El 2016-04-30 23:22, Nir Soffer escribió:
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:48 AM, <nicolas@devels.es> wrote:
El 2016-04-30 22:37, Nir Soffer escribió:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 7:16 PM, <nicolas@devels.es> wrote:
El 2016-04-30 16:55, Nir Soffer escribió:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Nicolás <nicolas@devels.es> wrote: > > > Hi Nir, > > El 29/04/16 a las 22:34, Nir Soffer escribió: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:17 PM, <nicolas@devels.es> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We're running oVirt 3.6.5.3-1 and lately we're experiencing >>> some >>> issues >>> with >>> some VMs being paused because they're marked as non-responsive. >>> Mostly, >>> after a few seconds they recover, but we want to debug >>> precisely >>> this >>> problem so we can fix it consistently. >>> >>> Our scenario is the following: >>> >>> ~495 VMs, of which ~120 are constantly up >>> 3 datastores, all of them iSCSI-based: >>> * ds1: 2T, currently has 276 disks >>> * ds2: 2T, currently has 179 disks >>> * ds3: 500G, currently has 65 disks >>> 7 hosts: All have mostly the same hardware. CPU and memory are >>> currently >>> very lowly used (< 10%). >>> >>> ds1 and ds2 are physically the same backend which exports >>> two 2TB >>> volumes. >>> ds3 is a different storage backend where we're currently >>> migrating >>> some >>> disks from ds1 and ds2. >> >> >> >> What the the storage backend behind ds1 and 2? > > > > > The storage backend for ds1 and ds2 is the iSCSI-based HP > LeftHand > P4000 > G2. > >>> Usually, when VMs become unresponsive, the whole host where >>> they run >>> gets >>> unresponsive too, so that gives a hint about the problem, my >>> bet is >>> the >>> culprit is somewhere on the host side and not on the VMs side. >> >> >> >> Probably the vm became unresponsive because connection to the >> host >> was >> lost. > > > > > I forgot to mention that less commonly we have situations where > the > host > doesn't get unresponsive but the VMs on it do and they don't > become > responsive ever again, so we have to forcibly power them off and > start > them > on a different host. But in this case the connection with the > host > doesn't > ever get lost (so basically the host is Up, but any VM run on > them is > unresponsive). > > >>> When that >>> happens, the host itself gets non-responsive and only >>> recoverable >>> after >>> reboot, since it's unable to reconnect. >> >> >> >> Piotr, can you check engine log and explain why host is not >> reconnected? >> >>> I must say this is not specific to >>> this oVirt version, when we were using v.3.6.4 the same >>> happened, >>> and >>> it's >>> also worthy mentioning we've not done any configuration changes >>> and >>> everything had been working quite well for a long time. >>> >>> We were monitoring our ds1 and ds2 physical backend to see >>> performance >>> and >>> we suspect we've run out of IOPS since we're reaching the >>> maximum >>> specified >>> by the manufacturer, probably at certain times the host cannot >>> perform >>> a >>> storage operation within some time limit and it marks VMs as >>> unresponsive. >>> That's why we've set up ds3 and we're migrating ds1 and ds2 to >>> ds3. >>> When >>> we >>> run out of space on ds3 we'll create more smaller volumes to >>> keep >>> migrating. >>> >>> On the host side, when this happens, we've run repoplot on the >>> vdsm >>> log >>> and >>> I'm attaching the result. Clearly there's a *huge* LVM response >>> time >>> (~30 >>> secs.). >> >> >> >> Indeed the log show very slow vgck and vgs commands - these are >> called >> every >> 5 minutes for checking the vg health and refreshing vdsm lvm >> cache. >> >> 1. starting vgck >> >> Thread-96::DEBUG::2016-04-29 >> 13:17:48,682::lvm::290::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(cmd) >> /usr/bin/taskset >> --cpu-list 0-23 /usr/bin/sudo -n /usr/sbin/lvm vgck --config ' >> devices >> { pre >> ferred_names = ["^/dev/mapper/"] ignore_suspended_devices=1 >> write_cache_state=0 disable_after_error_count=3 filter = [ >> '\''a|/dev/mapper/36000eb3a4f1acbc20000000000000043|'\ >> '', '\''r|.