Re: [Users] affects of changing compatibility setting on running cluster

On 03/12/2014 04:25 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:15:21AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote: >> On 03/12/2014 10:11 AM, Sven Kieske wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 11.03.2014 17:38, schrieb Itamar Heim: >>>> >>>> i understood this to "you can't use 4.14 with 3.4.0". >>> >>> Well I examined BZ 1067096 again, this is what did not work: >>> >>> Steps to Reproduce: >>> 1. Run Engine 3.3 Compatibility level 3.2 or 3.3 >>> 2. Add node (vdsm 4.14) >>> >>> Actual results: >>> Host is installed with VDSM version (4.14) and cannot join cluster >>> which >>> is compatible with VDSM versions [4.13, 4.9, 4.11, 4.12, 4.10]. >>> >>> Pay attention to the engine version, it states 3.3. not 3.4.0 >>> >>> So my conclusion is, you can't install vdsm 4.14. when you want >>> to use engine 3.3. >>> >>> Am I reading something wrong? >>> >>> Here's the link again: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067096#c0 >>> >> >> this can be fixed via engine config, but is not supposed to be >> needed, as vdsm is supposed to have >> vdsm/dsaversion.py.in: 'supportedENGINEs': ['3.0', '3.1', '3.2', >> '3.3', '3.4'], >> >> danken/eli - thoughts? > > I do not really understand why we have this recurrent Engine bug, of > ignoring supportedENGINEs; I think Yaniv does. > i recall asking for detailed explanation for why do we have 3 different restrictions , one for supportedEngines, one for the allowed vdsm versions, and one for the cluster level? if vdsm version is supported why isn't it in engine's capabilities yet?

the issue was verified in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016461 , please reopen if it still appears