I did not run into this problem at all ( neither on my cos6.4 nor on
my 6.5 hosts ).
The "virtual-host" profile was chosen automatically, installation of
vdsm was literally
as simple as adding the following lines in the %post section of my
kickstart file:
rpm -ivh
http://ovirt.org/releases/ovirt-release-el.noarch.rpm
rpm -ivh
http://mirror.1000mbps.com/fedora-epel/6/i386/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm
yum -y update epel-release
yum -y install vdsm
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Ted Miller <tmiller(a)hcjb.org> wrote:
I posted a script (a while back) to get oVirt running on Centos
hosts.
One of the items in it has to do with what "tuned" profile to use. At the
time I first ran into it, this was a fatal error. It is now just a warning,
so it does not prevent installing a host. But, as a warning, a lot of
people are probably missing it.
When using Centos 6 as the host OS, the script tries to install a
"rhs-virtualization" profile. That profile is not included in Centos. I
substituted the "virtual-host" profile.
I believe that this may be a regression as a result of Bugzilla 987293,
where "rhs-virtualization" was substituted for "virtual-host" for
RHEV +
RHS. I am guessing that whatever is used as a switch to determine RHEV +
RHS is also shoving Centos into that same path, which is not appropriate.
My suggestion would be to write the script so that it uses
"rhs-virtualization" when present, and if it is not present, then it falls
back to "virtual-host". (I don't know what (if any) differences there are
between the two profiles.)
Should I open a new bug, make a comment on 987293, or take some other path?
Ted Miller
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users