*|'\'' ] } global { locking_type=1 >> prioritise_write_locks=1 wait_for_locks=1 use_lvmetad=0 } >> backup { >> retain_min = 50 retain_days = 0 } ' 5de4a000-a9c4-48 >> 9c-8eee-10368647c413 (cwd None) >> >> 2. vgck ends after 55 seconds >> >> Thread-96::DEBUG::2016-04-29 >> 13:18:43,173::lvm::290::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(cmd) SUCCESS: >> <err> = ' >> WARNING: lvmetad is running but disabled. Restart lvmetad before >> enabling it!\n'; <rc> = 0 >> >> 3. starting vgs >> >> Thread-96::DEBUG::2016-04-29 >> 13:17:11,963::lvm::290::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(cmd) >> /usr/bin/taskset >> --cpu-list 0-23 /usr/bin/sudo -n /usr/sbin/lvm vgs --config ' >> devices >> { pref >> erred_names = ["^/dev/mapper/"] ignore_suspended_devices=1 >> write_cache_state=0 disable_after_error_count=3 filter = [ >> '\''a|/dev/mapper/36000eb3a4f1acbc20000000000000043|/de >> >> >> >> v/mapper/36000eb3a4f1acbc200000000000000b9|/dev/mapper/360014056f0dc8930d744f83af8ddc709|/dev/mapper/WDC_WD5003ABYZ-011FA0_WD-WMAYP0J73DU6|'\'', >> '\''r|.*|'\'' ] } global { >> locking_type=1 prioritise_write_locks=1 wait_for_locks=1 >> use_lvmetad=0 } backup { retain_min = 50 retain_days = 0 } ' >> --noheadings --units b --nosuffix --separator '| >> ' --ignoreskippedcluster -o >> >> >> >> uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name >> 5de4a000-a9c4-489c-8eee-10368 >> 647c413 (cwd None) >> >> 4. vgs finished after 37 seconds >> >> Thread-96::DEBUG::2016-04-29 >> 13:17:48,680::lvm::290::Storage.Misc.excCmd::(cmd) SUCCESS: >> <err> = ' >> WARNING: lvmetad is running but disabled. Restart lvmetad before >> enabling it!\n'; <rc> = 0 >> >> Zdenek, how do you suggest to debug this slow lvm commands? >> >> Can you run the following commands on a host in trouble, and on >> some >> other >> hosts in the same timeframe? >> >> time vgck -vvvv --config ' devices { filter = >> ['\''a|/dev/mapper/36000eb3a4f1acbc20000000000000043|'\'', >> '\''r|.*|'\'' ] } global { locking_type=1 >> prioritise_write_locks=1 >> wait_for_locks=1 use_lvmetad=0 } backup { retain_min = 50 >> retain_days = 0 } ' 5de4a000-a9c4-489c-8eee-10368647c413 >> >> time vgs -vvvv --config ' global { locking_type=1 >> prioritise_write_locks=1 wait_for_locks=1 use_lvmetad=0 } >> backup { >> retain_min = 50 retain_days = 0 } ' >> 5de4a000-a9c4-489c-8eee-10368647c413 >> >> Note that I added -vvvv to both commands, this will generate >> huge >> amount >> of debugging info. Please share the output of these commands. >> >> You may need to fix the commands. You can always copy and paste >> directly >> from vdsm log into the shell and add the -vvvv flag. >> > > Indeed, there seems to be a big difference on hosts 5 and 6. I'm > attaching > the results of the execution of both commands on all hosts. Both > commands > show a pretty bigger output on hosts 5 and 6, and also a much > bigger > execution time. Times are also attached in a file called TIMES. > >>> Our host storage network is correctly configured and on a 1G >>> interface, no errors on the host itself, switches, etc. >> >> >> >> 1G serving about 20-70 vms per host? (495 vms, 120 always up, 7 >> hosts)? >> >> Do you have separate network for management and storage, or both >> use this 1G interface? > > > > > Yes, we have separate networks for management, storage and > motion. > Storage > and motion have 1G each (plus, for storage we use a bond of 2 > interfaces > in > ALB-mode (6)). Currently no host has more than 30 VMs at a time. > >>> We've also limited storage in QoS to use 10MB/s and 40 IOPS, >> >> >> >> How did you configure this limit? > > > > > In the Data Center tab, I chose our DC and a QoS sub-tab appears, > just > like > described here: > http://www.ovirt.org/documentation/sla/network-qos/ > >> >>> but this issue >>> still happens, which leads me to be concerned whether this is >>> not >>> just >>> an >>> IOPS issue; each host handles about cca. 600 LVs. Could this be >>> an >>> issue >>> too? I remark the LVM response times are low in normal >>> conditions >>> (~1-2 >>> seconds). >> >> >> >> We recommend to limit number lvs per vg to 350. If you have 276 >> disks >> on >> ds1, and the disks are using snapshots, you may have too many >> lvs, >> which >> can cause slowdowns in lvm operations. >> >> Can you share the output of: >> >> vdsm-tool dump-volume-chains >> 5de4a000-a9c4-489c-8eee-10368647c413 > > > > > Ok, right now no VG has more than 350 VGs so I guess this is not > currently > the problem. Unfortunately, I run the vdsm-tool command but it > didn't > end > nor provide any output in cca. 1 hour, so I guess it was hanged > and I > stopped it. If you confirm this is a normal execution time I can > leave > it > running whatever time it takes. > > host5:~# vgs > VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize > VFree > 0927c050-6fb6-463c-bb37-8b8da641dcd3 1 63 0 wz--n- 499,62g > 206,50g > 5de4a000-a9c4-489c-8eee-10368647c413 1 335 0 wz--n- 2,00t > 518,62g > b13b9eac-1f2e-4a7e-bcd9-49f5f855c3d8 1 215 0 wz--n- 2,00t > 495,25g > sys_vg 1 6 0 wz--n- 136,44g > 122,94g >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm attaching the vdsm.log, engine.log and repoplot PDF; >> >> >> >> This is very useful, thanks. Can you send also the vdsm logs and >> repoplots >> from other hosts for the same timeframe? >> >>> if someone could >>> give a hint on some additional problems in them and shed some >>> light >>> on >>> the >>> above thoughts I'd be very grateful. >> >> >> >> Do you have sar configured on the host? having sar logs can >> reveal >> more >> info about this timeframe. >> >> Do you have information about amount of io from vms during this >> timeframe? >> amount of io on the storage backend during this timeframe? > > > > > Not currently, but I'll be alert for the time this happens again > and > I'll > check some sar commands related to I/O and I'll provide feedback. > Nevertheless, by the time I run the commands above no machine was > unresponsive and I'm still getting such huge execution times. I > tried > running iotop now and I see there are 2 vgck and vgs processes > with a > rate > of ~500Kb/s each for reading. > > root 24446 1.3 0.0 57008 6824 ? D< 09:15 0:00 > /usr/sbin/lvm vgs --config devices { preferred_names = > ["^/dev/mapper/"] > ignore_suspended_devices=1 write_cache_state=0 > disable_after_error_count=3 > filter = [ > > > 'a|/dev/mapper/36000eb3a4f1acbc20000000000000043|/dev/mapper/36000eb3a4f1acbc200000000000000b9|/dev/mapper/360014056f0dc8930d744f83af8ddc709|', > 'r|.*|' ] } global { locking_type=1 prioritise_write_locks=1 > wait_for_locks=1 use_lvmetad=0 } backup { retain_min = 50 > retain_days > = 0 > } --noheadings --units b --nosuffix --separator | > --ignoreskippedcluster > -o > > > uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name > b13b9eac-1f2e-4a7e-bcd9-49f5f855c3d > > I'm also attaching the iostat output for host 5 in a file called > iostat-host5.
Interesting, all hosts are checking the same storage, but on host5 and host6 the output of vgs and vgck is 10 times bigger - this explain why they take about 10 times longer to run.
$ ls -lh vgs-* -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 221K Apr 30 08:55 vgs-host1 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 239K Apr 30 08:55 vgs-host2 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 228K Apr 30 08:55 vgs-host3 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 288K Apr 30 08:55 vgs-host4 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 2.2M Apr 30 08:55 vgs-host5 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 2.2M Apr 30 08:55 vgs-host6 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 232K Apr 30 08:55 vgs-host7 $ ls -lh vgck-* -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 238K Apr 30 08:55 vgck-host1 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 254K Apr 30 08:55 vgck-host2 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 244K Apr 30 08:55 vgck-host3 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 298K Apr 30 08:55 vgck-host4 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 2.0M Apr 30 08:55 vgck-host5 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 2.0M Apr 30 08:55 vgck-host6 -rw-r--r--. 1 nsoffer nsoffer 248K Apr 30 08:55 vgck-host7
Can you do collect the output of "dmsetup table -v" on host 1, 5, and 6?
