Re: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents
My colleague figured out that in order for ipmilan to work, I had to
include lanplus=on in the options. Apparently, lanplus=on is the
default for the ilo4 agent, and lanplus=off is the default for the
ipmilan agent.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks(a)redhat.com>
To: "users" <users(a)ovirt.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2014 3:02:13 PM
Subject: [ovirt-users] ilo4 vs. ipmilan fencing agents
Hi all --
I'm trying to get fencing squared away in my cluster of hp dl-380 servers,
which come with ilo4. I was able to get a successful status check from
the command line with fence_ilo4, but not w/ the ilo4 option in ovirt.
I see, though, that ilo4 in ovirt just maps to fence_ipmilan, and I was
not able to get a successful status check w/ fence_ipmilan from the cli.
So, I tried resetting the mapping so that ilo4 maps to ilo4. Now I can
complete the power management test in ovirt, but I imagine there's some
reason why ovirt isn't configured this way by default.
Will fencing actually work for me with ilo4 mapped to ilo4, rather than
to ipmilan?
Thanks, Jason
---
Jason Brooks
Red Hat Open Source and Standards
@jasonbrooks | @redhatopen
http://community.redhat.com
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users