My colleague figured out that in order for ipmilan to work, I had to include lanplus=on in the options. Apparently, lanplus=on is the default for the ilo4 agent, and lanplus=off is the default for the ipmilan agent. ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks@redhat.com> To: "users" <users@ovirt.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 3:02:13 PM Subject: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents
Hi all --
I'm trying to get fencing squared away in my cluster of hp dl-380 servers, which come with ilo4. I was able to get a successful status check from the command line with fence_ilo4, but not w/ the ilo4 option in ovirt.
I see, though, that ilo4 in ovirt just maps to fence_ipmilan, and I was not able to get a successful status check w/ fence_ipmilan from the cli.
So, I tried resetting the mapping so that ilo4 maps to ilo4. Now I can complete the power management test in ovirt, but I imagine there's some reason why ovirt isn't configured this way by default.
Will fencing actually work for me with ilo4 mapped to ilo4, rather than to ipmilan?
Thanks, Jason
---
Jason Brooks Red Hat Open Source and Standards
@jasonbrooks | @redhatopen http://community.redhat.com
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users