Hi, Dan Yasny schreef op 6-2-2014 16:38:
This is the same question as in RHEL or Fedora IMO: do you want the bleeding edge features and lower code stability and reliability, or do you want to have techsupport (and that means a real SLA and an escalation path up to the engineering, if need be) behind you, stable and reliable, well tested code, but less of the advanced features.
Thank you, this is what I thought. It's still a hard decision. If the stability and "testedness" of RHEL is anything to go by, it's not reassuring at all (although it may be better than Fedora, I don't know), although I must say that RedHat support is helpful at times. Thanks again, I think I know enough :-) Best regards, Martijn Grendelman
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Martijn Grendelman <martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl <mailto:martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl>> wrote:
Hi,
This may be the wrong place to ask, but I'm looking for input to form an opinion on an "oVirt or RHEV" question within my company.
I have been running oVirt for about 5 months now, and I'm quite comfortable with its features and maintenance procedures. We are now planning to build a private virtualization cluster for hosting clients' applications as well as our own. Some people in the company are questioning whether we should buy RHEV, but at this point, I can't see the benefits.
Can anyone on this list shed a light on when RHEV might be a better choice than oVirt? What are the benefits? The trade-offs?
I am looking for pragmatic, real-world things, not marketing mumbo jumbo. That, I can get from redhat.com <http://redhat.com> ;-)
Best regards, Martijn. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users