Nir
Sure, please find attached results of the command. Once again, for hosts 5 and 6 the size is 10 times bigger than for host 1.
I think the issue causing slow vgs and vgck commands is stale lvs on host 5 and 6. This may be the root caused for paused vms, but I cannot explain how it is related yet.
Comparing vgck on host1 and host5 - we can see that vgck opens 213 /dev/mapper/* devices, actually 53 uniq devices, most of them are opened 4 times. On host5, vgck opens 2489 devices (622 uniq). This explains why the operation takes about 10 times longer.
Checking dmsteup table output, we can see that host1 has 53 devices, and host5 622 devices.
Checking the device open count, host1 has 15 stale devices (Open count: 0), but host5 has 597 stale devices.
Leaving stale devices is a known issue, but we never had evidence that it cause trouble except warnings in lvm commands.
Please open an ovirt bug about this issue, and include all the files you sent so far in this thread, and all the vdsm logs on host5.
To remove the stale devices, you can do:
for name in `dmsetup info -c -o open,name | awk '/ 0 / {print $2}'`; do echo "removing stale device: $name" dmsetup remove $name done
Note that this cleanup is safe only in maintenance mode, since it will also remove the mapping for vdsm special lvs (ids, leases, inbox, outbox, master, metatada) that are accessed by vdsm regularly, and are not stale.
This is also not safe if you use hosted engine, hosted engine agent should maintain its vg.
The safest way to remove stale devices is to restart vdsm - it deactivates all unused lvs (except special lvs) during startup.
Hm, I run it without even putting the host on maintenance, but I will next time. Fortunately it seems it didn't do any harm and everything is working. I'll probably do a script that will put host on maintenance, cleanup or restart vdsm and start again (this is not a hosted engine) if the number of stale devices is bigger than a threshold.
I would not do anything automatic at this point except monitoring this issue.
For cleanup - you have 2 options:
- host is up - restart vdsm - host in maintenance - remove stale devices
Based on local testing, I think the issue is this:
- When connecting to storage, all lvs becomes active - this may be a change in lvm during el 7 development that we did not notice.
- Each time vdsm is restarted, all active lvs that should not be active are deactivated during vdsm startup
- When deactivating storage domain, vdsm does not deactivate the lvs leaving stale devices.
Can you confirm that works like this on your system?
To test this:
I did these tests on host5. Before switching the host to maintenance, I run the vgck command and execution time was: 0m1.347s. Current stale devices at that time were: 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-master 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-outbox 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-metadata 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-ids 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-leases 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-inbox b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-leases b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-metadata b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-ids b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-inbox 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-leases 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-master 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-metadata b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-master 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-outbox 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-inbox b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-outbox 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-ids (seems there were not any new stale devices since yesterday after running the loop).
1. Put one host to maintenance
You should see some stale devices - the special lvs (ids, leases, master, metadata, inbox, outbox)
And probably 2 OVF_STORE lvs per vg (128m lvs used to store vm ovf)
Still had the same devices as above.
2. Cleanup the stale devices
After cleaning the stale devices, those remained: 36000eb3a4f1acbc20000000000000043 360014056f0dc8930d744f83af8ddc709 36000eb3a4f1acbc200000000000000b9
3. Activate host
You should see again about 600 stale devices, and lvm commands will probably run much slower as you reported.
Current stale devices were these: 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-master 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-outbox 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-metadata 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-leases 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-inbox b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-leases b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-metadata b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-inbox 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-leases 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-master 5de4a000--a9c4--489c--8eee--10368647c413-metadata b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-master 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-outbox b13b9eac--1f2e--4a7e--bcd9--49f5f855c3d8-outbox 0927c050--6fb6--463c--bb37--8b8da641dcd3-inbox
4. Restart vdsm
All the regular lvs should be inactive now, no stale devices should exists, except the special lvs (expected)
Same result as above. The strange thing is that now I don't see any VGs running the 'vgs' command but the system's: host5:~# vgs VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree sys_vg 1 6 0 wz--n- 136,44g 122,94g However, machines running on that host have no issues and storage is working well. vgscan doesn't do the trick either. I tested this on host6 too and the same happens: After reactivating host I cannot see VGs with the vgs command - however, everything seems to work quite well. This is CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 FWIW.
Nir