Hi Denis,
Ok I will file a bug for this.
I am not sure if I will be able to provide troubleshooting info for much
long as I already have put forward the replacement of disks with 512 ones.
Alex
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Denis Chaplygin <dchaplyg(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Hello Alex,
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Abi Askushi <rightkicktech(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Sahina,
>
> Did you have the chance to check the logs and have any idea how this may
> be addressed?
>
It seems to be a VDSM issue, as VDSM uses direct IO (and id actualy calls
dd) and assumes that block size is 512. I see in the code, that block size
is defined as a constant, so it probably may be adjusted, but i think it
would be better if we ask some one who knows that part better.
Anyway, could you please file a bug on that issue? Thanks in advance.