I did not run into this problem at all ( neither on my cos6.4 nor on my 6.5 hosts ). The "virtual-host" profile was chosen automatically, installation of vdsm was literally as simple as adding the following lines in the %post section of my kickstart file: rpm -ivh http://ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-el.noarch.rpm rpm -ivh http://mirror.1000mbps.com/fedora-epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm yum -y update epel-release yum -y install vdsm On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Ted Miller <tmiller@hcjb.org> wrote:
I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos hosts.
One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At the time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just a warning, so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a warning, a lot of people are probably missing it.
When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a "rhs-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. I substituted the "virtual-host" profile.
I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293, where "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for RHEV + RHS. I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV + RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not appropriate.
My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses "rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls back to "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences there are between the two profiles.)
Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?
Ted Miller
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users