We will try and address this in the next release of oVirt - there were
some issues earlier with identifying the bricks correctly, but with the
gluster host uuid support in gluster xml commands, we can fix this.
Hi,
I think is a really good question, why does not possible sepereate storage network
traffic like display, etc?
This is not an easy task to set up, and it's more difficult on a live system.
Tibor
----- Eredeti üzenet -----
> On 18/11/14 06:25, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In my experience, having ovirt traffic on the same nic that gluster
>> can make your platafrom unstable. I was using it for large file
>> storage and gluster has so big traffic that ovirt got confused and
>> started marking hosts as unavailable because of hi latency.
>> I've opened an RFE over a year ago, but had no luck with the team to
>> get it done. In the RFE I was asking to have a way in the UI to decide
>> which nic to use for gluster other than the MGMT net that is the one
>> ovirt lets you use.
>> There's another way to do this and it's from outside ovirt. There you
>> have to unregister and re register the bricks using gluster console
>> commands. This way, when you register the bricks, you can specify the
>> IP address of the spare NIC and then the traffic will not interfere
>> with the mgmt.
>> There's a step that I don't recall much, but ovirt is going to need to
>> know that the bricks are no longer is the mgmt IP, maybe someone else
>> in the list can help with this. I can tell you that if you search the
>> list you'll see my posts about this and the replys of those who helped
>> my back then.
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users(a)ovirt.org
>>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
> I think that the possibility to add a separate storage network is a
> must. It doesn't make sense Gluster support if you can't separate
> management network traffic of storage network traffic. In 3.5 you can
> define management/vm/display/migration interfaces but not storage
> interfaces. Why? I don't know. But I think that Gluster support is
> incomplete without exclusive storage networking.
>
> Regards
>
> Federico
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
>
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users