Re: [ovirt-users] Is oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 recommended for production usage?

On 06/24/2016 11:25 AM, Dewey Du wrote: I prefer deploying as a hyperconverged setup, but it is still under experiment, right? Hyperconverged deployment with oVirt and Gluster has been tested and is currently offered as a preview feature with guidance on do's/don'ts & recommended gluster volume settings. We're working on enhancing this further to make it easier to setup, integrate better in the oVirt UI in 4.1 So I try to separate vm service and storage. I added new storage domain( Domain Type "Data", Storage Type "GlusterFS", Use Host "host-01". But then I can't add another new storage domain( Domain Type "Data", Storage Type "GlusterFS", Use Host "host-02"). The input field "path" is unwritable (gray) on the Popup New Domain Window. My question is, should we add a new storage domain for each ovirt-node? No, you dont need to. This seems like a bug in the Create storage domain UI. Does refreshing your browser fix the greyed-out input field? Any errors seen in engine logs? On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Sahina Bose <sabose(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Make sure that you use replica 3 gluster volumes for storing VM images. > Are you planning to deploy as a hyperconverged setup? > Either way, try and use the latest ovirt 3.6 and glusterfs 3.7 (3.7.12 > that addresses bugs related to sharding and o-direct is due to be released > soon) > > On 06/21/2016 07:08 AM, Dewey Du wrote: > > I want to deploy oVirt 3.6 with GlusterFS 3.7 to my online servers. Is it > recommended for production usage? > > Thx. > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing listUsers@ovirt.orghttp://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > >