@Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@k0ste.ru> :
I recommend to look to OpenStack or some OpenNebula/Proxmox if you wan’t use Ceph Storage.
I have tested all options but oVirt seems to tick most required boxes. OpenStack : Too complex for use case Proxmox : Love Ceph support but very basic clustering support OpenNebula : Weird VM state machine. Not sure if you know that rbd-nbd support is going to be implemented to Cinderlib. I could understand why oVirt wants to support CinderLib and deprecate Cinder support. @Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg@yahoo.com>
Most probably it will be easier if you stick with full-blown distro.
Yesterday, I was able to bring up a single host single disk Ceph cluster on oVirt Node NG 4.4.4 after enabling some repositories. Having said that, I didn't try image based upgrades to host. I read somewhere that rpms are persisted between host upgrades in Node NG now. @Benny Zlotnik
Moreover, it is not possible to use a pure Managed Block Storage setup at all, there has to be at least one regular storage domain in a datacenter
Thanks for pointing out the requirement for Master domain. In theory, will I be able to satisfy the requirement with another iSCSI or maybe Ceph iSCSI as master domain? So each node has - oVirt Node NG / Centos - Ceph cluster member - iSCSI or Ceph iSCSI master domain How practical is such a setup? Thanks, Shantur On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:39 AM Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@k0ste.ru> wrote:
Yep, BZ is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539837 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904669 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905113
Thanks, k
On 19 Jan 2021, at 11:05, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com> wrote:
perhaps a copy paste error about the bugzilla entries? They are the same number...