On 26/11/14 09:31, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
If no objections will be raised, the proposed changes [2] will be accepted.
I fear I got an objection: quote:
* Alpha release should come after feature freeze Nothing more to say about it
I really think you are twisting the way what is commonly known as an "alpha": from wikipedia: "[..]The alpha phase usually **ends** with a feature freeze[..]" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_software#Alpha emphasis added by me. you are doing it the wrong way: first release an alpha, than make a feature freeze. _After_ feature freeze you can release a beta. I really like this terminology and think it is commonly known and accepted and it works very well. thoughts? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systemadministrator Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 6 32339 Espelkamp T: +49-5772-293-100 F: +49-5772-293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen