8:50 p.m.
--=_6f090088-bbd5-43ea-a627-5730c19f42bd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
----- Original Message -----
<div>* GluserFS support as many of us</div><div>* Nova (OpenStack
Hyperviso=
r) driver support (<a href=3D"http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-com=
pute/admin/content/selecting-a-hypervisor.html"
target=3D"_blank">http://do=
cs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/selecting-a-hypervis=
or.html</a>).</div
<div>I choose oVirt because my first goal is to manage a virtualized datace=
nter with OSS. But we begin to look at private cloud deployement. </di=
v><div>I think Aeolus would work with oVirt virtualization backend but AFAI=
K it only support redhat based linux which is not possible for us as we run=
</div><div><br></div><div>Aelous has a RHEVM/oVirt driver
that works today.=
</div><div>If there are problems getting Aeolus working with oVirt we shoul=
d dig into it, there shouldn't be any
issues.</div><div><br></div
<div>almost only debian server except for virtualisation layer. So we would=
like to deploy OpenStack but to rely on oVirt for KVM hypervisors.</div><d=
iv><br></div><div>Out of interest what are you getting from OpenStack
that =
you don't get from oVirt</div><div><br></div><div>*
Fully supported statele=
ss ovirt-node</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div
<div><br></div><div>Romain</div><div><br><div
class=3D"gmail_quote">2012/6/=
28 Robert Middleswarth <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a
href=3D"mailto:robert@middl=
eswarth.net"
target=3D"_blank">robert(a)middleswarth.net</a>&gt;</span><br><b=
lockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"
<div class=3D"im">On 06/15/2012 06:23 AM, Dave Neary wrote:<br <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"
Hi,<br <br On
06/13/2012 04:28 PM, Dave Neary wrote:<br
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" So - how
are you using oVirt? Why did you choose it over alternatives?<br What do you like about it? and what would you like to see
change,<br whether that is in terms of
technical, process, or marketing changes?<br I'm
here to help, but to do so I need your help first!<br
</blockquote <br Thank you
to all those who have replied, on and off list, so far. For those=
of you who sent me private messages, I'll be (anonymously) collating your =
feedback and forwarding it on.<br
<br The range of users who have replied
so far includes:<br * Sysadmin at small web hosting
business<br * Cost-sensitive IT department of an
unrelated industry<br </blockquote></div That would be me.<div class=3D"im"><br <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" * Hosting
provider specialising in HA<br * Running a private cloud<br * Test lab set-up considering for production
deployment<br </blockquote></div Well no one should be crazy enough to go live with a product
they haven't a=
t least ran inside a testing lab.<div class=3D"im"><br <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"
<br And the top features you've
cited are:<br * Stateless hypervisor<br * Ability to migrate VMs<br
</blockquote></div Number one reason I am working with
oVirt<br <blockquote
class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" * RHEL
and KVM<br </blockquote We are a debian based org so changing over to the RHEL based
OS's is more a=
pain then a benefit. KVM is still kinda young compared to both Xen /=
Vmware it seems to work well but there aren't as many os's covered by the =
vitro drivers and there seem to be more bugs / race conditions but that has=
been steadily changing as it has been getting more mature<div class=3D"im"=
<br <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" *
Cost<br * The ability to have your preferred
OS as both hypervisor and guest as a f=
irst class citizen<br * Aimed for data center use-case
rather than cloud<br </blockquote></div This would be number 2 in the list.<div
class=3D"im"><br <br
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" And the
top gaps you've identified so far:<br *
Insufficient resources (docs) to help with production deployment on <a hr=
ef=3D"http://ovirt.org"
target=3D"_blank">ovirt.org</a><br *
Difficulty of configuration and getting started<br *
You'd like to see a more diverse contributor community<br * Stability (unfortunately, I don't have any concrete
examples of this from=
the commenter)<br * History on resource usage in
hypervisors and guests<br * Integration with Gluster<br * Offer choices of guest agents with other distributions than
RHEL<br <br
</blockquote></div I could have created this list
myself. I have hit pretty much every o=
ne of these limits in the last few months working with the project. 3=
.1 adds limited support for Gluster and ovirt seems to be more stable dispu=
te F17 instability.<br
<br As for the question of stability the file storage system in 3.0
can be a bi=
t unstable. If your NFS share disappears for a few mins the fil=
e system tends to go offline and wont reactivate. Not sure about iscs=
i or FC since I don't have access to those file systems.<div class=3D"im HO=
EnZb"
<br <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" This is
all giving me great insight into who's here - please keep it coming=
!<br <br Cheers,<br Dave.<br
<br </blockquote <br <br></div><div
class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br Users mailing list<br <a
href=3D"mailto:Users@ovirt.org"
target=3D"_blank">Users(a)ovirt.org</a><br=
<a
href=3D"http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users"
target=3D"_blank"=
>http://lists.ovirt.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/users</a><br
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div
<br>_______________________________________________<br>Arch mailing
list<br=
--=_6f090088-bbd5-43ea-a627-5730c19f42bd--
From: "Romain Vrignaud" <rvrignaud(a)gmail.com To: "Dave Neary" <dneary(a)redhat.com>,
"arch" <arch(a)ovirt.org>,
"Users" <users(a)ovirt.org>, "board" <board(a)ovirt.org Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 4:13:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Users] What are you looking for from oVirt?
