11:29 p.m.
--_ac814dda-1816-4974-9d7b-2b3ef0e06e8e_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue=2C 1 May 2012 17:20:24 -0400
From: acathrow(a)redhat.com
To: virtuallymad(a)gmail.com
CC: users(a)ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [Users] request for WOL
=20
=20
=20
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary Scarborough" <virtuallymad(a)gmail.com>
> To: users(a)ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday=2C May 1=2C 2012 3:58:41 PM
> Subject: [Users] request for WOL
>=20
>=20
> I would like to request Wake on LAN support be added to the Power
> Management interface. It seems like a good fall back for anyone who
> doesn't have proper power management capabilities.
=20
Fencing needs to reboot a node=2C WOL would only wake it up if it was sus=
pended.
=20
=20
>=20
> --
> Gary Scarborough
> IST Lab Manager
> Rochester Institute of Technology
> Rochester NY
>=20
But it could issue the reboot command via SSH no?I was also interested in
W=
OL and curious as to why it wasn't in there already. WOL allows the system =
to go into standby for power management (less desirable than Off=2C but sta=
ndby could return to service faster). For poweroff=2C the shutdown command =
could be passed via SSH=2C but the system would have to prompt that manual =
booting would be required. Unless the system supports boot on WOL request.=
=
--_ac814dda-1816-4974-9d7b-2b3ef0e06e8e_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt=3B
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>
>=3B Date: Tue=2C 1 May 2012 17:20:24 -0400<br>>=3B From:
acathrow@redh=
at.com<br>>=3B To: virtuallymad(a)gmail.com<br>&gt=3B CC:
users(a)ovirt.org<b=
r>>=3B Subject: Re: [Users] request for WOL<br>>=3B
<br>>=3B <br>>=
=3B <br>>=3B ----- Original Message -----<br>>=3B >=3B From:
"Gary Sc=
arborough" &lt=3Bvirtuallymad(a)gmail.com&gt=3B<br>&gt=3B >=3B
To: users@ov=
irt.org<br>>=3B >=3B Sent: Tuesday=2C May 1=2C 2012 3:58:41
PM<br>>=
=3B >=3B Subject: [Users] request for WOL<br>>=3B >=3B
<br>>=3B >=
=3B <br>>=3B >=3B I would like to request Wake on LAN support be added
=
to the Power<br>>=3B >=3B Management interface. It seems like a good
fa=
ll back for anyone who<br>>=3B >=3B doesn't have proper power
managemen=
t capabilities.<br>>=3B <br>>=3B Fencing needs to reboot a node=2C
WOL =
would only wake it up if it was suspended.<br>>=3B <br>>=3B
<br>>=3B =
>=3B <br>>=3B >=3B --<br>>=3B >=3B Gary
Scarborough<br>>=3B >=
=3B IST Lab Manager<br>>=3B >=3B Rochester Institute of
Technology<br>&=
gt=3B >=3B Rochester NY<br>>=3B >=3B <br>But it could issue
the reboo=
t command via SSH no?<BR>I was also interested in WOL and curious as to why=
it wasn't in there already. WOL allows the system to go into standby for p=
ower management (less desirable than Off=2C but standby could return to ser=
vice faster). For poweroff=2C the shutdown command could be passed via SSH=
=2C but the system would have to prompt that manual booting would be requir=
ed. =3B Unless the system supports boot on WOL request.<BR> =
</div></body>
</html>=
--_ac814dda-1816-4974-9d7b-2b3ef0e06e8e_--