jiri Belka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > as you know Solaris (Open Indiana) has qemu-kvm although they > > don't use libvirt (in fact libvirt tighted to much to Linux > > specifics). I'm kind of surprised to hear you say that. One of libvirt's goals is portability, so if it doesn't work on Solaris now, you should mention it on libvir-list, and I wouldn't expect getting it to work would be that troublesome. Personally I don't use Solaris, but if it's something you want, you should ask and see what other people's experience is.