----- Original Message -----
From: "Barak Azulay" <bazulay@redhat.com> To: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo@redhat.com> Cc: Users@ovirt.org, devel@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 1:13:13 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] [ovirt-devel] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 status (postponed)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo@redhat.com> To: "Barak Azulay" <bazulay@redhat.com> Cc: Users@ovirt.org, devel@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 12:38:04 PM Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 status (postponed)
Il 18/08/2014 11:20, Barak Azulay ha scritto:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo@redhat.com> To: Users@ovirt.org, devel@ovirt.org Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 10:32:04 AM Subject: [ovirt-devel] [QE][ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 status (postponed)
Hi, since we have still too many blockers for oVirt 3.5.0 RC2 release, we need to postpone it again to Thu *2014-08-21 08:00 UTC*
Due to this delay, the oVirt schedule has changed as follow: - General availability: 2014-09-03 (Wed) - oVirt 3.5 Third Test Day: 2014-08-28 (Thu) - RC2 Build: 2014-08-21 (Thu)
Maintainers: - Please be sure that 3.5 snapshot allow to create VMs before *2014-08-20 15:00 UTC* - Please be sure that no pending patches are going to block the release before *2014-08-20 15:00 UTC* - If any patch must block the RC release please raise the issue as soon as possible.
The bug tracker [1] shows the following proposed blockers to be reviewed:
Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary 1127877 infra ASSIGNED vdsm-tool configure --force does not configure qemu.conf properly in the first run on a fresh install
The above is not a blocker, Anyway we'll try to push it ASAP .. patch in discussion.
Well, looks like it will cause Hosted Engine deployment failure on a clean system.
It depends how the hosted engine setup is implemented - I have never used it
Not sure if it may cause also a failure adding a clean system to the Engine.
no it shouldn't
It should, as starting vdsm fails - this should fail in the same way as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1125178 I don't know if this is a regression from 3.4, maybe it was the same. Nir