Hello,
I don't run currently any oVirt deployement in production but I
have
a lab.
I used to run in production the old oVirt product (in rails).
My best wishes for the future release of oVirt are :
* GluserFS support as many of us
* Nova (OpenStack Hypervisor) driver support (
http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/selecting...
).
I choose oVirt because my first goal is to manage a virtualized
datacenter with OSS. But we begin to look at private cloud
deployement.
I think Aeolus would work with oVirt virtualization backend but AFAIK
it only support redhat based linux which is not possible for us as
we run
Aelous has a RHEVM/oVirt driver that works today.
If there are problems getting Aeolus working with oVirt we should dig
into it, there shouldn't be any issues.
almost only debian server except for virtualisation layer. So we
would like to deploy OpenStack but to rely on oVirt for KVM
hypervisors.
Out of interest what are you getting from OpenStack that you
don't
get from oVirt
* Fully supported stateless ovirt-node
Regards,
Romain
2012/6/28 Robert Middleswarth < robert(a)middleswarth.net >
> On 06/15/2012 06:23 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > On 06/13/2012 04:28 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> > > So - how are you using oVirt? Why did you choose it
over
> > > alternatives?
> >
>
> > > What do you like about it? and what would you like to see
> > > change,
> >
>
> > > whether that is in terms of technical, process, or marketing
> > > changes?
> >
>
> > > I'm here to help, but to do so I need your help first!
> >
>
> > Thank you to all those who have replied, on and off list,
so far.
> > For
> > those of you who sent me private messages, I'll be (anonymously)
> > collating your feedback and forwarding it on.
>
> > The range of users who have replied so far includes:
>
> > * Sysadmin at small web hosting business
>
> > * Cost-sensitive IT department of an unrelated industry
>
> That would be me.
> > * Hosting provider specialising in HA
>
> > * Running a private cloud
>
> > * Test lab set-up considering for production deployment
>
> Well no one should be crazy enough to go live with a product
they
> haven't at least ran inside a testing lab.
> > And the top features you've cited are:
>
> > * Stateless hypervisor
>
> > * Ability to migrate VMs
>
> Number one reason I am working with oVirt
> > * RHEL and KVM
>
> We are a debian based org so changing over to the RHEL based
OS's
> is
> more a pain then a benefit. KVM is still kinda young compared to
> both Xen / Vmware it seems to work well but there aren't as many
> os's covered by the vitro drivers and there seem to be more bugs /
> race conditions but that has been steadily changing as it has been
> getting more mature
> > * Cost
>
> > * The ability to have your preferred OS as both hypervisor and
> > guest
> > as a first class citizen
>
> > * Aimed for data center use-case rather than cloud
>
> This would be number 2 in the list.
> > And the top gaps you've identified so far:
>
> > * Insufficient resources (docs) to help with production
> > deployment
> > on
> > ovirt.org
>
> > * Difficulty of configuration and getting started
>
> > * You'd like to see a more diverse contributor community
>
> > * Stability (unfortunately, I don't have any concrete examples of
> > this from the commenter)
>
> > * History on resource usage in hypervisors and guests
>
> > * Integration with Gluster
>
> > * Offer choices of guest agents with other distributions than
> > RHEL
>
> I could have created this list myself. I have hit pretty much
every
> one of these limits in the last few months working with the
> project.
> 3.1 adds limited support for Gluster and ovirt seems to be more
> stable dispute F17 instability.
> As for the question of stability the file storage system in 3.0
can
> be a bit unstable. If your NFS share disappears for a few mins the
> file system tends to go offline and wont reactivate. Not sure about
> iscsi or FC since I don't have access to those file systems.
> > This is all giving me great insight into who's here -
please keep
> > it
> > coming!
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Dave.
>
> ______________________________ _________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/ mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Arch mailing list
Arch(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
--=_6f090088-bbd5-43ea-a627-5730c19f42bd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head><style type=3D'text/css'>p { margin: 0;
}</style></head><body><=
div style=3D'font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'=
<br><br><hr id=3D"zwchr"><blockquote
style=3D"border-left:2px solid rgb(16=
, 16,
255);margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;f=
ont-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-seri=
f;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Romain Vrignaud"
&lt;rvrignaud(a)gmail.com&g=
t;<br><b>To: </b>"Dave Neary"
&lt;dneary(a)redhat.com&gt;, "arch" <arch@ov=
irt.org>, "Users" &lt;users(a)ovirt.org&gt;, "board"
&lt;board(a)ovirt.org&g=
t;<br><b>Sent: </b>Friday, June 29, 2012 4:13:32
AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: =
[Users] What are you looking for from
oVirt?<br><br>Hello,<div><br></div><d=
iv>I don't run currently any oVirt deployement in production but I have a l=
ab. </div><div>I used to run in production the old oVirt product (in
r=
ails).</div><div><br></div><div>My best wishes for the
future release of oV=
irt are : </divArch@ovirt.org<br>http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch<br></blockq=
uote><br></div></body></html