--Apple-Mail=_1ACF3B32-08CE-4A06-AC57-0A55A02AB107
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Hello,
What version of GlusterFS you are using?
ml ml <mliebherr99(a)googlemail.com> kirjoitti 8.2.2014 kello 21.24:
anyone?
=20
On Friday, February 7, 2014, ml ml <mliebherr99(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Hello List,
=20
i set up a Cluster with 2 Nodes and Glusterfs.
=20
=20
gluster> volume info all
=20
Volume Name: Repl2
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: 8af9b282-8b60-4d71-a0fd-9116b8fdcca7
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 =3D 2
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: node1.local:/data
Brick2: node2.local:/data
Options Reconfigured:
auth.allow: *
user.cifs: enable
nfs.disable: off
=20
=20
I turned node2 off. Just to make sure i have not network bottle neck =
and that it
will not replicate for my first benchmarks.
=20
=20
My first test with bonnie on my local raw disk of node1 gave me =
130MB/sec write
speed.
Then i did the same test on my cluster dir /data: 130MB/sec
Then i did the write test in a freshly installed Debian 7 vm: 10MB/sec=20=
=20
This is terrible and i wonder why?!
=20
My tests where made with:
bonnie++ -u root -s <double mem) -d <dir>
=20
Here are my bonnie results:
http://oi62.tinypic.com/20aara0.jpg
=20
=20
Since node2 is turned off, this cant be a network bottle neck.
=20
Any ideas?=20
=20
Thanks,
Mario
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--Apple-Mail=_1ACF3B32-08CE-4A06-AC57-0A55A02AB107
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=iso-8859-1
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body
style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break:
after-white-space; ">Hello,<div><br></div><div>What
version of GlusterFS you are
using?</div><div><br><div><div><div>ml ml
<<a
href="mailto:mliebherr99@googlemail.com">mliebherr99@googlemail.com</a>>
kirjoitti 8.2.2014 kello 21.24:</div><br
class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote
type="cite">anyone?<br><br>On Friday, February 7, 2014, ml ml
<<a
href="mailto:mliebherr99@googlemail.com">mliebherr99@googlemail.com</a>>
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div
dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div>Hello
List,<br><br></div>i set up a Cluster with 2 Nodes and
Glusterfs.<br><br><br>gluster> volume info
all<br> <br>Volume Name: Repl2<br>Type:
Replicate<br>Volume ID: 8af9b282-8b60-4d71-a0fd-9116b8fdcca7<br>
Status: Started<br>Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2<br>Transport-type:
tcp<br>Bricks:<br>Brick1: node1.local:/data<br>Brick2:
node2.local:/data<br>Options Reconfigured:<br>auth.allow:
*<br>user.cifs: enable<br>nfs.disable: off<br>
<br><br></div>I turned node2 off. Just to make sure i have not network
bottle neck and that it will not replicate for my first
benchmarks.<br><br><br></div>My first test with bonnie on my local
raw disk of node1 gave me 130MB/sec write speed.<br>
</div>Then i did the same test on my cluster dir /data:
130MB/sec<br></div>Then i did the write test in a freshly installed Debian 7
vm: 10MB/sec <br><br></div>This is terrible and i wonder
why?!<br><br>My tests where made with:<br>
bonnie++ -u root -s <double mem) -d
<dir><br><div><br></div><div>Here are my
bonnie results: <a
href="http://oi62.tinypic.com/20aara0.jpg"
target="_blank">http://oi62.tinypic.com/20aara0.jpg</a>...
<div>Since node2 is turned off, this cant be a network bottle neck.<br>
<br></div><div>Any ideas?
<br><br></div><div>Thanks,<br>Mario<br></div></div>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________<br>Users mailing list<br><a
href="mailto:Users@ovirt.org">Users@ovirt.org</a><br>http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>
--Apple-Mail=_1ACF3B32-08CE-4A06-AC57-0A55A02AB107--