On 12 Mar 2016, at 17:04, Nir Soffer <nsoffer(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Samuli Heinonen <samppah(a)neutraali.net> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> It seems that oVirt 3.6 is still using FUSE to access GlusterFS storage domains
instead of using QEMU driver (libgfapi). As far as I know libgfapi support should be
available in Libvirt and QEMU packages provided in CentOS 7.
We started to work this during 3.6 development, but the work was
suspended because
libvirt and qemu do not support multiple gluster servers [1]. This
means that if your single
server is down, you will not be able to connect to glister.
Since this is only used to fetch volume information when connecting to Gluster volume I
don’t think it should be treated as blocking issue. If we lose one storage server that’s a
problem we have to fix as soon as possible anyway. Even then hypervisors are already
connected to other storage servers and there is no need to fetch volume information again.
Also there are other ways to work around this like having a separate hostname that is used
to fetch volume information and which can then be pointed to server that’s up.
It would be great if libgfapi could be available even as selectable option so it could be
tested in real world situation.
Recently Niels suggested that we use DNS for this purpose - if the
DNS
return multiple
servers, libgafpi should be able to failover to one of these servers,
so connecting with
single server address should good as multiple server support in libvirt or qemu.
The changes needed to support this are not big as you can see in [2],
[3]. However the work
was not completed and I don't know if it will completed for 4.0.
Thank you for these links. I’ll see if this is something we can try out in our test
environment
Best regards,
Samuli
> Is there any workarounds how to use libgfapi with oVirt before it’s officially
available?
I don't know about any.
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1247521
[2]
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/44061
[3]
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/33768
Nir